Back to @TyBealPhD's profile

Ty Beal engagement report

@TyBealPhD - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.019%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
1.02%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
1.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
204
interactions (median)
Saved
0.374%
75 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 204 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 1084x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Ty Beal sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 443 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 28, 20261084x their median

    Exactly. And they cannot cite a single name of someone who died out of the “millions” they falsely claim have died. Not a single name!

    29K4.0K3.2K28112M viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2026417x their median

    Elon Musk says that no one died because of his demolition of USAID, and that "Kristof is lying through his teeth." So here I invite him to join me on a visit to Africa to see for himself: https://t.co/TVEoFX8gzj

    12K3.9K1.9K204625K viewsView on X
  • Apr 1, 202681x their median

    The cholesterol wars are over. LDL won. New guidelines. Four landmark trials. An oral PCSK9 inhibitor that matches injectables. And data proving we should be treating patients we currently aren't. Here's everything clinicians need to know. 🧵

    3.0K433169381.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 202611x their median

    Marco Rubio and Elon Musk claim that no one died from shutting down USAID. Yet the best estimates are between 8–20 million by 2030. We can debate the exact number—but it's clearly in the millions. When confronted by actual names by @NickKristof, who has gone to the villages and talked to the families, Musk's only response was to call him "an utter piece of shit and a liar." Elon Musk is not just out of touch with reality. He is causing real, devastating harm to the world's poorest people.

    1.6K5341521564K viewsView on X
  • Feb 20, 20267.8x their median

    I can't believe it took 2.5 years...but my paper on a new system for rating foods by nutritional value was finally accepted for publication! Nutrient-dense foods like fish, meat, and non-starchy vegetables top the list. https://t.co/WTUmpdDVy5

    1.3K19610628151K viewsView on X
  • Mar 24, 20267.0x their median

    🔥 It's out! We rated 289 foods by nutritional value—here's what we found 👇 Nutrient-dense foods like fish, meat, and non-starchy vegetables top the list. https://t.co/irBLzsMN50

    97018121568245K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 202611x their median

    Statins reduce heart attacks, strokes and deaths. But is the absolute reduction small? A new analysis looked at people ≥80yo Those on statins had a 31% lower risk of dying (relative risk reduction) and the absolute risk was 17% lower. This illustrates a key principle. https://t.co/m8JhPOqgTd

    3093828637K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20266.6x their median

    I have difficult news to share. After several challenging years, and a funding round we were unable to close, our company has been declared bankrupt. This is the company behind both @DietDoctor and @JoinHava. If you are a subscriber, I expect your first questions are about your subscription and whether the apps will keep working. Let me answer those directly (this message has also been emailed to all customers). Will the services keep working? Right now, yes. Diet Doctor and Hava are currently still running, and you can keep using them. But I can't guarantee how long. A bankruptcy trustee has taken over the company and will try to sell the apps and websites to a new owner who can keep them running. If a buyer is found quickly, you may not notice any change. If no buyer is found, the services will shut down, possibly very soon. I'll let you know if there's news, though I can't promise advance warning before any shutdown. Your subscription and billing To avoid being charged again for a service whose future is uncertain, you may cancel your subscription at any time. How you do that depends on where you signed up: - Apple App Store: on your iPhone or iPad, open Settings, tap your name, then Subscriptions, and cancel there. - Google Play: open the Play Store app, go to Subscriptions, and cancel there. - If you signed up on our website, https://t.co/r0aBxxWKmw or https://t.co/oFFPbLxmQT, log in there to cancel (for Diet Doctor, then go to your profile and click on “My membership”) Cancelling stops future charges. You keep access until the end of the period you've already paid for. We're also working on pausing any new charges due to the current uncertainty, but to be sure of not being charged, consider cancelling as described above. Refunds I'm not able to promise refunds as the trustee now controls the company's finances, and in a bankruptcy prepaid subscriptions generally cannot be refunded by the company. If you subscribed through the App Store or Google Play, you can request a refund directly from Apple or Google, who decide these case by case. The most reliable way to avoid further cost is to cancel. Your data We don't have an automatic way to export your data. If there's information in the app you'd like to keep, such as your weight history or notes, please save it manually while the service is still online, for example with screenshots. Once a service shuts down, that information may not be recoverable. A small ask If you happen to know a company or person who might want to take over https://t.co/oFFPbLxmQT, https://t.co/r0aBxxWKmw, or the apps and keep them running for users like you, I'd be grateful if you put them in touch with me. My DMs are open. Thank you. Being trusted with people's health is a real privilege. I’m proud of what we built over the years and grateful you were part of it. I still believe, as strongly as ever, that there are better ways to reach metabolic health and a healthy weight than counting calories. Whether through lower-carb eating or a more flexible satiety approach, focusing on food quality tends to work better over the long term. I hope you carry some of that with you, whatever happens to the apps. I hope our services continue under a new owner. If they don't, I hope you got real value from them while they were here. If you have any questions, please reach out. Best, Andreas Eenfeldt Founder & CEO Diet Doctor, Hava

    225201211182K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    This has to be the most interesting and sobering paper of the year. It estimates the global health impacts across all measurable threats to health to 2100 using amenable disability adjusted life years (DALYs). The leading threat to health? Obesity, including high BMI, poor diet, and low physical activity. Food systems are one of the key ways to address obesity and other leading threats to health in the 21st Century. https://t.co/IXw5yBamDS

    1364320520K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 2026

    ‘If all else fails, sue.’ This is an astounding new report. We know that big food companies deliberately engineer and market unhealthy products so that we eat too much of them, too often. And lots of you will have seen that this is why multiple lawsuits are beginning in the USA. But what you probably didn’t realise is that it isn’t just people who are harmed by unhealthy food who are using the law. The companies who make unhealthy food are doing it too. But on a MUCH bigger scale...🧵 https://t.co/thYzFueJpC

    107551510115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 204 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 1084x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Ty Beal's engagement rate on X?
Ty Beal (@TyBealPhD) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,059,229 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Ty Beal sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TyBealPhD have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @TyBealPhD post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going