Back to @UTDFootyTalks's profile

ZAK ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช engagement report

@UTDFootyTalks - 173K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 173K followers
Per impression
0.043%
2.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 173K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.043% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 2308x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #mufc.

Compared with accounts its own size

ZAK ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, ZAK ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 76 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 20262308x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ NEW: Sources say Jason Wilcox, whose task it would be to make a call on Michael Carrickโ€™s Manchester United future, is described as being an advocate for STABILITY. #MUFC [@lauriewhitwell] https://t.co/nJYhXKq0jb

    2.1K7111034127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261214x their median

    ๐ŸšจIneos and Jim Ratcliffe have ownership in Manchester United, OGC Nice and Lausanne-Sport Nice and Lausanne are LAST in their respective leagues, United are currently 13th in the Premier League https://t.co/SNLYSgBiPD

    1.1K76171129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026274x their median

    A glimpse of the newest Orange and Blue. ๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/FIcLGAsVie

    242215617K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026230x their median

    One player each big club should sign next: City: WZE ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Barca: Porro ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Madrid: Maza ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฟ PSG: Vitor Reis ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Bayern: Trafford ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ Liverpool: Ryerson ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Chelsea: Camara ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ณ Arsenal: Abde ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

    203519332K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20264.0x their median

    SACK HIM NOW.

    30102.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20264.0x their median

    If Jason Wilcox isnโ€™t being sacked anytime soon we can call off another 2 years of challenging for the title.

    40001.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20263.0x their median

    We never really even went for the win, why donโ€™t you put Rashford and Cunha both on at the same time? You desperately need a win and your only subs are Mount for Baleba and Cunha for Tielemans?

    20101.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20263.0x their median

    Why is just Mason Mount coming on? We literally have Cunha Lacey Rashford on the bench

    10203.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20263.0x their median

    Not confident at all about tomorrow and Iโ€™m quite sure if Manchester United fail to take 3 points thatโ€™s Micheal Carrick out of the doorโ€ฆ #MUFC

    30002.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20263.0x their median

    Things I would do if I could to get Luis Enrique to Manchester United man.

    10203.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mufc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 173K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.043% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 2308x its own typical post.

What is ZAK ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช's engagement rate on X?
ZAK ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช (@UTDFootyTalks) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 173,253 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, ZAK ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @UTDFootyTalks have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @UTDFootyTalks post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going