The United Stand engagement report
@UnitedStandMUFC - 2.9M followers on X
Measured over 688 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 452 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 688 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 0.705% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 25.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 688 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 75x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #goldbridge, #carrick.
Measured over 688 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #mufc, #goldbridge, #carrick.
Compared with accounts its own size
The United Stand's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.015%, The United Stand sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 89% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 13, 202675x their median
Someone who cares. https://t.co/FZeoxWNGui
- Sep 25, 202663x their median
https://t.co/OH4DK68cwk
- Sep 27, 202633x their median
π The best there is, the best there was, the best there ever will be. https://t.co/Olc80J15t9
- Oct 13, 202631x their median
Sir Lisandro Martinez. π£οΈ https://t.co/PpyKh0CKVt
- Sep 14, 202628x their median
On grass! π¨π² π https://t.co/kiMbnvdDWF
- Sep 20, 202628x their median
Cunha: "It's only one point, but with this shirt you never play for one point." #mufc
- Sep 26, 202627x their median
π¨ Welcome to Man United, David Eze!! https://t.co/5O5XwCsMm0
- Aug 30, 202625x their median
π£οΈ Michael Carrick on Marcus Rashford: βI'm really delighted for Marcus [Rashford]. I'm sure he's HAPPY to be here. βTo be starting games and to be PART of a good performance. He did well.β https://t.co/FD7qaJ03U4
- Sep 19, 202623x their median
π¨ Matthijs de Ligt and Luke Shaw have been included in tomorrow's squad. [@StevenRailston] #mufc https://t.co/VAm4QUfOPM
- Oct 2, 202622x their median
πͺ Assist for Youri π§€ Clean sheet for Senne https://t.co/HikHh8uY8b
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 452 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 688 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 0.705% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 25.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 688 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 75x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #goldbridge, #carrick.
- What is The United Stand's engagement rate on X?
- The United Stand (@UnitedStandMUFC) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 688 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,948,036 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.015%, The United Stand sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @UnitedStandMUFC have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @UnitedStandMUFC post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 25.13 posts per day across the measured window.