Back to @Treadstone71LLC's profile

Treadstone 71 engagement report

@Treadstone71LLC - 257K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 257K followers
Per impression
0%
256 views on a typical post
Reach
0.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 257K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 256 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions. Recurring topics include #cyberintelligence, #govcon, #analyticwriting.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #cyberintelligence, #govcon, #analyticwriting.

Compared with accounts its own size

Treadstone 71's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Treadstone 71 sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link94% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 94% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 223 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026

    🚨MASSIVE: Illinois Governor JB Pritzker says it’s time for Democrats to FIGHT BACK, launching Ready for the Fight, a new PAC to elect Democrats up and down the ballot. His message: STOP playing defense. Compete and fight EVERYWHERE. It’s time to take our country BACK. LFG. https://t.co/Ew6QsUnvRX

    1.5K4574416449K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Canada launched counter-tariffs on $27.6 billion of US goods, hours after Trump moved to ban Bombardier. Canada is partnering with Sweden's Saab and Bombardier on defense projects; would benefit Canadian and Ukrainian defence, triggering Trump retaliation. https://t.co/hsU3I142wr

    3768233104K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2026

    The Mind Domain: People Intelligence, Narrative Intelligence, and Cognitive Warfare - A Practitioner's Field Doctrine https://t.co/LjuanOdgII https://t.co/a1wezpj58T

    6201815 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Advanced Structured Analytic Techniques. Thirty techniques for $1,499, under the card threshold with $13,501 to spare. The cheapest way to make an analyst dangerous before fiscal close. #SATs #IntelAnalysis #GovCon https://t.co/l3VyaJgUo5

    1000128 viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Cognitive Warfare Readiness Drill: two to three days against your team's real narrative exposure. Built for allied commands and enterprise. Fixed quote on request, delivery window by arrangement. #CognitiveWarfare #InfluenceOps https://t.co/l3VyaJgUo5

    1000380 viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    $99,990 buys five hundred seats for twelve months. The full online catalog, one annual invoice, funds obligated before September 30 or before December 31. Pick the deadline that fits your fiscal year. #GovCon #CyberIntelligence https://t.co/l3VyaJgUo5

    1000321 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    US Election - Managed Erosion.pdf https://t.co/GdItAb7w2T

    000032 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    The ASA Evidence Standard Grading evidence, deception, and endgame confidence in intelligence work. The two-axis Admiralty code lets a well-built denial and a corroborated attribution sit at the same grade https://t.co/GzUvytN6dt

    000098 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Cognitive Warfare Monitor Original assessments. Graded sources. Every week. A standing watch on what adversaries say and spread. Each week the Monitor tracks the narratives that matter to your  https://t.co/NrhWv2hcAv

    000085 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Tier 1 Analyst: the Big Four plus seven actors at eight-sub-index depth. $25,000 on an annual invoice, and the October 5 refresh lands on your desk under embargo before the public sees it. #ThreatIntel #CTI https://t.co/l3VyaJgUo5

    0000145 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cyberintelligence#govcon#analyticwriting#cissp#cognitivewarfare

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 257K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 256 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions. Recurring topics include #cyberintelligence, #govcon, #analyticwriting.

What is Treadstone 71's engagement rate on X?
Treadstone 71 (@Treadstone71LLC) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 257,133 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Treadstone 71 sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Treadstone71LLC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Treadstone71LLC post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going