Back to @ToryFibs's profile

Tory Fibs engagement report

@ToryFibs - 178K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.096%
of 178K followers
Per impression
2.40%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
4.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
172
interactions (median)
Saved
0.07%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tag: #proud.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tory Fibs's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.096%, Tory Fibs sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video32% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202613x their median

    She thought she had him bang to rights. Then this happened……. https://t.co/leEjlI7wzR

    1.9K276429180K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202612x their median

    Jeremy Corbyn built the Labour Party to nearly 600,000 members. Guess how much 600,000 members paying a £5 monthly membership equates to? Answer: £36 million a year. You don’t need crypto bros when you have party powered by ordinary people like you and me.

    1.7K37981757K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20269.0x their median

    Amber Valley Election Result: 🟩 Green 30% (+4%) 🟪 Reform 27% (+27%) 🟦 Tory 17% (-15%) 🟥 Labour 16% (-6%) Green Gain 🪧

    1.3K23851122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.6x their median

    The triple lock. It should go. Immediately. Its job is done (pensioner poverty is low) and the state pension is slowly being replaced by your auto-enrolment income anyway....

    9866623322154K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20266.0x their median

    The UK now predicted to have the smallest national deficit in the G7. Hope is back. https://t.co/ZfZuKrpZ3o

    86661981340K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20265.2x their median

    Your reminder that just last month in Belfast at Fleadh Cheoil na hÉireann, Catholics and Nationalists applauded Orange bands from East Belfast joining in the festival. It was an act of unity and love that appalled the Orange Men in Portadown now trampling on Garvaghy residents.

    7589826424K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20264.7x their median

    Number of Protestants signing public letter in support of the residents of the Garvaghy Road • 140 (8pm Thursday) • 400 (12am Thursday) • 480 (8am Friday) • 1,000 (8pm Friday) It. Will. Go. Higher.

    65710535319K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20264.6x their median

    🎶 oh, oh, oh, there’s no going back down Garvaghy 🎶 Christy Moore delivers. https://t.co/emFgt6FSZV

    65312411731K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20264.5x their median

    Knee Cap arrive on the Garvaghy Road. https://t.co/ojyXoRImz6

    6629517222K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20264.3x their median

    Number of Protestants signing public letter in support of the residents of the Garvaghy Road • 140 (8pm Thursday) • 400 (12am Thursday) • 480 (8am Friday) It. Will. Go. Higher.

    57911939215K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#proud

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Tory Fibs's engagement rate on X?
Tory Fibs (@ToryFibs) has an engagement rate of 0.096%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 178,108 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.096%, Tory Fibs sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ToryFibs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ToryFibs post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going