Back to @TorusChain's profile

TorusChain engagement report

@TorusChain - 196K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 196K followers
Per impression
6.63%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
84
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 6.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.647% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 205 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TorusChain's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, TorusChain sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 61 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 25, 20262.4x their median

    Your Ethereum app just found its cape. Torus makes it fly. https://t.co/uUegHbJZBg

    16539103.1K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 20262.1x their median

    Somewhere between ‘GM ser’ and ‘massive exposure’, I lost the plot. https://t.co/MWwuhUOwoR

    1713003.0K viewsView on X
  • May 1, 20261.9x their median

    It was always there; you just didn't notice. https://t.co/zHUJCe4UoA

    1553003.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20261.6x their median

    The seat is set, and space is secured. https://t.co/hHiDXoEQkB

    10035001.3K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 20261.6x their median

    Torus Chain life when you’re deep in it and nobody outside even knows what’s building yet. https://t.co/FSKcKFPpb6

    1283003.3K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 2026

    When you’ve run the numbers a million times And somehow the gas fees are still higher than your portfolio. https://t.co/xYPE4AYuXs

    1223002.1K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 2026

    Web3 got its own language fr. https://t.co/d3ruA09HI3

    10417003.4K viewsView on X
  • May 4, 2026

    Security is what we own! https://t.co/cGDUSI0wBN

    1104103.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026

    Your next prediction could earn you 15,000 EPs. Make your call. Back your conviction. https://t.co/KQBVkJVY91

    9023003.9K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 2026

    Go outside and clear your mind. Me outside: If I buy now and it pumps while I'm touching grass, that's on me. https://t.co/CSD3Ou1tsG

    8315003.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 6.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.647% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 205 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

What is TorusChain's engagement rate on X?
TorusChain (@TorusChain) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 195,905 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, TorusChain sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TorusChain have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TorusChain post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going