Nupur J Sharma engagement report
@UnSubtleDesi - 779K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 779K followers, an engagement rate of 0.526%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 5.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #eci, #electioncommission, #okbye.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #eci, #electioncommission, #okbye.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nupur J Sharma's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.526%, Nupur J Sharma sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 56% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 25% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 246 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 15, 20215.4x their median
Everyday, I feel like we are documenting our own end.
- Sep 26, 20263.3x their median
In Kanpur, Dalit Hindus are being forcefully converted to Islam. Sonu Jatav says a mazar was erected inside his premises. They didn’t even spare his 10 yo daughter Where is @BhimArmyChief hiding? Explosive ground report by @Cawnpore_Journo https://t.co/AEr3oQk9K0
- Aug 27, 20263.1x their median
The best thing about time is.. it changes https://t.co/DBkhU1xwMR
- Sep 10, 20262.3x their median
11 students have approached ICC, complaining that a JNU professor offered extra marks for sexual favours AISA is silent. @abhijeet_dipke and @SauravDassss are silent Questions are being raised about a Congress connection @RitikaChandola’s ground report https://t.co/3tTgJPtDDW
- Sep 10, 20262.2x their median
Professor Bimol Akoijam is the one accused in the JNU sexual harassment case, according to ABVP. He is also a Congress MP. @RahulGandhi, for your perusal, since you talk about smashing patriarchy.
- Sep 2, 20262.1x their median
Behind every crazy woman, there’s a man who made her that way, it is said. I wonder who we should blame for this spine-tingling mess - Modi, Suvendu Adhikari, Prashant Kishor, Jai Dehadrai or Henry https://t.co/SLb0Hm9Zsv
- Aug 14, 20261.6x their median
Explosive! Newslaundry lied about acting on 4 sexual harassment complaints since 2017 Read shocking details https://t.co/yeCWPqTf7a
- Sep 24, 20261.6x their median
CJP’s grand plan is to ask political parties to boycott elections and refuse to participate in the democratic process, because he believes democracy is dead, and the way to revive that dead democracy is to ensure the mythical dictator wins unopposed.
- Sep 2, 2026
India International Centre, which invited Swara Bhasker during its recent event that triggered outrage over her remarks on Padmaavat's Jauhar scene, was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. @immortalsoulin breaks down IIC’s shady history https://t.co/Az8z4m0Ctf
- Aug 21, 2026
I have been pursuing this Political and Business Bucanneer for the past 15 years over a case of open and shut fraud As telecom minister Maran, the bucanneer, installing a 1000 line secret Telephone exchange case in his home in the name of the Regional Manager of BSNL unknown to the system was a famous expose by me in the New Indian Express in 2010 He was using it for uplinking Sun TV progs and benefitting hundreds of crores. The secret phones were also national security breach as they could make any call to anyone without being monitored. At that time the DMK was in love relation with the biggest national security risk the LTTE But the buccaneer with his money political power and media power delayed a case which could he completed in months by a decade This is the 7th time the buccaneer telecom minister went to the supreme court to quash and/or delay the CBI probe into the fraud exposed in 2010 The case was investigated in 2007 by an honest inspector of CBI who used to go by scooter from Beasant Nagar to Shastry Bhavan in Chennai. He risked his life and asked for permission to file FIR. But the UPA govt of which the DMK was a constituent prevented the CBI from registering FIR I had to file a writ in Supreme court in 2014 to direct the CBI to file FIR The buccaneer went to the High coourt and then to Supreme Court and almost got the case quashed with the then Attorney General almost colluding with them The AG who had given opinion to govt that the secret phones were in breach of national security conceded in the court contrary to it I had to write a scathing article to expose the Attorney During the hearing then CJI even said it is after all 1.72 cr cable laying expenses and that can be paid by Marans and the case closed. Then I wrote an article saying that it is not a case of cable laying expenses but secret telephone exchange of over 1000 lines installed at the ministers home and used for uplinking Sun TV progs (for which a secret cable laid at a cost of 1..72 cr) the benefit in which would be hundreds of crores I also reminder the Supreme court that just months before the court had confirmed sentence on a clerk for accepting a bribe of Rs 265 declaring that corruption should not be tolerated I wrote that if a clerk has to go jail for a bibe of rs 265 the higher the stature of the corrupt greater should be the punishment That attempt to quash the case failed and the charges were framed. Then a pliable trial court first discharged them. I scathingly attacked the trial court order as perverse The Madras High court set aside the perverse order and the buccaneer minister went to the supreme court. The supreme court asked them to face the trial They delayed the trial by several years and now the trial is over and all witnesses had been examined. Then the buccaneer began another round of litigation to delay the trial by getting Madras HC to order that the present telecom secy be summoned as court witness .. an absolutely untenable order The CBI came in appeal to the SC against that order and shockingly the AG who appeared for the CBI earlier appeared for the buccaneer! Then in a detailed article the OpIndia recounted the whole case from the start and the role of the then AG and now Maran counsel https://t.co/ygmfwthZIj After the OpIndia article the then AG didn't appear in the case The SC finally told Maran that the telecom secy may be called not as court witness but as defence witness. What is the difference If he is a defence witness his statements will be admissible against the accused Not if he is a court witness They will now.probably not call the telecom secy as defence witness Hopefully the trial will conclude soon and justice will be done ....20 years after the fraud was discovered by CBI but blocked by UPA ....16 years after it was exposed by me in the New Indian Express ...12 years after the legal battle began https://t.co/V84GRbYt7q
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 779K followers, an engagement rate of 0.526%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 5.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #eci, #electioncommission, #okbye.
- What is Nupur J Sharma's engagement rate on X?
- Nupur J Sharma (@UnSubtleDesi) has an engagement rate of 0.526%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 779,464 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.526%, Nupur J Sharma sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @UnSubtleDesi have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @UnSubtleDesi post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.