Back to @TrueGeordieTG's profile

True Geordie engagement report

@TrueGeordieTG - 523K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 523K followers
Per impression
0.161%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
4.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
41
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 523K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 215x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nufc, #ad, #localhero.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #nufc, #ad, #localhero.

Compared with accounts its own size

True Geordie's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, True Geordie sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link53% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 53% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 165 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026215x their median

    Welcome to your new home, Nico 🫶 https://t.co/M9R0Grn9sq

    8.0K6177995698K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026187x their median

    Intense start to the Jaissle era. 🫡 https://t.co/OttedDkgpV

    6.8K4062861671.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026104x their median

    The way Man Utd use the media after failing to deliver in a transfer window is more like a political party than a football club. It’s just a load of waffle to calm the fans down, I see why their fans get so wound up by it tbf.

    3.8K421040120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202683x their median

    🚨Newcastle are considering a move for Marseille midfielder Pierre Emile-Højbjerg. 🇩🇰 The Danish international is valued around £15m and could be an option for #NUFC, who are looking to add experience to their squad following the departure of Bruno Guimarães. 🤔 The 31-year-old is one midfield option Newcastle are exploring…

    2.4K1555573022.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202682x their median

    When Man City went down to 10 men Elliot Anderson became 2 players. Absolute BEAST of a performance.

    3.2K1060151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202657x their median

    🚨 Joe Willock & Jacob Murphy are both staying at Newcatle United after the club turned down offers. ❌ Besiktas got up to £17m for Willock, and Nottingham Forest made a £10m offer for Murphy — but Matthias Jaissle has been impressed with both players. ⚽️ Willock is seen as an option to Fernandez-Pardo in the no.10 role, while Murphy’s experience and character something the new manager feels is important for the season ahead. #NUFC

    1.9K92237126796K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202644x their median

    We need financial rules in the premier league to prevent what Man City did and they deserve to be punished. However the current rules are anti-competitive and exist only to stop ‘new money’ disrupting the legacy clubs’ stranglehold on success. We need a fair system. https://t.co/5ddKZwJ6ar

    1.5K231067760K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202640x their median

    Just watched Nico González first interview on the NUFC website. He spoke very highly of Matthias Jaissle, saying this was his 5th club but it was the first time a manager has made him feel so important and valued before signing and how impressed he was by Jaissle. Love that 👏🏼

    1.6K340592K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202638x their median

    5 years on after becoming the “richest” club in the league, Newcastle have just finished in the same position as Mike Ashley’s final season. The premier league rules are working exactly as intended. New money is banned from challenging the red cartel.

    1.4K129069107K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202637x their median

    🚨💣 Nick Woltemade: MAN OF THE MATCH. He created SEVEN CHANCES and scored ONE goal. 🇩🇪✨ https://t.co/1v1HWzBXHE

    1.4K52271580K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nufc#ad#localhero

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 523K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 215x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nufc, #ad, #localhero.

What is True Geordie's engagement rate on X?
True Geordie (@TrueGeordieTG) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 522,880 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, True Geordie sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TrueGeordieTG have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TrueGeordieTG post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going