Back to @UKIP's profile

UKIP engagement report

@UKIP - 216K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 216K followers
Per impression
1.77%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
67
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 216K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

UKIP's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, UKIP sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 372 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202669x their median

    Halal slaughter - the slicing of an animal's throat and the draining of its blood whilst a Muslim prayer is said - is a barbaric practice and must be banned. A sheep can take up to 4 minutes to completely bleed out. For a goat, up to 5 minutes. For cattle, up to 15 minutes. Slaughtering animals in this way causes unnecessary suffering, immense distress and pain. Halal slaughter is animal abuse. This foreign practice has invaded our meat supply. We are all eating it without our knowledge, nor our consent. People should not be forced to eat halal or be deceived into it. In 2015, it was estimated was 114 million animals were subjected to Halal slaughter in England and Wales. In 2024, this roughly doubled to 214.6 million. In 2024, 82% of sheep in England and Wales were slaughtered with Halal methods. This works out approximately 4 in every 5 sheep were slaughtered to Islamic practice. In the same year, 48% of goats and 22% chickens were killed in the same way. We are a Christian country and a nation of animal lovers who take animal welfare seriously. It is our culture to ensure animals are treated with care, compassion and respect. The following countries have already placed restrictions on Halal slaughter: 🟣 Norway 🟣 Sweden 🟣 Switzerland 🟣 Iceland 🟣 Denmark 🟣 Slovenia 🟣 Slovakia 🟣 Belgium 🟣 Estonia 🟣 Latvia 🟣 Lithuania We don’t need or want clearer labelling. Halal slaughter is barbaric and should be banned.

    3.3K1.1K1335248K viewsView on X
  • Jan 31, 202629x their median

    London is a Christian city. Britain is a Christian land. Christians will not be banned from marching. @NickTenconi ✝️ https://t.co/bbHWR6DoTs

    1.6K3238712100K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202621x their median

    Today the Met Police allowed the left to breach conditions and try to block our peaceful protest. We marched through them. We will not let leftist thugs dictate what we can and can’t do. 🇬🇧 @NickTenconi https://t.co/lZWRjsdbaZ

    1.1K27223715K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20268.7x their median

    Ban the construction of new mosques. Deport the Islamists. Ban the call to prayer. Remove all public funding for mosques. Ban public Islamic mass-prayer. End immigration from Islamist countries. Ban halal. Prosecute teachers who force children to engage in Islamic prayer. Ban the Burkha. Demolish any mosques that facilitate extremism.

    491662406.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.5x their median

    UKIP would ban the burka. Ban halal. Ban the public broadcast of the Islamic call to prayer. Ban disruptive mass-Islamic prayer in public. Ban the creation of new mosques. Demolish mosques that promote extremism. It’s time to clamp down on radical Islam.

    309411718.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.5x their median

    Rest in peace Ann. https://t.co/KhHkFB8ZSI

    32736126.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.1x their median

    UKIP would bring back the death penalty for monsters like Axel Rudakubana.

    318151207.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.0x their median

    UKIP would ban the public broadcast of the Islamic call to prayer.

    29928926.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.3x their median

    Labour can never be trusted. https://t.co/uRnpvfzMCh

    22164036.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.2x their median

    UKIP would remove all public funding for Mosques and reallocate it to invest in and restore our Churches! ✝️🇬🇧

    24626806.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 216K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 69x its own typical post.

What is UKIP's engagement rate on X?
UKIP (@UKIP) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 215,536 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, UKIP sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @UKIP have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @UKIP post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going