Back to @Transangelsxxx's profile

TransAngels Official engagement report

@Transangelsxxx - 351K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.134%
of 351K followers
Per impression
1.41%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
9.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
466
interactions (median)
Saved
0.356%
118 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 466 interactions against 351K followers, an engagement rate of 0.134%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TransAngels Official's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.134%, TransAngels Official sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link47% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 157 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202635x their median

    πŸ’¦ GET A FREE WEEK πŸ’¦ CLICK HERE NOW ➑️ https://t.co/uYZLl2lbJ4 😜 You think you can just leave Foxxy out of the fun?! πŸ€­πŸ‘ @Eva_Maxim @Foxxy702 @dakota_wndrs https://t.co/EzY13bBc7P

    15K1.1K115458K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202613x their median

    πŸ“ ANGELLICA SHOWS HER JOI πŸ“š Starring @Angellicagood & @BadEngelxxx ⏰ Available September 4th https://t.co/ygJ5tVvMnr

    5.7K5559793K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.4x their median

    It's officially @Caillazy season! πŸ’–β˜€οΈ Watch Cailey's DEBUT in FUCKED ON THE FOREST FLOOR with @JackDesfeux today! https://t.co/exY4wyNF1Z https://t.co/igV8rIo2gn

    1.4K1225239K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.1x their median

    So are you hot for teacher or fucking what? πŸ’…πŸŽπŸ“ We're all teachers pet for @Angellicagood... https://t.co/fLtvb1ZPPM

    1.3K989233K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.0x their median

    You better grip onto that picnic blanket while you take every thick inch! πŸŒ³β˜€οΈ Watch @Caillazy in her TransAngels DEBUT with @JackDesfeux HERE: https://t.co/R8RbTiCZSW https://t.co/CEAYLtV3X9

    1.3K1084234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.0x their median

    πŸ’¦ GET A FREE WEEK πŸ’¦ CLICK HERE NOW ➑️ https://t.co/bXlkrV6KSx 😜 If you're not getting in that post-pump stretch, you're not doing it quite like @chaoticbarbieee & @HimexMarie! πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈπŸ’¦ https://t.co/nP70d5qc8Q

    1.3K1156141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.6x their median

    πŸ’¦ GET A FREE WEEK πŸ’¦ CLICK HERE NOW ➑️ https://t.co/bXlkrV6KSx 😜 It's called passion... look it up 😌 @averylust_ @liltitsbigmind https://t.co/ZkLGNLDm70

    1.1K974140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.0x their median

    The gym is kinda empty and the girls are horny as fuck... what could possibly happen next? 😘πŸ’ͺ @chaoticbarbieee @HimexMarie https://t.co/ykTZMrrjGG

    874644133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    The time as cum for your post-pump poundinggg! πŸ§ΌπŸ’¦ @chaoticbarbieee @HimexMarie https://t.co/clQy9hSNnf

    564406027K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Rip off that little skirt and take it to the forest floor... πŸŒ³πŸ‘ @Caillazy @JackDesfeux https://t.co/PGrn9vrrYW

    444211023K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 466 interactions against 351K followers, an engagement rate of 0.134%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

What is TransAngels Official's engagement rate on X?
TransAngels Official (@Transangelsxxx) has an engagement rate of 0.134%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 350,624 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.134%, TransAngels Official sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Transangelsxxx have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Transangelsxxx post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going