Back to @Truthpole's profile

T R U T H P O L E engagement report

@Truthpole - 168K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.061%
of 168K followers
Per impression
1.40%
7.3K views on a typical post
Reach
4.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
102
interactions (median)
Saved
0.205%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 168K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 85x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

T R U T H P O L E's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.061%, T R U T H P O L E sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 224 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 202685x their median

    Elon Musk is greater than Thomas Edison. https://t.co/erDN7BaGMu

    6.7K956768267523K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202676x their median

    🚨 BREAKING : An anonymous 4chan post dated 1 August 2026 predicted a pandemic for this fall. This week a worker at the Irkutsk anti-plague institute in Siberia died after a suspected lab illness. Darya Shipilova, 28, died the night of 2 October. A neighboring governor first wrote plague, then "possibly."

    6.6K83123296677K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202647x their median

    We judged her way too soon https://t.co/M7gWkVFReg

    4.4K30110330321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202643x their median

    🚨 NEW - Pyramids in Ghuizou China - for decades , the People in this region of China were Gaslit by the Authorities saying these are Natural Formations. My verdict is that they are NOT Natural formations , but the area should be surveyed and escavated properly. I'm 98% sure that these are NOT natural formations. You don't need to be an archeologist to see it.

    3.7K5929845231K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202641x their median

    Somehow this isn’t AI https://t.co/3sUIHrmmRq

    3.8K2068028306K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202640x their median

    🚨 Celebrities who say they encountered shapeshifting reptilians https://t.co/95e9knvqk2

    3.5K487952386K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202639x their median

    🚨David Grusch told Rogan a crashed tic-tac held dead grays and living reptilians over 7 feet. He says U.S. personnel were killed, and survivors were shot as a threat. Secondhand. He has not seen them. He still calls it NHI-on-NHI conflict. -JRE https://t.co/KduiT0TsGe

    3.4K37819623124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202630x their median

    🚨 BREAKING - Daily Mail reports of a UFO during the Space X launch Today Remember what Elon Musk said about Aliens? , He has said that with thousands of SpaceX satellites he would know if aliens were here, and that he would post the proof on X. The object sat on his own feed. https://t.co/TgMHEpsWp4

    2.5K35514423189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202629x their median

    🚨 DMT laser “Matrix code” Experiment - popularized by Danny Goler. SpaceTalk filmed a live DMT laser session. A participant named Debbie is coached as she “goes,” the phrase used when the state hits. in that state of altered Perception / Consciousness, a laser line can appear filled with scrolling symbols, like code on a surface. Viewers call it the matrix layer. Others say it is the visual system locking onto interference, not a hidden OS. Original source credit: Cosmetrics session footage of the DMT laser experiment associated with Danny Goler.

    2.5K28814022192K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202615x their median

    🚨 TOMORROW COULD BE THE DATE- OCT 7th - Chris Bledsoe and AJ on Why Files set a clock: 7 October 2026, 5:30 a.m., the hour they say Regulus turns red and a new knowledge opens. Original source credit: Why Files, AJ with Chris Bledsoe, YouTube clip BYzXPxktcuM. https://t.co/TcDHvwIDKA

    1.2K17111819119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 168K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 85x its own typical post.

What is T R U T H P O L E's engagement rate on X?
T R U T H P O L E (@Truthpole) has an engagement rate of 0.061%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 168,047 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.061%, T R U T H P O L E sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Truthpole have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Truthpole post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going