Back to @TrustlessState's profile

David Hoffman engagement report

@TrustlessState - 258K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.049%
of 258K followers
Per impression
1.09%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
127
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 127 interactions against 258K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 88x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

David Hoffman's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, David Hoffman sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 232 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 20, 202288x their median

    Crypto wasn't created to make you rich It was created to set you free.

    7.7K1.4K1.8K286View on X
  • May 26, 202626x their median

    https://t.co/5EOn4y2pdx

    2.0K2046264682.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.8x their median

    Venice... - An incredible product - High user growth rate - Cypherpunk values - Positively impacts the real world - Direct token value capture - Verifiable revenue data all onchain We finally have quality projects with quality tokens Congrats $VVV holders! https://t.co/otZ3C3kHYM

    4332620724K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.2x their median

    We're crackin 80k tonight arn't we

    247330012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    ETH @ the 200 week https://t.co/4lXynW6RSj

    207940119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.7x their median

    BTC hasn't moved like this since the 2024 election Almost touched 80k last night! https://t.co/jExjrUsgXc

    188319112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.6x their median

    Not sure why people are dunking on @blknoiz06 for calling out the Hunter Biden laptop memecoin. He already admitted he was wrong on celebrity memecoins and said he's done supporting them. He learned, pivoted, and is now consistent.

    151247215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Sent an email to @AndrewDudum to invite him on Bankless to discuss tokenized $HIMS on RH Chain but TBH, I doubt this whole thing is worth his time. $3.5m of tokenized stock on a $6.5b company is nothing. This needs to 100x before it impacts HIMS capital markets. Still tiny. Am I wrong?

    134845122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Just recorded with @AustinBarack who made a fantastic point about $HYPE $LIT and $PUMP All these are positively reflexive to crypto trading volume and capital flows into crypto As total market cap of crypto increases, the revenue of these products will also grow Up

    133812111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    BTC pushing for new highs on a Monday morning is so fucking bullish reflexivity is reflexing https://t.co/ulVcsXFTPh

    1311809.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 127 interactions against 258K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 88x its own typical post.

What is David Hoffman's engagement rate on X?
David Hoffman (@TrustlessState) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 258,422 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, David Hoffman sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TrustlessState have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TrustlessState post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going