AIPAC Tracker engagement report
@TrackAIPAC - 521K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #tn01.
Compared with accounts its own size
AIPAC Tracker's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.468%, AIPAC Tracker sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 63% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 25% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 348 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 26, 202629x their median
Of all the videos of the Nepal flooding that I have seen so far, this one might be the worst. These people had no chance. 🙏🙏🙏 https://t.co/XIhUFNESDb
- Oct 21, 202620x their median
Flood the polls, patriots. Vote straight ticket Republican. Keep Texas Texas.
- Jul 22, 202617x their median
🧾 98 House Democrats opposed cutting aid to Israel: https://t.co/GUajtbnsfr
- Oct 20, 20269.3x their median
Donald Trump: "I've been the best president in the history of Israel." https://t.co/4vSkCQRKf5
- Oct 21, 20266.5x their median
I’ve been released from IDF custody with a “warning,” apparently because of my public profile (I told them I wasn’t even a congressmember yet, just a nominee). But several dozen rabbis & participants harvesting olives with me are still in detention. For harvesting olives. They should all be released immediately. To be clear: Palestinians face far worse consequences every day. These detentions by the IDF are one more attempt to undermine Palestinians’ right to harvest their olive groves, travel on their roads, and live in their homes. Yet one more element of escalating, and very clearly state-sponsored ethnic cleansing. We’ll update on their status as soon as we hear.
- Sep 14, 20266.5x their median
🚨 Section 219 is on the brink of passing the Senate. It would permanently merge US & Israeli weapons programs, with no way for a future Congress to undo it. Only 6 Senators are fighting it with 30 days left. Demand yours block it now! Link in replies. https://t.co/Z15KygMf61
- Aug 27, 20265.2x their median
Israeli official speaks to Australia's ABC about the strike he ordered on World Central Kitchen that killed Jacob Flickinger and 6 other aid workers. Says he's not sorry, that WCK has Hamas links and is "not really an organisation you can say is innocent." https://t.co/aqzxmMAd7B
- Sep 3, 20264.9x their median
33 House Democrats voted with the GOP (minus Reps. Massie & Davidson) to pass H.R. 4795 to cut federal funding to colleges and universities that boycott Israel. AIPAC and the Israel lobby have spent >$83 MILLION supporting these Democrats: Jimmy Panetta #CA19 Jim Costa #CA21 Gil Cisneros #CA31 Brad Sherman #CA32 Juan Vargas #CA52 Joe Courtney #CT02 Darren Soto #FL09 Kathy Castor #FL14 Lois Frankel #FL22 Jared Moskowitz #FL23 Debbie Wasserman Schultz #FL25 Brad Schneider #IL10 Jake Auchincloss #MA04 Jared Golden #ME02 Hillary Scholten #MI03 Haley Stevens #MI11 Shri Thanedar #MI13 Don Davis #NC01 Donald Norcross #NJ01 Dina Titus #NV01 Susie Lee #NV03 Tom Suozzi #NY03 Laura Gillen #NY04 Ritchie Torres #NY15 George Latimer #NY16 Josh Riley #NY19 John Mannion #NY22 Greg Landsman #OH01 Henry Cuellar #TX28 Vicente Gonzalez #TX34 Eugene Vindman #VA07 Marie Gluesenkamp Perez #WA03 Kim Schrier #WA08
- Oct 20, 20264.1x their median
Israel — not the Israel lobby, AIPAC, but the state of Israel — is running TV ads in Iowa: @andrewperezdc @zeteo_news https://t.co/lsTfR0O5mA
- Sep 20, 20264.0x their median
You’ve probably seen Ed Sheeran’s (teleprompter-read, PR team-written) apology by now— here the part where he cried and apologized for the apology at the end of the concert👇🏽 https://t.co/hAPj9qzQq2
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.
- What is AIPAC Tracker's engagement rate on X?
- AIPAC Tracker (@TrackAIPAC) has an engagement rate of 0.468%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 521,394 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.468%, AIPAC Tracker sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @TrackAIPAC have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @TrackAIPAC post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.