Tubbo engagement report
@TubboTWO - 1.7M followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.5K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 4.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Tubbo's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.269%, Tubbo sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.046% to 0.318%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.001% |
| 25th percentile | 0.006% |
| 50th percentile | 0.046% |
| 75th percentile | 0.318% |
| 90th percentile | 2.67% |
| 99th percentile | 366.2% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | 0% | 14K |
| 01:00 UTC | +3% | 15K |
| 02:00 UTC | -1% | 14K |
| 03:00 UTC | -2% | 15K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 12K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 12K |
| 06:00 UTC | -7% | 13K |
| 07:00 UTC | -6% | 14K |
| 08:00 UTC | -7% | 16K |
| 09:00 UTC | -2% | 19K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 20K |
| 11:00 UTC | -2% | 22K |
| 12:00 UTC | -1% | 24K |
| 13:00 UTC | +1% | 27K |
| 14:00 UTC | -2% | 28K |
| 15:00 UTC | -1% | 30K |
| 16:00 UTC | -1% | 29K |
| 17:00 UTC | -1% | 28K |
| 18:00 UTC | +1% | 25K |
| 19:00 UTC | 0% | 23K |
| 20:00 UTC | 0% | 21K |
| 21:00 UTC | +1% | 19K |
| 22:00 UTC | +1% | 16K |
| 23:00 UTC | +1% | 15K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +9% | 56K |
| Monday | +8% | 72K |
| Tuesday | +1% | 93K |
| Wednesday | -4% | 77K |
| Thursday | -3% | 70K |
| Friday | -6% | 71K |
| Saturday | +2% | 62K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 43% of posts | +79% | +73% to +84% | 5.7K |
| Outbound link | 14% of posts | -49% | -50% to -47% | 6.0K |
| Typical length | - | -7% | -8% to -5% | 8.9K |
- 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 117 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 30, 202614x their median
Happy last day of pride month guys this one is for the fucking gays https://t.co/jT3TglQpuT
- Jul 18, 202614x their median
https://t.co/SMxK5VdXIR
- Jul 11, 202613x their median
is it safe to say I'm really not sure im a fan of this whole larp account trend thing? it just feels off
- Jul 1, 20263.8x their median
these perverts in my chat man oml πππ https://t.co/9wbRd9TTwU
- Jun 7, 20263.5x their median
WHAT THE HELL LIFESTEAL!?!?!??!??! π° https://t.co/pBMh0M72Ho
- Jun 18, 20263.1x their median
Shit like this really pisses me off man. Twitch repeatedly tells creators how they don't make money and that live stream platforms aren't profitable and they use this naritive to do predatory monetization changes and justify bad revenue splits for almost every creator on the platform. Then so shamelessly they will publicly burn money on the most expensive form of cloud computing to create a feature that no one fucking asked for and have it enabled by default for everyone. They did this with A.I clipping that 0 people use and now A.I stream summaries. All I want @Twitch is for there to be at least one person on the product team that actually uses the platform regurally and doesn't just work on it. This also begs bigger questions like what is the point in building a global team of partner managers, who's main job is to collect feedback and help creators, if your not going to bother listening to them.
- Aug 14, 20263.0x their median
HERE ARE YOUR TEAMS π₯π₯ https://t.co/5F6dqWE0XK
- Jun 6, 20262.9x their median
no stream today it's my 6 month anniversary π
- Aug 8, 20262.9x their median
QSMP Gartic phone tomorrow but everytime I fuck up someones masterpeace I slam 15 shots and start crying
- Jun 10, 20262.7x their median
Genuinely is something in the air rn?! Every time I open this app itβs a notes app screenshot or a link to a google docs or a discord announcement screenshot Iβm tired guys please think of the dyslexics voice notes anyone?!?!!?!? ππππ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.5K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 4.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
- What is Tubbo's engagement rate on X?
- Tubbo (@TubboTWO) has an engagement rate of 0.269%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,678,672 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.269%, Tubbo sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @TubboTWO have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @TubboTWO post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.