Trezor engagement report
@Trezor - 248K followers on X
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 80 interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.416% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 53% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 110x its own typical post.
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Trezor's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.033%, Trezor sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 20% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 402 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 2026110x their median
Our third-party e-mail provider has been breached. Please be aware that the email named ‘Critical Security Alert: STM32 Entropy Vulnerability’ is not coming from us, and it’s a phishing attempt. Do not click on any link. We have taken down the domain, and we are investigating the situation, including how the hackers got access to our legit domain.
- Jul 31, 202648x their median
Trezor users: your funds are safe. The recent Coldcard issue is limited to their own custom firmware and how some of their devices generated randomness. Trezor does not share that code. We have always mixed multiple independent sources of randomness together (device hardware + host + secure elements on newer models). We are truly sorry for everyone who has lost bitcoin. Stay safe. Read more on how Trezor generates entropy here: https://t.co/Nj6xveBQJk
- Aug 3, 202626x their median
12 years ago, we launched the world’s first hardware wallet. Since then, one thing hasn't changed: our commitment to helping you stay in control and keep your crypto safe. Grab a Trezor today. Up to 20% off on Trezor hardware wallets. https://t.co/TFxG4fpId6
- Aug 4, 202623x their median
Following the Coldcard vulnerability disclosure, we're already seeing an increase in phishing attempts. Stay alert for scams ⚠️ • Never share your wallet backup, aka recovery seed (12/20/24 words) • Only enter your wallet backup directly on your Trezor device during recovery • Trezor will never contact you asking for your wallet backup • Never follow wallet-migration instructions from unsolicited emails, messages or phone calls Trezor devices are not affected by the Coldcard incident.
- Aug 5, 202614x their median
Trezor devices are not affected by the Coldcard vulnerability. We’ve answered your key questions about who may need to move funds, how Trezor backups work, and how to avoid related scams. More info: https://t.co/tmW5Hy39cn Full FAQ below 🧵 [1/12]
- Aug 20, 20266.4x their median
Stay alert for scams ⚠️ Please remember: • Trezor will never call, email, or send you letters asking for your wallet backup, aka recovery seed (12, 20, or 24 words) • Never share your wallet backup with anyone • Only enter your wallet backup directly on your Trezor device during recovery • Trezor support will never ask for your wallet backup • Never follow wallet-migration instructions from unsolicited emails, messages, or phone calls There are websites impersonating Trezor, including fake sites appearing in sponsored search results. These sites can look extremely convincing. Entering your wallet backup on one of them could result in your funds being stolen. Don't assume a sponsored search result is legitimate. Always verify that you're using the official Trezor website: https://t.co/RXPErKPWED
- Aug 21, 20265.2x their median
HyperEVM is now supported on Trezor. ️ Manage HYPE and HyperEVM assets while keeping your keys offline and every transaction verified on your Trezor device. Try it now! @HyperliquidX https://t.co/qPUIapzE2b
- Aug 19, 20264.4x their median
These events changed Bitcoin forever 🧵 1⃣ January 3, 2009 Satoshi Nakamoto mined the Genesis Block — Block #0. Embedded in it was a message: "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" [1/5]
- Sep 7, 20264.3x their median
📌 AI made finding bugs cheap, but it didn’t make responsible disclosure optional. Finding and exploiting vulnerabilities has never been easier. A few hours of prompting now does what used to take a skilled researcher weeks. Unfortunately, defenders no longer enjoy the asymmetry they relied on. Security is still a cat-and-mouse game, but with many more cats, the user suffers. Which is exactly why the process around disclosure matters more than ever. How it works, and it is not complicated: ➤ A researcher finds a bug and contacts the vendor privately. ➤ The vendor reproduces, acknowledges, and both sides agree on a timeline. 90 days is the common default, more or less depending on severity, capacity to fix... ➤ During that window both sides keep it secret while the vendor fixes and ships. ➤ Once users are protected, both sides publish. The ecosystem learns. The researcher usually gets paid. The issue now is the barrier is so low that anyone can surface a finding with no security background, and some skip straight to the audience: ❗Presenting a reproduction of an already-fixed bug as a live compromise. ❗Full disclosure of a bug that is not fixed yet. ❗"Critical vulnerability found" teasers, dripping details for engagement. Call it what it is: attention farming with someone else's risk. When the bug sits between a user and their funds, this is reckless. Especially in crypto, where there is no chargeback. But the damage doesn't require live funds to be at stake. Manufactured panic causes harm of its own, because it drives people away from self-custody, and that damages the whole ecosystem. So I have three asks: 1️⃣ For users: software and hardware have bugs, always. The single most effective thing you can do is stay updated and follow basic security hygiene. That has never mattered more than today. The time between releases and malicious actors exploiting the vulnerabilities have shrunk dramatically due to LLMs and that one can't afford to be passive and postpone security updates any more 2️⃣ For new researchers with a fresh model and a real, validated finding: welcome, we need you. Use the vendor's disclosure process. That is not bureaucracy. It is the difference between making the ecosystem safer and putting users in the crosshairs for a few likes. Remember that security communication must be accurate and proportionate. State the severity, affected versions, and fix status in the first sentence, not the tenth. 3️⃣ And to everyone building in this industry, vendors and researchers alike: let's make coordinated disclosure the norm we defend out loud, not the fine print. Reward the researchers who do it right. Refuse to amplify the ones who trade user safety for reach. This is how we win, together. Some of the actors already support the initiative. @Ledger @Trezor @FoundationHQ @AnchorWatch @_SEAL_Org and others Spread the message.
- Sep 8, 20263.4x their median
Smart contract transactions can be complex. Clear Signing makes them easier to understand. Your Trezor decodes supported EVM transactions and shows the action, tokens, amounts, and destination on its trusted screen. See it. Verify it. Sign with confidence. https://t.co/oczZ3E0uco
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 80 interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.416% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 53% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 110x its own typical post.
- What is Trezor's engagement rate on X?
- Trezor (@Trezor) has an engagement rate of 0.033%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 247,790 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.033%, Trezor sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Trezor have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Trezor post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.