Back to @Turi_sasu's profile

ツリサス engagement report

@Turi_sasu - 270K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.464%
of 270K followers
Per impression
2.90%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
16.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.257%
111 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.464%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 2.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #c108.

Compared with accounts its own size

ツリサス's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.464%, ツリサス sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 33 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 11, 202657x their median

    https://t.co/BlprcbyN2j

    65K5.2K60491.1M viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 202634x their median

    https://t.co/80oR01wZqO

    39K3.4K2630606K viewsView on X
  • Apr 19, 202633x their median

    けいちゃんエピローグ https://t.co/wRCunFNg5Y

    38K2.9K3815698K viewsView on X
  • Mar 31, 202620x their median

    https://t.co/wO8nc2MF1Q

    23K2.2K1926485K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 202620x their median

    https://t.co/pC3pknV4Ku

    23K1.8K2412385K viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 202618x their median

    https://t.co/sWtpBOLGgg

    21K2.0K2315347K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 202617x their median

    https://t.co/GndeFNUzTu

    20K1.7K910369K viewsView on X
  • Mar 16, 202616x their median

    https://t.co/etosWRGppT

    18K1.8K2310330K viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 202615x their median

    https://t.co/wo2CrfRgLf

    17K1.4K118330K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202613x their median

    最近SpineとAfterEffectsを学ぶ機会があったので短いアニメーションの習作を作ってみました。 ※音が出ます。ご注意ください https://t.co/rCdoAMREnO

    15K1.1K134350K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#c108

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.464%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 2.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is ツリサス's engagement rate on X?
ツリサス (@Turi_sasu) has an engagement rate of 0.464%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 269,741 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.464%, ツリサス sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Turi_sasu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Turi_sasu post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going