Back to @USCIS's profile

USCIS engagement report

@USCIS - 575K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 575K followers
Per impression
0.645%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
7.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
270
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 270 interactions against 575K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.645% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

USCIS's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, USCIS sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,716 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,716 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,382 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link76% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 289 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 202614x their median

    Exclusive: The Trump administration is allowing immigration officers to consider whether some applicants have used taxpayer-funded benefits — including Medicaid, food stamps and housing assistance — when determining whether they qualify for permanent legal status. https://t.co/GJ9On9x5XB

    2.9K2635931063.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20266.2x their median

    During a Green Card interview with our officers, a Jamaican alien confessed to committing marriage fraud, revealing a connection to an even larger marriage fraud scheme. We promptly called on @ICEgov, and officers arrived at our El Paso office to take this criminal into custody. https://t.co/ARQ3A7w47N

    1.2K3418910114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20265.0x their median

    If you have information about aliens or naturalized citizens involved in violence, terrorism-related activity, material support to terrorist organizations, or efforts to threaten national security or public safety, report it! Report here: https://t.co/VFGQNnLkZC https://t.co/DoWuKVLN0n

    83936912119116K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20264.2x their median

    This final rule is intended to help ensure that those seeking permanent residence are able to support themselves and are not likely to become primarily dependent on public assistance. USCIS is committed to applying the law as enacted by Congress, providing clear guidance, and ensuring consistent, fair adjudications. https://t.co/c0chw36Vfx

    963115624290K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.3x their median

    Submit a tip to USCIS if you suspect an alien of immigration fraud, false claims of U.S. citizenship, criminal activity, or threats connected to national security or public safety. https://t.co/M0GrPIvbfe https://t.co/9eV1SBMjnD

    565240651837K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.2x their median

    If you suspect immigration fraud, criminal activity, or actions by aliens that threaten national security or public safety, report it! Your tip can help protect America. Report concerns here: https://t.co/VFGQNnLkZC

    5591931011678K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20262.8x their median

    IN CUSTODY: Two brothers from India—one with multiple felony firearms charges and reckless driving offenses and the other with prior firearm offenses and a previous arrest for involvement in a major vehicle theft operation. They came to our offices for a Refugee/Asylee Family Petition interview. Thanks to our San Jose team’s thorough vetting, both brothers have been taken into custody by @ICEgov.

    584120491466K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.8x their median

    Under @POTUS and @USCISJoe, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has declared war on immigration fraud. Report suspected immigration fraud now: https://t.co/CgbhUTxXZP https://t.co/EdJ935J2UE

    541150581781K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.7x their median

    "For far too long, the asylum system has been exploited for purposes of delay and work authorization, not legitimate claims of protection. America's asylum system exists to protect individuals who genuinely fear persecution and this rule will help ensure that resources are directed to the timely adjudication of those claims instead of to those seeking to use the system as a loophole." - @USCISJoe https://t.co/9IMr78UAVO

    5331236115136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.7x their median

    Temporary Protected Status is exactly that: Temporary TPS was created for extraordinary short-term circumstances—not a decades long loophole for permanent residency. https://t.co/b7cCa9isBw

    54911460661K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 270 interactions against 575K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.645% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is USCIS's engagement rate on X?
USCIS (@USCIS) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 575,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, USCIS sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,716 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @USCIS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @USCIS post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going