Trellix engagement report
@Trellix - 240K followers on X
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.129% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.643% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #awssummits, #govware, #teamtrellix.
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #awssummits, #govware, #teamtrellix.
Compared with accounts its own size
Trellix's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Trellix sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 219 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 18, 20267.0x their median
Featured in @The_Cyber_News: @TrellixARC research on "Ghost SPNs"—how attackers abuse delegated AD permissions for stealthy, low-trace Kerberoasting attacks. Read more. https://t.co/e81daprwLj
- Aug 31, 20266.0x their median
Think Kerberoasting targets only high-privilege service accounts? Think again. 🚨 Attackers are abusing Active Directory SPNs on regular user accounts to sneak past traditional security filters. See how AI + NDR stops it early: https://t.co/B2H6nRG39H https://t.co/7SFVOiRpgG
- Apr 14, 20265.0x their median
🛑 Stop DCSync attacks before attackers gain Golden Ticket 🎫 persistence into your AD. Trellix NDR uses behavioral analytics to catch unauthorized replication from non-DC hosts. No signatures required. 🔗 https://t.co/WE2gqUoP71 https://t.co/0XNu6V3F0n
- Sep 27, 20264.5x their median
State actors are targeting critical infrastructure, such as telecom & energy. 🛰️ Part two of our series explores these threats & the four pillars of continuous readiness. Read now: https://t.co/etWpTAuOgt
- Sep 3, 20263.5x their median
Lazarus Group is actively exploiting a Windows kernel zero-day ⚠️. See the breakdown of this and 6 other critical active bugs in our August 2026 Bug Report 🛡️👇 https://t.co/YNjdDJlwNO https://t.co/KaRPwjDEUp
- Apr 17, 20263.5x their median
NDR uses ML and analytics to proactively hunt down hidden threats and zero-day attacks across IT, OT, and cloud. Learn how: https://t.co/zzUAgcOEYm https://t.co/VfodhQ00M4
- Sep 22, 20263.0x their median
AI powers autonomous breaches, from GTG-1002 espionage to $25M deepfake heists. 📱 The final part of our series examines five AI threat campaigns & why we must verify intent. Read now: https://t.co/E8didPbxzR https://t.co/kekPPwcpgO
- Aug 24, 20263.0x their median
We’re excited to welcome David Pieterse (COO-GTM) and David Soto (CISO) to #TeamTrellix! 🤝 Together, they bring powerful leadership to drive our go-to-market execution, strategic partnerships, and enterprise security. https://t.co/vStbQa2o8I https://t.co/sqtmGdg2dN
- Apr 9, 20262.5x their median
🚪Misconfigurations open the door for attackers, allowing a single script to compromise networks without credentials. Read to learn how Trellix Helix slams it shut by chronologically linking multi-source telemetry to expose the complete kill chain. 🔗 https://t.co/DaYakM2uSA https://t.co/z7dz9S7HJa
- Sep 25, 20262.0x their median
How do you catch hackers who change their disguises 🎭 to slip past your scanners and access your Active Directory? You track their behavior! Read our latest blog to learn more: https://t.co/aaaTY4GlUX https://t.co/SIaOoAhnHP
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.129% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.643% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #awssummits, #govware, #teamtrellix.
- What is Trellix's engagement rate on X?
- Trellix (@Trellix) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 240,237 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Trellix sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Trellix have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Trellix post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.