Back to @UltraDane's profile

Dane engagement report

@UltraDane - 321K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 321K followers
Per impression
1.10%
7.9K views on a typical post
Reach
2.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
87
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 87 interactions against 321K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 153x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026. Recurring tag: #owlm.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dane's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Dane sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,829 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,829 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,240 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026153x their median

    It is horrifying you want to know why? You're looking at around $1M worth of guts they want so bad they prefer to kill for them. https://t.co/MmfpodLD6m

    10K2.7K432183486K viewsView on X
  • Apr 25, 202552x their median

    Waking up each day to more and more attacks, especially against White women and children, it's horrifying. Always the same people, always the same excuses. Europe's worth saving, your children and ancestors matter. #OWLM https://t.co/xcf1waAefX

    3.4K774345361.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202614x their median

    More proof cats are insanely quick and fear absolutely nothing! https://t.co/NseE4eiUZe

    1.1K5534431K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20265.9x their median

    While these 2 are fighting, their money, phones, and anything of value is being stolen. https://t.co/gVPKTzWC7d

    4055551416K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.2x their median

    “Issa prank bro” “Chucky the prankster” who followed multiple women around asking “are you ready to die” faces 20 years in prison, but as you can easily tell, the future does not exist in his mind. He literally can't understand his behavior right now has a direct impact on his life, which quickly converts to a harsh reality. Courtroom etiquette... that's for chumps, it does not exist in his world. He doesn't understand why he's getting the maximum punishment now, when before it looked like 5 years probation.

    3894124012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.9x their median

    Satan Central (NYC) has manifested itself into a cesspit of thieving murderous non-White people. It's true and it's getting 'progressively' worse. https://t.co/P641SIg8pO

    3475919411K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.6x their median

    🇪🇸 Want to know why the trains are ALWAYS running late in Barcelona? You're looking at it. https://t.co/Gd6KWjEmLV

    3473616210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.4x their median

    Spain's not going down quietly and you can thank Isabel Peralta and Núcleo Nacional for much of it. Thousands gather in Plaza del Pilar in Zaragoza. The message is clear: People have HAD ENOUGH. SÁNCHEZ, YOUR TIME IS UP. https://t.co/QIsYRbwq8A

    33048527.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.4x their median

    The "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict needs to be banned altogether. If you did it, you're guilty, the reasons why you did it can be explored more in the mental ward of any prison. https://t.co/bmdcRwqlpt

    264171018.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.3x their median

    He disrespected the wrong man. When the bully eventually wakes back up, he's getting arrested 😆 ! https://t.co/Pq6gmMU9t3

    27696014K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#owlm

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 87 interactions against 321K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 153x its own typical post.

What is Dane's engagement rate on X?
Dane (@UltraDane) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 321,078 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Dane sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,829 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @UltraDane have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @UltraDane post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going