David Miller engagement report
@Tracking_Power - 147K followers on X
Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 354 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.241%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 3.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #paxjudaica, #dismantlezionism, #endjewishsupremacism. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #paxjudaica, #dismantlezionism, #endjewishsupremacism.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.241%, David Miller sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 71% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 29% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 600 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 4, 202653x their median
Full statement on my decisive Employment Appeal Tribunal victory against the Zionist movement, solidifying anti-Zionism as a protected philosophical belief under UK equality law. People can no longer be discriminated against for their anti-Zionist beliefs. https://t.co/zWktJOO2bn
- Sep 23, 202332x their median
Canada’s parliament gives a standing ovation to a 98-year-old Ukrainian Nazi collaborator likely to keep a music box at home stuffed with grainy black and white execution photos If John Demjanjuk had lived a little longer he too could have been a hero https://t.co/WXYBYCwuXr
- Oct 17, 20247.9x their median
Apparently Jacob Rees-Mogg was 'furious' and therefore stopped me from talking. Some excerpts from my appearance on his GBNews show. The full video segment is below (along with Michael Crick's responses). Rees-Mogg: Jews are over-represented in positions of power is the classic conspiracy theory against the Jews. Also Rees-Mogg: [The Jews] might be over-represented because they are brilliant. Apparently its not a trope when Mr Rees-Mogg says it. Rees-Mogg: So you’re saying that the Bristol Jewish society is promoting Zionism because they are Jewish and then you’re saying that’s not antisemitic. Me: No, this is absurd: they are promoting Zionism because they are Zionists. Rees-Mogg: It seems to me that he is using anti-Zionism as an absolutely classic shield to try and protect him from an anti-Semitism charge. Michael Crick: I don’t know. It’s a minefileld. I’d like to hear more about what Mr Miller has said and what he has written... ...I think you’ve got to be careful about this whole thing about well that’s what people have said over the centuries and therefore if you say it now, even if it might be true, that you are being anti-Semitic. For instance are you not allowed to say that Jews are over-represented in the City of London or in the law, but you are, perhaps, allowed to say that Asians are over-represented? Enjoy! #DismantleZionism
- Jan 9, 20267.3x their median
After Trump kidnapped Maduro on behalf of Pax Judaica, he turned his attention elsewhere. To Greenland. Trump has announced that they're considering using military force to take over Greenland. But surely his interest in Greenland is only about the interests of US Empire and not that of the transnational empire being developed by the Zionists? Think again. The entire power of the US military is now at the disposal of individual Zionist Oligarchs for whatever pet project they want. In this case the genocidal Jewish supremacist is Ronald Lauder. What is Lauder’s connection to Greenland? Here is Danish social scientist Steven N. Højlund (in the video below with extracts pasted here to). While Trump threatens to seize Greenland by force, a quieter takeover is already underway. And it's happening through the same billionaire who planted the idea in Trump's head Ronald Lauder. The same Lauder who convinced Trump to buy Greenland back in 2017, isn't just talking anymore. He's buying his way in, through a Delaware registered company called Greenland Development Partners. Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in strategic Greenlandic companies. But here's what nobody's reporting. His business partners in Greenland are some of Greenland's most influential people with very, very close ties to Greenland's foreign minister. That's the same person negotiating Greenland's response to Trump's threats. This is economic infiltration disguised as investment and I'm going to show you exactly how it works... This is the story the media isn't telling. Let me introduce you to Greenland Development Partners. It's a Delaware registered investment consortium. And if that sounds deliberately obscure, that's because it is. Delaware corporations are famous for one thing and that's opacity. Delaware is the shell company's capital of America where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny. According to Danish newspaper Politken's investigation, Lauder is a key participant in this consortium. And the consortium has bought stakes in two Greenlandic companies. One of these companies is called Greenland Water Bank: and it's owned by two Greenlandic businessmen, Svend Hardenberg and Jørgen Wæver Johansen. Hardenberg is a former top civil servant and top adviser to the prime minister of Greenland until he got fired recently. He was also the director of Greenland's National Energy Company. In other words, he knows the system inside and out. But Johansen is far more interesting. Johansen is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and he currently chairs the governing Siumut party in Nuuk, Greenland's capital. Siumut is one of the four parties in Greenland's current coalition government. But that's not the real kicker. His wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland. That's the person responsible for handling foreign relations, including relations with the United States. Just take a moment and think about what that means. Ronald Lauder, Trump's friend and adviser on Greenland, is now in business with the husband of Greenland's foreign minister. This isn't just investment. This is influence buying at the very highest level. And I will explain why that is the case. The company Greenland Water Bank, it sounds small and innocent, and it really is. In fact, in 2024, the company's accounts showed minimum staffing costs of only $5,500 and a modest financial loss. In other words, this is a very small company. Greenland Water Bank bottles water from the Lyngmark Spring [near the town of Qeqertarsuaq on Disko Island]…They sell the water locally in the brand name. Until 2024, the company was fully owned by Hardenberg and Wæver Hansen. Then they sold part of their shares to Lauder’s investor group. Now here's what Hardenberg told the Danish newspaper Politiken about why they took Lauder’s investment. The investment is not the most important thing for us, but rather gaining better access to the luxury market where our water should be a natural part. When they tested the water, the conclusion was that our water was the best in the world. It is on the basis of that that they became interested in participating in the development of our company. So you could say Lauder's pitch is very simple. We'll help you sell premium Greenlandic water to the American luxury market. But what did Lauder get in return? Why would one of the world's richest men invest in this tiny company in Greenland? Is it the pure water in bottles that he is interested in or is it something else? The two founders of the company weren't able to attract any other investors since the company started in 2016 until Lauder showed up. Personally, I can only see one thing Lauder gets out of this and that's a conflict of Interest pressure point and a foothold into Greenland's top elite. Direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. Think about it. Sums of invested funds can now flow very easily to Svend and Jørgen through Greenland Water Bank. It could flow directly as large salaries or bonuses or it can be in the form of a business trip, a fancy office, luxury boats or cars. All of course in the name of the company paid by invested money from Lauder. The possibilities for enriching Svend and Jørgen are endless and so is the money that Lauder has at his disposal. $10 million is nothing for Lauder who is good for 5 billion USD. But being in business together can also be a pressure point. An investor can sue you and make your life a living hell, especially if the pockets are very deep and you can buy every lawyer and PR person to spin stories and drag people through the mud. That's the negative pressure angle that this co-operation can also lead to. But the most controversial part is still the connection to the active foreign minister of Greenland, Vivian Motzfeldt. The foreign minister previously served on the board of Greenland Water Bank, but she must have felt that that would have been too obvious a conflict of interest. But the problem is still there. It's the family connection to her husband that makes up the problem in the company that's now partially owned by Trump's friend, who also happens to be the brain behind Trump's acquisition plans. In other words, if Ronald Lauder decides to invest a large sum in Greenland water bank and also pay out a huge bonus to Yan, this money will also enrich Vivian. If it was almost any other investor in the entire world, it wouldn't have been a problem. ____ The Zionists appear to be up to something more ambitious than any previous state or movement in the modern period. If Venezuela and Greenland are both Pax Judaica plays via Singer and Lauder, which Jewish supremacist oligarch is responsible for Canada, the Horn of Africa/Yemen or elsewhere? This is much bigger than just deporting Palestinians, or even resource-grabbing. #DismantleZionism
- Sep 6, 20262.5x their median
Subverting Slovenia New episode of Palestine Declassified In this edition of the show we’ll be exposing how a European government, that imposed an arms embargo on Israel, was destabilized, and ultimately toppled, by a covert dirty tricks campaign. The Slovenian Liberal Freedom govt was targeted by a shadowy private intelligence company known as Black Cube. It was working on behalf of the Zionist entity to influence the outcome of Slovenia’s general election earlier this year. But the Liberal Freedom Movement still secured more votes than their rivals, but insufficient to form a government, so it’s been replaced by a right-wing coalition. With special guest @VanessaBeeley as well as host @DerbyChrisW and resident expert @tracking_power #PaxJudaica @PDeclassified
- Sep 21, 20261.9x their median
Your attention please! Jacob Rees-Mogg channels Peter Porter: This announcement is ending. Our President has already given orders for massive retaliation - it will be decisive. Some of us may die, but remember, statistically it is not likely to be you. All flags are flying fully dressed on Government buildings. The sun is shining. Death is the least we have to fear. We are all in the hands of God, https://t.co/Y7PcOSLEgu
- Sep 16, 20261.6x their median
"Our Missiles were Syrian" Sayyid Hassan remembers the Syrian martyrs responsible for arming Hezb in the 2006 war & arming Gaza Daud Rajha (Chief of Staff 2006-09, Christian) Assef Shawkat (Head of Intelligence 2005-09, Alawi) Hasan Turkmani (Defense Minister 2004-09, Sunni) https://t.co/JYn2RC0MvL
- Sep 22, 2026
‘There is no evidence that this group (Ashab al-Yamin) actually exists nor that it is linked to Iran’, says David Miller. @Tracking_Power https://t.co/H3fXKbTMFP
- Sep 21, 2026
Faced with this generalized aggression against an entire region, a large part of the Western pro-Palestinian movement continues to display an inexplicable difficulty in extending its solidarity beyond the borders of Palestine. Not even the blatant violations of international law and of the ethical principles that it claims to uphold have been enough to prompt a re-examination of its ideological premises. The fact that this aggression was directed against non-belligerent countries was not enough. Nor was the fact that, as is now a consolidated strategy for the Zionist coalition, civilian populations rather than combatants have been targeted; everywhere, and not only in Gaza. The fact that the countries under attack are the same ones that have spent themselves for Palestine, in far more concrete, active, and substantial terms than the West was willing or able to do, also does not seem to raise questions. No organized movement has formed in this part of the world in support of Iran, Yemen, Lebanon or Iraq. Not even the assassination of 168 girls of an elementary school aroused a real public reaction, beyond narrow and marginalized fringes. That this lack of empathy towards the Axis countries, and not by chance primarily toward Iran, stems largely from the biased and partial narrative of the media is certain, but it is not enough to explain the phenomenon when considering the very rich galaxy of movements and associations that make up the pro-Palestinian movement in the West. This movement has over time built a consolidated and efficient counter-information network that not only avoids falling victim to Zionist propaganda, but is constantly engaged in monitoring and debunking media lies. It is capable, that is, of producing its own alternative narrative through which it commits itself with a certain effectiveness to keeping attention alive on the Palestinian question, ceaselessly exposing the daily abuses with which "Israel", even in times of "peace", silently carries out its genocide. So, it is not a matter of inattention. It is not a matter of fatigue of the movement. It is a specific and deliberate choice. Western activism and the Axis of Resistance https://t.co/q0K7KjYLAJ
- Sep 24, 2023
We need to change the way we look at western hypocrisy. Many assume that they want to hide their own crimes. But it's the opposite. They want you to know about their crimes (up to a point). They WANT you to know that they did what you cannot. The hypocrisy IS the point.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 354 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.241%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 3.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #paxjudaica, #dismantlezionism, #endjewishsupremacism. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is David Miller's engagement rate on X?
- David Miller (@Tracking_Power) has an engagement rate of 0.241%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 147,430 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.241%, David Miller sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Tracking_Power have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @Tracking_Power post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.