Back to @TopStockAlerts1's profile

Top Stock Alerts engagement report

@TopStockAlerts1 - 126K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 126K followers
Per impression
0.069%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 126K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.069% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78 interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Top Stock Alerts's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Top Stock Alerts sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,969 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,068 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 418 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 202678x their median

    $GME the chart looks very constructive right here

    734012.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20266.0x their median

    $IREN this is holding way too well to ignore

    51001.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20265.0x their median

    $OUST nothing flashy but solid move building here

    40101.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20264.0x their median

    $IBRX hard not to like the way this is shaping up

    31001.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.0x their median

    After Hours Top Gainers PT2 $MKZR $CALC $MI $LUD $JSPR

    12001.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.0x their median

    After Hours Top Gainers $RETO $VEEA $NAUT $SCKT $XCH.X

    30001.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.0x their median

    $SCKT this might actually have more in it than I thought

    21001.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.0x their median

    Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison is preparing a major leadership overhaul at Warner Bros. Pictures ahead of the expected closing next week of the $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, Bloomberg reported. Paramount Pictures executives Dana Goldberg and Josh Greenstein are expected to oversee Warner Bros. Pictures after the deal, consolidating management under the combined company, which is expected to be named Skydance Corp. Current Warner Bros. Pictures chiefs Michael De Luca and Pamela Abdy are not expected to join the merged company. Ellison is also maintaining a strong focus on DC Studios, meeting with co-heads James Gunn and Peter Safran, whose 10-year franchise strategy has received his backing. The executives are expected to remain under contracts running through April 2027. The restructuring comes as Ellison targets about 30 theatrical releases annually, with DC positioned as a key growth franchise. $PSKY $WBD

    30001.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.0x their median

    Federal prosecutors arrested Greg Lui, owner of California-based Earthmade Computer, accusing him of illegally exporting more than $300 million worth of computer servers containing restricted Nvidia AI chips to China between 2023 and 2024. Prosecutors allege Lui and unidentified co-conspirators used third countries, including Malaysia and Singapore, and falsified documentation to conceal China as the equipment’s final destination. According to the indictment, Lui knowingly arranged sales involving chips subject to U.S. export restrictions. In one transaction, he allegedly acquired 27 servers equipped with Nvidia H100 GPUs for about $7.6 million from an unidentified U.S. manufacturer. Lui faces charges of conspiracy to violate export controls, smuggling and conspiracy to commit money laundering. He pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors are seeking to keep him detained, citing what they described as a significant flight risk. $NVDA $SMCI

    11001.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.0x their median

    $CYCU starting to trend now… finally

    11001.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 126K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.069% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78 interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

What is Top Stock Alerts's engagement rate on X?
Top Stock Alerts (@TopStockAlerts1) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 126,361 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Top Stock Alerts sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TopStockAlerts1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TopStockAlerts1 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going