Back to @U2's profile

U2 engagement report

@U2 - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.191%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
4.59%
77K views on a typical post
Reach
4.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.162%
124 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3.5K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.191%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 4.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

U2's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.191%, U2 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 132 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 20266.5x their median

    Back home in Dublin… No better way to spend our 50th anniversary than with the beautiful souls of Grafton Street last night 🇮🇪 https://t.co/5SpMsF6fq4

    20K2.7K238250643K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20265.9x their median

    Sometimes I would wonder if Glen Hansard really existed…. Seriously, he was such an angelic presence… not otherworldly…in fact, very present this presence… A smiling rascal if you needed him to be… this most musical and mischievous archangel of Ballymun… no airs, plenty of graces... Of course, Glen was the shining star of the Christmas Eve busk… sometimes the only one reminding the rest of us that Christmas began with a refugee born in a manger, which is hardly a step from living on the street. To be utterly yourself by being more interested in others - a clue for any of us trying out different personas. He really was who you thought he was. He could never walk by a person living rough without checking they were OK… and more than that, he worked very hard so that less people had to live on the streets in the first place. When the crowds got bigger and for safety’s sake Glen had to agree to move the busk to a stage kindly provided outside The Gaiety Theatre, he would say 'we’ll give it our best but it’s not a busk if we’re not on the street!’ …because that’s who he was - a performer at eye level in any situation. The stage was a separation he wouldn’t recognize. Of all the grand and gigantic venues he and The Frames played, you sensed the street was his most favoured place to perform. And street people, his favourite audience. Voice of the streets. A choir of angels in one man. The rest of us blessed to stand there beside our very own and very earthed Angel Gabriel… All of us welcome in his choir, whatever shape or form. ….and I’m telling myself this morning that if he never existed, then he can never cease to exist. For me, he will always be everywhere I see a coin spinning into an open guitar case. May you rest in the peace you gave to so many. Bono

    17K3.1K3112911.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.2x their median

    1976-2026 ∞ https://t.co/X91MvWZMDZ

    15K3.0K3525091.5M viewsView on X
  • May 12, 20265.1x their median

    Hopped a bus in Mexico City, destination: Street of Dreams. ‘Justice an obsession, love is a procession down the street of dreams’ https://t.co/HZYXw0rDXk

    14K3.3K328390648K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.9x their median

    What a privilege it was to return to Mount Temple where our journey first began, 50 years later, and share the stage with the extraordinary young musicians of Music Generation. ❤️ https://t.co/sohWqkmYOl

    15K2.4K200287668K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.4x their median

    Super Bowl XXXVI. 2002. A tribute to the lives lost on September 11, 2001. https://t.co/GRdl9ElSSh

    9.7K1.9K1552471.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.8x their median

    New album Carnaval de Luz available 13th November. “Silencio” out now. https://t.co/Fa2Hea7OrT https://t.co/1U42yll9gD

    7.7K1.4K273459518K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.4x their median

    Somewhere in Mexico City, on a Street of Dreams.. https://t.co/TvjfX2hglG

    7.6K8539456194K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.4x their median

    Every heart is torn. https://t.co/5zu26akYiz

    7.5K7595422119K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 20262.1x their median

    No abandones tus sueños Tus sueños no te abandonarán https://t.co/F6XmXMxOsr

    6.0K1.3K19672143K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.5K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.191%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 4.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

What is U2's engagement rate on X?
U2 (@U2) has an engagement rate of 0.191%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,844,399 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.191%, U2 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @U2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @U2 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going