Back to @TrackAIPAC's profile

AIPAC Tracker engagement report

@TrackAIPAC - 521K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.468%
of 521K followers
Per impression
1.48%
165K views on a typical post
Reach
31.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.072%
118 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.6/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #tn01.

Compared with accounts its own size

AIPAC Tracker's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.468%, AIPAC Tracker sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 348 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202629x their median

    Of all the videos of the Nepal flooding that I have seen so far, this one might be the worst. These people had no chance. 🙏🙏🙏 https://t.co/XIhUFNESDb

    63K6.7K1.1K8426.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202620x their median

    Flood the polls, patriots. Vote straight ticket Republican. Keep Texas Texas.

    42K6.7K1.2K126261K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202617x their median

    🧾 98 House Democrats opposed cutting aid to Israel: https://t.co/GUajtbnsfr

    17K4.6K469322690K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20269.3x their median

    Donald Trump: "I've been the best president in the history of Israel." https://t.co/4vSkCQRKf5

    20K2.3K3174721.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20266.5x their median

    I’ve been released from IDF custody with a “warning,” apparently because of my public profile (I told them I wasn’t even a congressmember yet, just a nominee). But several dozen rabbis & participants harvesting olives with me are still in detention. For harvesting olives. They should all be released immediately. To be clear: Palestinians face far worse consequences every day. These detentions by the IDF are one more attempt to undermine Palestinians’ right to harvest their olive groves, travel on their roads, and live in their homes. Yet one more element of escalating, and very clearly state-sponsored ethnic cleansing. We’ll update on their status as soon as we hear.

    11K2.6K1.5K224452K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.5x their median

    🚨 Section 219 is on the brink of passing the Senate. It would permanently merge US & Israeli weapons programs, with no way for a future Congress to undo it. Only 6 Senators are fighting it with 30 days left. Demand yours block it now! Link in replies. https://t.co/Z15KygMf61

    10K4.9K331260196K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.2x their median

    Israeli official speaks to Australia's ABC about the strike he ordered on World Central Kitchen that killed Jacob Flickinger and 6 other aid workers. Says he's not sorry, that WCK has Hamas links and is "not really an organisation you can say is innocent." https://t.co/aqzxmMAd7B

    7.8K3.5K6177161.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.9x their median

    33 House Democrats voted with the GOP (minus Reps. Massie & Davidson) to pass H.R. 4795 to cut federal funding to colleges and universities that boycott Israel. AIPAC and the Israel lobby have spent >$83 MILLION supporting these Democrats: Jimmy Panetta #CA19 Jim Costa #CA21 Gil Cisneros #CA31 Brad Sherman #CA32 Juan Vargas #CA52 Joe Courtney #CT02 Darren Soto #FL09 Kathy Castor #FL14 Lois Frankel #FL22 Jared Moskowitz #FL23 Debbie Wasserman Schultz #FL25 Brad Schneider #IL10 Jake Auchincloss #MA04 Jared Golden #ME02 Hillary Scholten #MI03 Haley Stevens #MI11 Shri Thanedar #MI13 Don Davis #NC01 Donald Norcross #NJ01 Dina Titus #NV01 Susie Lee #NV03 Tom Suozzi #NY03 Laura Gillen #NY04 Ritchie Torres #NY15 George Latimer #NY16 Josh Riley #NY19 John Mannion #NY22 Greg Landsman #OH01 Henry Cuellar #TX28 Vicente Gonzalez #TX34 Eugene Vindman #VA07 Marie Gluesenkamp Perez #WA03 Kim Schrier #WA08

    7.5K3.7K434349268K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20264.1x their median

    Israel — not the Israel lobby, AIPAC, but the state of Israel — is running TV ads in Iowa: @andrewperezdc @zeteo_news https://t.co/lsTfR0O5mA

    7.3K2.4K117161290K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.0x their median

    You’ve probably seen Ed Sheeran’s (teleprompter-read, PR team-written) apology by now— here the part where he cried and apologized for the apology at the end of the concert👇🏽 https://t.co/hAPj9qzQq2

    6.8K7701.0K9959.5M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#tn01

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

What is AIPAC Tracker's engagement rate on X?
AIPAC Tracker (@TrackAIPAC) has an engagement rate of 0.468%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 521,394 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.468%, AIPAC Tracker sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TrackAIPAC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TrackAIPAC post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going