Back to @TurnerNovak's profile

Turner Novak 🍌🧢 engagement report

@TurnerNovak - 214K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 214K followers
Per impression
0.453%
8.6K views on a typical post
Reach
4.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
39
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.453% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 111x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Turner Novak 🍌🧢's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Turner Novak 🍌🧢 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 442 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 2026111x their median

    So ready for someone like Eli Raridon to score the first TD and send everyone into full tilt. The annual “NFL is so back” moment.

    4.0K12610445594K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202641x their median

    Zuck has been delivering for millennials at every stage of life. Facebook for checking out everyone in college. Insta for early career when you have disposable income. Muse for mid-career with kids and no time to do personal tasks. You know empty nesting is gonna be lit.

    1.5K703012147K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202640x their median

    Meta at the beginning of the year https://t.co/oZtCjYV5Vc

    1.5K5120557K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202618x their median

    VCs helping Elon in the tunnels so they can invest in the Boring Company https://t.co/lSnEaYluVE

    6721912539K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202615x their median

    JUST IN: SpaceXAI launches Grok 4.7, says it is twice as fast as comparable AI models at half the price

    5184124140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202611x their median

    Numeral has raised a $100M Series C, led by Insight Partners with participation from Salesforce Ventures, Benchmark, Mayfield, Uncork, Y Combinator, FCVC, and Geodesic. This brings our total funding to $157M. @numeral solves U.S. sales tax, VAT, and GST compliance for 3,500+ global businesses, trusted by companies like Supabase, Eight Sleep, and Graza. We’re building the future of tax -- where AI agents, human expertise, and global compliance come together in one system. Since starting the business in 2023, we’ve grown quickly across our core e-commerce and software segments, while expanding into new industries including manufacturing, distribution, and wholesale. There is a lot of work in front of us. Sales tax is more dynamic than ever, with states like California implementing new taxes on software and more states using AI for enforcement. We are hiring across the org from engineering to product, sales, and marketing. And we’ve just opened our new office in NYC. If you are looking for what’s next, I’d love for you to take a peek at our careers page. Excited for the year ahead. And humbled to be working with investors like @insightpartners, @rebeccaliudoyle, @SalesforceVC, @katiessschwartz, @ZKokosa, @MayfieldFund, @SPangulur, @benchmark, @chetanp, @ycombinator, @gustaf, @uncorkcap, @susanwliu, @GeodesicCap, @arvindayyala, @FundersClub, @mittal, @mantisVC, @AlexPallNY, @ShaanVP, @lennysan, @moizali, @ringmybeller, @khency6, @asturnerr, @maariabajwa and so many others.

    294369622108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.3x their median

    David Protein parent company Medici is the latest cpg company to reach a coveted $2B valuation milestone - and the fastest in history to do so, just 24 months Skims is basically the only brand in consumer that holds a candle to medici https://t.co/aB0y6Jf6bs

    27616171565K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.9x their median

    Today, Stablecoin Wallet & Payments are rolling out on @FlexSuperApp. Our early customers are already transacting billions in annualized volume with us.  No more juggling multiple platforms for your fiat and stablecoin operations. You can now hold, send, receive, convert, and spend stablecoins directly through Flex in a 170 countries: > seamless on/off ramps > settlement in seconds > USDC & USDT  > best in class banking with > all popular chains > available 24/7/365 > private banking support  > on-chain credit globally > global visa cards (coming in Q4) If your business runs on both fiat and stablecoins, bring it all under one roof with Flex. Request access to be in the first group.

    22223491454K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20266.7x their median

    hype up your friends who are chasing their dreams > comment on their post > support their business > tell them you’re proud support them just like you support celebrities who don’t even know you exist https://t.co/66NUk1mLeo

    2061931617K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20266.0x their median

    Instinct is the Notion of AI assistants

    170555327K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.453% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 111x its own typical post.

What is Turner Novak 🍌🧢's engagement rate on X?
Turner Novak 🍌🧢 (@TurnerNovak) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 213,756 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Turner Novak 🍌🧢 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TurnerNovak have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TurnerNovak post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going