PlayerSells
Back to @UN_NERV's profile

特務機関NERV engagement report

@UN_NERV - 3.2M followers on X

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 3.2M followers
Per impression
0.113%
316K views on a typical post
Reach
9.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
356
interactions (median)
Saved
0.002%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.77/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 356 interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 316K times each, and 0.113% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

特務機関NERV's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, 特務機関NERV sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.046%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%8.9K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 87 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202529x their median

    【水害にあったときに】 「震災がつなぐ全国ネットワーク」が水害にあったときに必要な情報をまとめています。このツイートの画像は、「水害にあったときに」のPDFを引用したものです。(2025年7月版) リンク先から詳しい冊子版を参照できます。→ https://t.co/CVV8RRtcZB https://t.co/x2VULEBHsY

    7.0K3.2K0474.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202626x their median

    【NHKニュース速報 07:32】 午前6時58分ごろインドネシア付近で地震 太平洋で津波発生の可能性 この地震による日本への津波の心配なし 震源はインドネシア付近 M7.7

    6.7K2.4K01521.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202621x their median

    【NHKニュース速報 12:34】 俳優の岸惠子さん死去 93歳 映画「君の名は」「おとうと」など出演

    6.4K9800513.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202613x their median

    【台風第17号実況・予報 2026年08月14日 21:40】 台風第17号(ナンカー)は熱帯低気圧に変わりました。 https://t.co/ylRYYeQLzY

    3.3K1.1K0299579K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202611x their median

    【NHKニュース速報 08:04】 自民鈴木幹事長 有村総務会長 西村選対委員長 靖国神社にそろって参拝 「終戦の日」に

    3.4K410037424K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20269.2x their median

    【地震 06:37】 [震度4]福岡地方 [震度3]佐賀北部

    2.2K88711921.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20267.3x their median

    【緊急地震速報 第1報 2026年8月17日】 6時37分頃、福岡県福岡地方を震源とする地震がありました。今後の情報に注意してください。

    1.6K7621208922K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.8x their median

    【台風第18号実況・予報 2026年08月19日 13:00】 台風第18号(ソウデル)が発生しました。 https://t.co/EAX207ywpJ

    9435930167399K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.7x their median

    【地震情報(海外) 2026年08月15日】 日本時間の15日6時58分頃、インドネシア付近(インドネシア、フローレス)でM7.7の地震がありました。太平洋で津波発生の可能性があります。 この地震による日本への津波の影響はありません。 https://t.co/fZaEgjQAZM

    1.0K549075349K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.0x their median

    【緊急地震速報 第3報 2026年8月15日】 20時30分頃、台湾付近を震源とする地震がありました。地震の規模はM5.1程度、最大震度2程度と推定されています。この情報は気象庁の予報に基づく推定です。情報は誤差を含む場合があります。

    1.2K248115507K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 356 interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 316K times each, and 0.113% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

What is 特務機関NERV's engagement rate on X?
特務機関NERV (@UN_NERV) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 73 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,241,140 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, 特務機関NERV sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @UN_NERV have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @UN_NERV post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going