Back to @TourreBakahai's profile

Tourré Bakahai engagement report

@TourreBakahai - 46K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
5.70%
of 46K followers
Per impression
8.65%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
65.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 5.70%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 8.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 65.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 35% are part of a thread and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tourré Bakahai's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 5.70%, Tourré Bakahai sits above the 90th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.61% to 82.9%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video29% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link35% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 29% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 35% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 203 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 21, 20265.4x their median

    A teary Prince Harry tells the High Court that his life has been “commercialised” by the media, and that it's made Meghan Markle’s life “an absolute misery”…Advice to them both: stop selling your private lives to the media, you pea-brained hypocrites.

    13K84346344183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.6x their median

    Markle & Prince Harry are now literally using kids to try and fabricate a scare aimed at getting UK taxpayers to fund VIP security. This is yet another "New York car chase"-style lie. They are a despicable pair. https://t.co/iFxvyZIShP

    8.3K7502913357K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.5x their median

    Dumb Prince Harry went out in London last night perma-grinning like a z-list wannabe showbiz starlet while wearing a medal awarded for "distinguished service to the Monarch and the Royal Family" like it was his favourite bling. Talk about taking the piss. What an odious creep.

    6.1K347851381K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.9x their median

    Did the conniving Markle and dumb Prince Harry "warn" members of the Royal Family that they were going to drag their names through the mud on international TV and in a tabloid book? No, they just went ahead and did it, for huge amounts of easy cash. https://t.co/Umf7Ox79nv

    4.5K35664551K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.9x their median

    The basic Meghan Markle posting a little swan on her failed jam company's social media account is a testament to how unoriginal and cheesy she is. We all know she supports chubby Charlie Spencer's hate book because he's as much of a lying rat as her and the ginger dipstick.

    4.6K24682239K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.6x their median

    Note to unemployed Meghan Markle and dumb Prince Harry: it's not the job of armed British police to engage with your paparazzi fantasies. That's not what they're there for, especially as you both live for tacky publicity snaps, including the ones you set up in British schools.

    3.9K32552832K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    The notoriously nasty Meghan Markle & Prince Harry are clearly trying to worm their way back into the Royal Family by pretending they've changed, yet continue to treat Thomas Markle, an 82-year-old amputee, with immense cruelty. This says everything about the gruesome twosome.

    3.4K22456325K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 2026

    To repeat: Meghan Markle has spent years playing the big moral preacher, attacking the Royal Family, Britain, the media etc, often with appalling lies, while secretly allowing an alleged child abuser in her own family to carry on as normal. She knew, and she did nothing. Why?

    3.2K22494630K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026

    Snivelling Prince Harry claims “everybody can relate” to him & Markle dragging family. Utter garbage. There’s not a single decent person in the world who would allow themselves to be filmed slagging off their parents, siblings, etc, while trying to portray them all as racists.

    3.2K24050225K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026

    What a pathetic, trailer park stunt by the ridiculous grifter Meghan Markle. Her failing "business" doesn't make enough money to give anything away, yet there she is trying to turn things around using charity. Grotesque behaviour. https://t.co/OE8JxqT3ro

    3.0K209107752K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 5.70%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 8.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 65.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 35% are part of a thread and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

What is Tourré Bakahai's engagement rate on X?
Tourré Bakahai (@TourreBakahai) has an engagement rate of 5.70%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 45,991 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 5.70%, Tourré Bakahai sits above the 90th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TourreBakahai have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TourreBakahai post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going