Ty Beal engagement report
@TyBealPhD - 937K followers on X
Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 937K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.126% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 1084x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Ty Beal sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 79K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 98K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 232K |
| Monday | 0% | 290K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 281K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 252K |
| Thursday | -2% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 254K |
| Saturday | +3% | 228K |
Best tweets
- Jun 28, 20261084x their median
Exactly. And they cannot cite a single name of someone who died out of the “millions” they falsely claim have died. Not a single name!
- Jul 1, 2026573x their median
Elon Musk says that no one died because of his demolition of USAID, and that "Kristof is lying through his teeth." So here I invite him to join me on a visit to Africa to see for himself: https://t.co/TVEoFX8gzj
- Apr 1, 2026114x their median
The cholesterol wars are over. LDL won. New guidelines. Four landmark trials. An oral PCSK9 inhibitor that matches injectables. And data proving we should be treating patients we currently aren't. Here's everything clinicians need to know. 🧵
- Jun 30, 202672x their median
Marco Rubio and Elon Musk claim that no one died from shutting down USAID. Yet the best estimates are between 8–20 million by 2030. We can debate the exact number—but it's clearly in the millions. When confronted by actual names by @NickKristof, who has gone to the villages and talked to the families, Musk's only response was to call him "an utter piece of shit and a liar." Elon Musk is not just out of touch with reality. He is causing real, devastating harm to the world's poorest people.
- Mar 24, 202645x their median
🔥 It's out! We rated 289 foods by nutritional value—here's what we found 👇 Nutrient-dense foods like fish, meat, and non-starchy vegetables top the list. https://t.co/irBLzsMN50
- Apr 2, 202611x their median
Statins reduce heart attacks, strokes and deaths. But is the absolute reduction small? A new analysis looked at people ≥80yo Those on statins had a 31% lower risk of dying (relative risk reduction) and the absolute risk was 17% lower. This illustrates a key principle. https://t.co/m8JhPOqgTd
- Jun 26, 202612x their median
I have difficult news to share. After several challenging years, and a funding round we were unable to close, our company has been declared bankrupt. This is the company behind both @DietDoctor and @JoinHava. If you are a subscriber, I expect your first questions are about your subscription and whether the apps will keep working. Let me answer those directly (this message has also been emailed to all customers). Will the services keep working? Right now, yes. Diet Doctor and Hava are currently still running, and you can keep using them. But I can't guarantee how long. A bankruptcy trustee has taken over the company and will try to sell the apps and websites to a new owner who can keep them running. If a buyer is found quickly, you may not notice any change. If no buyer is found, the services will shut down, possibly very soon. I'll let you know if there's news, though I can't promise advance warning before any shutdown. Your subscription and billing To avoid being charged again for a service whose future is uncertain, you may cancel your subscription at any time. How you do that depends on where you signed up: - Apple App Store: on your iPhone or iPad, open Settings, tap your name, then Subscriptions, and cancel there. - Google Play: open the Play Store app, go to Subscriptions, and cancel there. - If you signed up on our website, https://t.co/r0aBxxWKmw or https://t.co/oFFPbLxmQT, log in there to cancel (for Diet Doctor, then go to your profile and click on “My membership”) Cancelling stops future charges. You keep access until the end of the period you've already paid for. We're also working on pausing any new charges due to the current uncertainty, but to be sure of not being charged, consider cancelling as described above. Refunds I'm not able to promise refunds as the trustee now controls the company's finances, and in a bankruptcy prepaid subscriptions generally cannot be refunded by the company. If you subscribed through the App Store or Google Play, you can request a refund directly from Apple or Google, who decide these case by case. The most reliable way to avoid further cost is to cancel. Your data We don't have an automatic way to export your data. If there's information in the app you'd like to keep, such as your weight history or notes, please save it manually while the service is still online, for example with screenshots. Once a service shuts down, that information may not be recoverable. A small ask If you happen to know a company or person who might want to take over https://t.co/oFFPbLxmQT, https://t.co/r0aBxxWKmw, or the apps and keep them running for users like you, I'd be grateful if you put them in touch with me. My DMs are open. Thank you. Being trusted with people's health is a real privilege. I’m proud of what we built over the years and grateful you were part of it. I still believe, as strongly as ever, that there are better ways to reach metabolic health and a healthy weight than counting calories. Whether through lower-carb eating or a more flexible satiety approach, focusing on food quality tends to work better over the long term. I hope you carry some of that with you, whatever happens to the apps. I hope our services continue under a new owner. If they don't, I hope you got real value from them while they were here. If you have any questions, please reach out. Best, Andreas Eenfeldt Founder & CEO Diet Doctor, Hava
- Jul 22, 20265.5x their median
‘If all else fails, sue.’ This is an astounding new report. We know that big food companies deliberately engineer and market unhealthy products so that we eat too much of them, too often. And lots of you will have seen that this is why multiple lawsuits are beginning in the USA. But what you probably didn’t realise is that it isn’t just people who are harmed by unhealthy food who are using the law. The companies who make unhealthy food are doing it too. But on a MUCH bigger scale...🧵 https://t.co/thYzFueJpC
- May 13, 20264.2x their median
We have a carbon tunnel vision problem in food policy. New paper out today. The short version: when GHG emissions become the only lens for evaluating food systems, we end up with policies that look climate-smart on a spreadsheet and fail in the real world. A few of the things that get lost when CO₂e/kg is the only metric: Nutrition. A large recent intervention trial found participants on the low-emission diet had greater inadequacies in B2, B6, B12, iodine, calcium, zinc, and selenium. Pregnant and lactating women are especially exposed on iron. Any policy that trades modest emissions cuts for worse nutrition in vulnerable groups isn't a sustainability policy—it's a sustainability failure. Scale. Livestock in the West contributes 2.6% of global anthropogenic GHGs. A meat-reducing Westerner saves 1–6% on their total footprint. Diet is not the dominant climate lever in high-income countries. Housing, transport, and digital infrastructure are. Carbon accounting. Biogenic methane from ruminants behaves differently in the atmosphere than fossil CO₂. Treating them as interchangeable under GWP100 misallocates mitigation effort. Stable ruminant herds don't add warming the way new fossil emissions do. Land. Grasslands store 10–30% of global terrestrial soil organic carbon, often deeper and more fire-resilient than forest stocks. Well-managed grazing can sequester carbon while producing food. Tree-centric afforestation, when ill-conceived, can backfire—biodiversity loss, wildfire risk, even net warming from albedo effects in some contexts. The path forward isn't defending the status quo of industrial livestock—the paper is explicit that reform is urgent and desirable. It's building policy on metrics that actually map to climate goals, account for nutrition, and respect regional context.
- May 13, 20263.3x their median
Just published "Arguments in support of [interventionist climate] policies tend to oversimplify the issue, ignoring regional variations, mitigation potential, and broader ecological and nutritional contexts" - here's why 👇 https://t.co/riGfN5o1Xl https://t.co/farinP1Rsd
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 937K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.126% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 1084x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Ty Beal's engagement rate on X?
- Ty Beal (@TyBealPhD) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 937,102 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Ty Beal sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @TyBealPhD have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @TyBealPhD post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.