Back to @TrustlessState's profile

David Hoffman engagement report

@TrustlessState - 263K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 263K followers
Per impression
0.729%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
11.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
222
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.37/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 222 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.729% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 19% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 50x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

David Hoffman's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, David Hoffman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 270 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 20, 202250x their median

    Crypto wasn't created to make you rich It was created to set you free.

    7.7K1.4K1.8K289View on X
  • Sep 23, 202622x their median

    🚨 THIS IS NOT LOOKING GOOD. Entire US bond yield curve is going parabolic. US01Y is at a 25-month high US02Y is at a 28-month high US05Y is at a 19-year high US10Y is at a 19-year high US20Y is also at a 22-year high US30Y is at a 19-year high Higher yields across the board mean higher borrowing costs for the government, businesses, and consumers, and that's bad news for both the economy and stocks.

    3.7K719252165839K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 202626x their median

    https://t.co/5EOn4y2pdx

    2.0K2046264682.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202611x their median

    INTEL: KYC should collect less personal data and use zero-knowledge proofs to verify compliance without revealing names, income or addresses, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce says https://t.co/vW6wSfoMwI

    1.9K2409197138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202610x their median

    Tomorrow, one possible outcome after the Fed hiked, is that we may discover that tightening doesn’t lower long-term yields. If that happens, it would confirm that fiscal is the culprit in the whodunnit saga. By raising the government’s marginal funding cost, a rate hike enlarges future interest deficits and increases the amount of debt Treasury must place with private investors. If investors doubt that fiscal policy will offset those costs, the term premium could rise, pushing long yields higher and reinforcing the deterioration in debt service.

    1.8K21814766471K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.4x their median

    Venice... - An incredible product - High user growth rate - Cypherpunk values - Positively impacts the real world - Direct token value capture - Verifiable revenue data all onchain We finally have quality projects with quality tokens Congrats $VVV holders! https://t.co/otZ3C3kHYM

    6665230741K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.3x their median

    $NEAR breaks $3.00 and its 200w ma! https://t.co/kP5sZcELpR

    6513235628K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.0x their median

    We are in alt szn btw, and the hour is later than you think

    53317881983K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.9x their median

    ZEC breaks ATH on no news Right?? I don't see a catalyst here. Its just up season https://t.co/XwpxAFoEw8

    5372779433K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20262.6x their median

    $ZEC $HYPE $VVV $NEAR Most alive tokens in crypto rn

    460227019242K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 222 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.729% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 19% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 50x its own typical post.

What is David Hoffman's engagement rate on X?
David Hoffman (@TrustlessState) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 263,182 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, David Hoffman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TrustlessState have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TrustlessState post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going