Back to @UMEgob's profile

UME engagement report

@UMEgob - 236K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.041%
of 236K followers
Per impression
1.17%
8.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
97
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 797 interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #umedula, #ume, #barcelona.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #umedula, #ume, #barcelona.

Compared with accounts its own size

UME's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.041%, UME sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 287 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20268.2x their median

    #IFSegorbe 🚒Durante la noche, las unidades de la #UME han continuado con misiones para proteger #Gátova y evitar que el frente de llama cruzara la carretera CV-25. 🚜Máquinaria de ingenieros tambien han realizado ataque directo y apertura de líneas de defensa. https://t.co/KJPApjc7QJ

    60317016826K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.6x their median

    En Cerezal, las unidades del #BIEM1 se preparan para la defensa de la localidad frente al #IFPinofranqueado Todo el planeamiento, cada acción, cada decisión sobre el terreno, tiene un mismo objetivo: proteger a las personas y sus hogares del avance del fuego🔥 https://t.co/pYSL33xTjG

    49212514717K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.4x their median

    Una imagen vale SIEMPRE más que mil palabras. A través de la fotografía capturamos momentos, reflejamos el compromiso y ponemos rostro a quienes, cada día, trabajan al servicio de los demás. #DíaInternacionalDeLaFotografía https://t.co/GYthCZUmFf

    4791231748.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.0x their median

    Trabajo sobre el terreno para asegurar el perímetro. Unidades del Tercer Batallón de la #UME realizan labores de perimetración en el #IFSegorbe, empleando herramienta manual y máquina de ingenieros D-5. #BIEM3 https://t.co/MBU5Rj4oDy

    4679713118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.9x their median

    Los militares del Tercer Batallón, desplegados en el #IFValencia, realizan misiones de: 🚒 Liquidación de llama con autobombas en la CV-500, en la pedanía de El Saler 🚁 Ataque directo con helicóptero #BHELEME 🔥 Control y extinción de reencendidos @GVA112 https://t.co/9QPTHsEwE9

    44410910927K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.8x their median

    #IFAldeaDelFresno Las unidades del Primer Batallón realizan misiones de ataque directo y liquidación a lo largo de la carretera M-510 entre las localidades de Aldea del Fresno y Méntrida @112cmadrid https://t.co/YDLuN2AkcJ

    4509712116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.7x their median

    Finalizadas las misiones asignadas en el #IFValencia, las unidades del Tercer Batallón #BIEM3 han iniciado el repliegue escalonado hacia su base de Bétera, en Valencia 🚒 #ParaServir 🇪🇸 https://t.co/Oxxmatu9g3

    3588613214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.3x their median

    Actualización de personal y medios en 🔥#IFPeñasdeRiglos en #Huesca. Más de 570 militares de la UME y 170 medios se encuentran realizando misiones para hacer frente a la extinción del incendio. https://t.co/0nruqtEiGv

    338746115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.3x their median

    #IFSegorbe Durante la noche realizaremos misiones de vigilancia del perímetro y vuelos de drones ante posibles reproducciones que puedan producirse. #BuenasNoches https://t.co/M9r9qJGYn4

    270475211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.3x their median

    #IFPinofranqueado Trabajo en equipo 💪 Unidades del Primer Batallón #BIEM1 junto con @BRIF_PINO y @PLANINFOEX trabajan de forma conjunta aplicando fuego técnico y realizando tendidos de manguera para evitar el avance del incendio forestal en la zona próxima a Cerezal. https://t.co/Knap4dN86s

    253633211K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#umedula#ume#barcelona#díamundialdeldonantedemédulaósea#emes

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 797 interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #umedula, #ume, #barcelona.

What is UME's engagement rate on X?
UME (@UMEgob) has an engagement rate of 0.041%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 235,969 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.041%, UME sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @UMEgob have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @UMEgob post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going