Back to @TubeBuddy's profile

TubeBuddy engagement report

@TubeBuddy - 171K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 171K followers
Per impression
0.334%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.334% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 520 interactions, about 65x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #madeonyoutube, #youtube, #youtubegrowth.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #madeonyoutube, #youtube, #youtubegrowth.

Compared with accounts its own size

TubeBuddy's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, TubeBuddy sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video45% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 214 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202665x their median

    100 YOUTUBE VIDEO TITLES THAT ACTUALLY WORK (hint: save this for later) 1. How to [X] in 10 Minutes 2. The Only [X] Guide You Need 3. How I [X] — Step by Step 4. [X] for Complete Beginners 5. Stop Doing [X]. Do This Instead 6. The Fastest Way to [X] 7. How to [X] Without [obstacle] 8. I Learned [X] So You Don't Have To 9. [X]: What Nobody Tells You 10. The Right Way to [X] 11. I Did [X] Every Day for 30 Days 12. 24 Hours of [X] 13. I Tried [X] for a Week 14. Can I [X] in One Day? 15. [X] Until I [goal] 16. I Quit [X] for 30 Days 17. Last to [X] Wins 18. I Survived [X] 19. 7 Days, No [X] 20. I [X] Every Day Until It Worked 21. The Video That Changed Everything 22. I Almost Quit [X] 23. What Really Happened With [X] 24. My Biggest Mistake 25. Nobody Warned Me About [X] 26. How I Lost [X] 27. The Day I [X] 28. I Wasn't Going to Post This 29. Why I Left [X] 30. The Truth About [X] 31. [X] Is Overrated 32. Unpopular Opinion: [X] 33. We Need to Talk About [X] 34. Everyone Is Wrong About [X] 35. I'll Die on This Hill: [X] 36. [X] Is Ruining [Y] 37. Hot Take: [X] 38. Why I Stopped [X] 39. Stop Recommending [X] 40. The Problem With [X] 41. 10 [X] That Actually Work 42. Ranking Every [X] 43. 5 [X] You're Doing Wrong 44. Best to Worst: [X] 45. 7 Things I Wish I Knew About [X] 46. Every [X], Ranked 47. 3 [X] That Changed My [Y] 48. The Only 5 [X] You Need 49. 10 [X] Under $[N] 50. Tier List: [X] 51. I Tested Every [X] 52. Does [X] Actually Work? 53. I Spent $[N] on [X] 54. [X] vs [Y]: The Real Test 55. What Happens If You [X] 56. I Ran [X] for 100 Days 57. Cheap vs Expensive [X] 58. I Let [X] Decide for a Week 59. Testing Viral [X] 60. Is [X] Worth It? 61. [X] Review: 6 Months Later 62. Don't Buy [X] Until You Watch This 63. [X] vs [Y]: Which Should You Get? 64. The Honest [X] Review 65. I Used [X] Every Day for a Year 66. [X]: Worth the Hype? 67. Everything Wrong With [X] 68. Why I Returned [X] 69. The Best [X] for [audience] 70. I Bought Every [X] So You Don't 71. 5 Mistakes Killing Your [X] 72. Why Your [X] Isn't Working 73. Beginners Always Get [X] Wrong 74. If I Started [X] Today 75. What I'd Do Differently 76. The Mistake That Cost Me [X] 77. Avoid These [X] Mistakes 78. You're Using [X] Wrong 79. Stop Wasting Money on [X] 80. Read This Before You Start [X] 81. How This Video Was Made 82. A Day in My [X] 83. What [X] Actually Looks Like 84. My Entire [X] Setup 85. How Much I Make From [X] 86. The Real Cost of [X] 87. Inside My [X] 88. What I Do Before [X] 89. My [X] Routine, Unedited 90. 24 Hours With Me 91. Nobody Talks About This 92. This Shouldn't Work, But It Does 93. The [X] Nobody Uses 94. I Found Something Weird in [X] 95. Why [X] Disappeared 96. This Changes Everything About [X] 97. The Secret to [X] Is Boring 98. You've Been Lied to About [X] 99. What They Don't Show You 100. This Took Me 3 Years to Learn

    4485810427K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202624x their median

    You have until Feb 1, 2027 to hit 4,000 watch hours. After that it's 8,000. That's 18 months. Plenty of time... if you start now.

    154727525K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    Two YouTube rule changes landed this week. One helps you. One doesn't. šŸ“ˆ Views got easier. A view now counts the moment your video starts playing — no minimum watch time (across VOD, Shorts and Live.) šŸ’° Monetization got harder. YouTube is doubling the bar to join the Partner Program, effective Feb 1, 2027. New applicants will need 1,000 subs plus either 8,000 watch hours in a year or 20 million Shorts views in 90 days. Don't judge your channel by the view count this month. Track watch hours... that's the one that still decides whether you get paid. Where are you at on the 8,000 hours? šŸ‘‡ #YouTubeMonetization #ContentCreator #CreatorEconomy #TubeBuddy

    62517312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20269.5x their median

    YouTube just doubled the bar to get monetized. Starting Feb 1, 2027: • 8,000 watch hours (was 4,000) • 20M Shorts views/90 days (was 10M) • 1,000 subs unchanged Biggest YPP change since 2018.

    5661319.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20268.0x their median

    25 VIDEO IDEAS FOR WHEN YOU HAVE ZERO IDEAS (hint: save these) 1. React to your oldest video 2. Answer your most-asked comment question 3. Day in the life 4. Rank your own videos worst to best 5. Try a trend from a different niche 6. Redo your first video with what you know now 7. Behind the scenes of your setup 8. Beginner mistakes you made (and fixed) 9. What you'd do if you started over today 10. Interview someone in your niche 11. Budget vs expensive version of something you do 12. Answer "is [X] worth it" for your niche 13. Show your actual process, unedited 14. Debunk a myth in your space 15. Test a tool/product everyone's talking about 16. Collab — swap audiences with a similar creator 17. Explain your biggest failure 18. Show your income/growth (as much as you're comfortable) 19. Compare two ways to do the same thing 20. Answer "what I wish I knew before starting" 21. Live reaction to your own analytics 22. Recreate a viral video in your niche 23. Turn a comment argument into a full video 24. Show your workspace/gear tour 25. Ask your audience what they want next (and deliver in real time)

    555405.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20267.5x their median

    OLD YouTube vs NEW YouTube Three things that flipped šŸ‘‡ šŸ“¦ Packaging: you used to write titles for the search bar. Now the title and thumbnail ARE the pitch. ā±ļø Length: you used to stretch everything to 10:00 for mid-rolls. But padding kills retention now, and retention is what you need. šŸ”Ž Discovery: subscriber count used to be the whole game. Now most views come from Browse and Suggested, which means every upload starts cold and has to earn it on its own. The channels struggling right now are usually running an old playbook. Which one of these are you still doing? šŸ‘‡ Follow @TubeBuddy for weekly growth tips. #YouTubeTips #YouTubeGrowth #ContentCreator #YouTubeAlgorithm #CreatorEconomy #VideoMarketing #YouTubeSEO #GrowOnYouTube

    516306.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.4x their median

    Your title matters more than your thumbnail. Fight me.

    3521047.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20266.1x their median

    🚨 YouTube is doubling the bar to join the Partner Program. NEW APPLICANTS ONLY: - 8,000 watch hours (up from 4,000), or - 20M Shorts views in 90 days (up from 10M) - Subs stay at 1,000 Already a partner? You're locked in. Effective Feb 1, 2027. https://t.co/RWWnVYPz6W

    3221325.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20266.0x their median

    YouTube's rolling out AI thumbnail generation inside Studio. Early access — worth checking if it's live for you.

    354638.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.9x their median

    15 THINGS EVERY SUCCESSFUL CHANNEL HAS IN COMMON (save this!) 1. A clear niche — viewers know exactly what they're getting 2. Consistent upload schedule (even if it's just weekly) 3. Strong first 5 seconds — hook before intro 4. Thumbnails with 3 words or less 5. A recognizable host energy or personality 6. Titles that promise a specific outcome 7. They reply to comments in the first hour 8. Retention-tested pacing — no long intros 9. A signature sign-off or catchphrase 10. They study their own Analytics tab weekly 11. Repurpose long-form into shorts, not the other way around 12. They collab up, not just across 13. End screens that lead to ONE next action 14. They know their CTR benchmark and chase it 15. They never stop testing new formats This is what separates channels that plateau at 10K from channels that scale past 1M... are YOU ready to scale your channel?

    415104.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#madeonyoutube#youtube#youtubegrowth#contentcreator#contentoutliers

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.334% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 520 interactions, about 65x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #madeonyoutube, #youtube, #youtubegrowth.

What is TubeBuddy's engagement rate on X?
TubeBuddy (@TubeBuddy) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 171,243 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, TubeBuddy sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TubeBuddy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TubeBuddy post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going