UNICORN⚡️🦄 engagement report
@UnicornBitcoin - 140K followers on X
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 135 interactions against 140K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 47x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bnb, #gateevent, #美股.
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #bnb, #gateevent, #美股.
Compared with accounts its own size
UNICORN⚡️🦄's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.097%, UNICORN⚡️🦄 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 74% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 457 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Feb 14, 201247x their median
So wrong! @BarackObama is hosting China's VP Xi Jinping today at the Pentagon with a full honor ceremony with music and cannons...
- Aug 31, 202424x their median
这图存一下 https://t.co/z0xSThOYTc
- Sep 17, 20268.0x their median
冥冥之中,仿佛有一种神奇的力量 一头肉牛的价格,和一盎司黄金的价格,三千多年来竟然一直彼此跟随 这基本上就是人类历史上最古老、最稳定的配对交易
- Sep 15, 20263.9x their median
一个人揣着 18 万美元去香港赌马,走的时候变成了 9 亿美元 这是真事儿,这人叫 Bill Benter 1986 年,他在拉斯维加斯算牌,被每一家赌场都轰了出来。算牌这手艺,赌场恨得牙痒。美国混不下去了,他就带着这 18 万美元飞到香港,改赌赛马 他靠一套笨办法,磨了十年 香港赛马,庄家会给每匹马开赔率。赔率代表庄家认为这匹马赢的概率。但庄家也是估的,会估错 Benter 就钻这个空子。他带一台电脑,花了好几年,教电脑只算一件事:每匹马真实的获胜概率 他算出来的数,跟庄家赔率一比,就知道谁准。他算的胜率比赔率暗示的高,说明庄家低估了这匹马,他就下注;反过来庄家高估了,他就跳过 这就叫期望值。赢的期望 = 胜率 × 赔率 − 输的概率。只有这个数是正的,才值得下 十年只下期望值为正的注,不下别的。小钱就这么滚成了 9 亿 他这套东西的地基,是 MIT 那堂 51 分钟的概率课。那堂课的核心,就一个除法: 把所有可能的结果列出来,这叫样本空间。掷骰子就是 1 到 6,六个结果 你只关心其中一部分,比如赌它是偶数,2、4、6 这三个,这叫事件 概率 = 你关心的结果 ÷ 所有结果 Benter 干的事,就是把这个除法从骰子搬到赛马。把每匹马赢的概率数清楚,再跟价格比 市场里每一个价格,背后都是一个概率。谁把真实概率估得更准,谁就长期赢钱 所以别猜涨跌,去算概率。下注之前,先把真实概率数清楚,再拿它跟价格比
- Sep 16, 20262.9x their median
今晚美联储利率 加息25 基点——看涨 加息50 基点——看涨 不加息————看涨 降息—————看涨 就这么简单
- Sep 23, 20262.3x their median
为什么你总是赚小钱,然后一次大亏,把本金和前面那些小利润一起带走 这事塔勒布二十年前就写透了 他叫非对称杠杆,说的是同一笔钱,涨和跌两个方向上效果不一样 塔勒布,华尔街干了二十多年的期权交易员 《黑天鹅》《反脆弱》《非对称风险》都是他写的,2008 年金融危机靠尾部对冲翻倍以上 2020 年 3 月熔断那波,他顾问的基金单月涨了三千多个百分点 大部分人一辈子在凹性那边打转,还以为是运气不好 先看形状 凹性:你的收益曲线往下弯 赚的时候是一小口一小口,亏的时候没有底 波动越大你越惨,因为你左边的亏损是敞开的 凸性:曲线往上弯 亏的时候封顶,赚的时候不封顶 波动越大你越占便宜 同一场行情,落在两种结构上,结局是两个物种 为什么这种结构迟早会爆 1/ 概率骗了你 赚小钱的时候胜率很高,看着稳 但决定长期结果的是概率乘赔率 胜率 90%、赔率 1 比 10,长期是死的 那 10% 出现一次,就把前面 90 次全抹了 反复下注,尾部早晚会到 2/ 乘法世界里亏损不对称 赚 10% 再亏 10%,你剩 99% 亏 50% 要涨 100% 才回本 亏 100% 就是永久归零,涨十倍也没用 十次小赚堆起来的利润,一次大亏就能清零 3/ 这种玩法逼着你每次都猜对 亏损没有上限,你就必须预知哪一次是例外 塔勒布的原话是,脆弱的东西需要被预测 你一旦开始依赖预测,就已经输了 4/ 最阴的是它在奖励你 小钱一次次到账,曲线平稳向上,人会生出掌控感 于是仓位越加越大,直到某一笔把前面全部吃掉 这套结构专门先养自信,再一次性清算 常见的几个样子 卖期权收权利金 高息理财和资金盘 单票加杠杆,扛单不止损 靠胜率吃饭的短线,赚一点就跑,亏了就扛 塔勒布怎么解 1/ 把结构反过来,先问最坏情况 这笔钱归零,你还照常生活吗 能,才继续谈赔率 2/ 只买下跌有底、上涨不封顶的东西 下限靠现金流和共识撑着,上限是所有人的情绪 情绪没有上限 3/ 单笔损失先封死,再谈收益 亏损上限由你定,别交给行情和爆仓价 4/ 用杠铃,不要用折中 一头极度安全,一头极度激进 中间那块最脆,看着稳的资产加一点杠杆,出一次事就全没了 5/ 把赚小钱的渠道挪去当保费 现金流、内容、返佣、小社区,这些收入稳定 它的用途不是让你发大财,是让你在最坏的时候还有子弹 6/ 留一部分现金 现金不赚钱,但它让你能在别人被迫卖出的时候出手 我自己就是从这个结构里爬出来的 在一开始做交易的时候 大保证金大仓位来赚一个小利润后就盈利出场,这就是持续的小利润,一波大亏损失惨重的结构 慢慢改变到变成了一个小仓位,小保证金,然后把持仓的时间周期和对应的持仓止盈都大幅提高,形成了以小本金博大利润的结构 把赚小钱亏大钱的结构反过来 以小博大
- Sep 23, 20262.1x their median
“ 币安会客厅 ” 这一期,很荣幸请到"财经女侠"叶檀老师 我们聊了很多大家最近很关心的话题:婚前财产要不要公证?赞成AA 制吗?三金该不该买,感情里能不能谈钱…也聊到叶老师从 2014 年创业到今天,一路走来的心路历程和心态变化 这些内容,完整版出来之后欢迎观看💛 这篇我想先单独整理一个话题,因为它几乎是每个人都在问的:现在到底处在什么周期?该投什么? 听完叶檀老师的分享,我把她的核心观点整理了出来 一、一个时代在结束,另一个早已开始 如果说现在是康波周期的转折点,那结束的是什么? 叶檀老师的判断是:互联网时代,正在走向尾声。接棒的是 AI。而且它不是刚刚开始,是早就开始了。 她给了一个信号:在中国整体投资下行的背景下,规划中的 AI 相关基础设施投资是几十万亿级别,年均复合增速在 10% 以上。一枝独秀。 只要到 2030 年的规划不变,社会的财富和资源就会持续向这个方向倾斜。 但她特别强调了一句:这不代表现在投 AI 就一定赚钱。AI 里面也分细分板块,也有波动。 二、中国的周期,被压缩了 从 1978 年到今天,中国用 40 多年走完了制造业、基础行业、信息化。 别人上百年的周期,在中国被大幅压缩。 结果就是:切换极快,也极急剧。 她讲了一个朋友的故事。90 年代在大开发商做区域老总,跟投买了 100 多套房。 放在 2021 年最后一波疯狂之前,这是神话。 但如果一直拿到今天呢?尤其在三四线城市,连出租都难。没有现金流,还要持续投入成本。 资产,立刻变成了负债。 三、财富在换手,人性跟着周期变 同一时期,另一群人的感受完全相反。 一位年轻的高科技企业家,公司刚上市,钱多到不知道怎么花,买房子推倒重建当消遣。 房地产商觉得寒冬,科技企业家觉得遇上了前所未有的好时代。 叶檀老师的总结是:我们看到的是人性的变化,但本质上,是经济周期带来的财富变化,改变了人。 四、中周期:地缘政治正在给行业定价 长周期之外,还有中周期。国际形势的变化,会让某些行业突然特别好。 她举的例子是船舶。 这一轮船舶周期持续得比以往都长。原因很具体:红海航道受阻,船要绕道南非,有的船甚至被扣住动不了。 以前一家航运公司 3 艘船就能周转,现在要 6 艘。 周转周期变长,需要的船更多。从全社会看,这是一种浪费型的、无效的投资。但对船舶行业来说,就是持续的景气。 再看船运保险价格,今天上天,明天落地,根本没法定价。 谁说了算?在社交媒体上发帖的人说了算。这就是现在市场不一样的地方。 五、长周期还在,有一条线从没变过 那是不是长周期不存在了? 叶檀老师说不是。从 80 年代到现在,有一条主线始终没变:高端制造和高科技的发展。 只要是能赚钱的高科技企业,就能发展得很好。 六、萧条末期,一个极端分化的世界 她也没有回避现实。从制造业投资和就业数据看,现在的经济很差。即便是最好的大学,有些专业的毕业生就业已经很难。 她的判断是:传统制造业和部分消费行业,正处在萧条期的末期,在见底。 但伴随着新力量的出现,会有人很好过,有人很难过。 我们面对的,是一个极端的世界。近在咫尺,冷暖不同。 我的一点理解是, 周期不会告诉你该买什么。但它能告诉你,钱在往哪里流、风险在哪里积累。 房子可以从资产变成负债,一个行业可以因为几发炮弹重新景气。所有"确定"的东西,都有保质期。 叶檀老师在分享中多次强调,每个人擅长的投资工具不同、承担风险的能力也不一样,小额试错、量力而行🤜🏻🔸🤛🏼
- Sep 27, 20261.6x their median
推特上版权这么无所谓么 诺兰神作《2026奥德赛》完整电影 https://t.co/ksJgXOy8nk
- Sep 21, 2026
大饼 84000 了 这上涨节奏真好 说到节奏 这空灵鼓不错 找麦通 @MSX_CN 给大家送三个图里这个空灵鼓中秋礼盒 简单 1️⃣ 关注 @MSX_CN @Jing_MSX 2️⃣ 赞+评论你的麦通 UID 转发不转发无所谓 还没UID的,可以注册 https://t.co/62nQG6Pgqd https://t.co/zJ8jyWSoEk
- Sep 24, 2026
在习近平主席访美欢迎仪式上 B-1轰炸机和F-22猛禽战斗机飞越现场 特朗普被吓了一个激灵 哈哈哈哈哈😅 https://t.co/MTkcqFRJGH
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 135 interactions against 140K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 47x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bnb, #gateevent, #美股.
- What is UNICORN⚡️🦄's engagement rate on X?
- UNICORN⚡️🦄 (@UnicornBitcoin) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 139,628 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.097%, UNICORN⚡️🦄 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @UnicornBitcoin have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @UnicornBitcoin post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.