Uber Chelsea FC engagement report
@UberChelseaFC_ - 266K followers on X
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 585 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.22%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Uber Chelsea FC's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.22%, Uber Chelsea FC sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,890 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.605%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.605% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 28% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 21, 202669x their median
🚨 Aston Villa discussing deal to sign Alejandro Garnacho from Chelsea. Talks for 22yo winger loan + conditional buy obligation. Unai Emery driving #AVFC move - wanted Argentine before #CFC & now. Unrelated to Rogers transfer. W/ @J_Tanswell @TheAthleticFC https://t.co/op2dUxGdC4
- Aug 22, 202648x their median
"I think that sums it up" Fair to say this Spurs fan wasn't pleased with their performance 😅 https://t.co/ZAdVaVbjlS
- Jul 21, 202621x their median
Morgan Rogers signing, Alejandro Garnacho leaving and Anthony Taylor retiring all in one day. https://t.co/dR2Aba8059
- Jul 23, 202613x their median
Lacroix all but done but now it’s time to get John Stones in. It’s the missing piece since Thiago Silva. Get it done Chels. https://t.co/64ZPSipU7W
- Aug 8, 202612x their median
🚨🚨| JUST IN: Mason Mount has gone off INJURED after just 20 minutes. 🤕🏴 https://t.co/Z2MCgf4Eqm
- Sep 6, 202610x their median
Sorry, I can’t get over the fact that Gabriel has purposefully kicked someone in the head - shat himself because he knew EXACTLY what he was doing and not been sent off? If that’s 20 mins in, it’s looked at properly. If that’s any other PL games it’s a red.
- Feb 12, 20249.4x their median
Every little thing is gonna be alright 🎵 https://t.co/oL5VIEbPsX
- Aug 3, 20269.3x their median
Transferring your ticket to your mate for FV gets you the same punishment as sexual misconduct, seen it all now😂😂 https://t.co/J3eTdhH5WR
- Sep 1, 20267.3x their median
This is karma for what we did to Ziyech isn’t it. What the actual fuck.
- Jul 30, 20266.9x their median
71 days it is today. https://t.co/ajLWSUkCVY
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 585 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.22%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.
- What is Uber Chelsea FC's engagement rate on X?
- Uber Chelsea FC (@UberChelseaFC_) has an engagement rate of 0.22%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 265,676 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.22%, Uber Chelsea FC sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,890 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @UberChelseaFC_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @UberChelseaFC_ post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.