Back to @TivadarDanka's profile

Tivadar Danka engagement report

@TivadarDanka - 94K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.208%
of 94K followers
Per impression
2.43%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
8.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
196
interactions (median)
Saved
0.515%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 14% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 106x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tivadar Danka's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.208%, Tivadar Danka sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 20, 2026106x their median

    Hungarian PM Péter Magyar: “Ukraine is the victim and has every right to defend its territorial sovereignty and integrity with every means available to it” What a refreshing change from Viktor Orbán. https://t.co/qi6dQfZ9wx

    17K3.2K22832165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202618x their median

    Mathematics is taught wrong. Its usefulness is hidden behind convoluted formulas, technical nuances, and abstract nonsense. Throughout the years, math enhanced my professional and personal life in ways I can’t even begin to describe. My mission is to take you to the same place.

    3.2K202635107K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202610x their median

    Calculus is a total waste of time. Learning it was the single best decision of my machine learning career.

    1.9K64268122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20256.9x their median

    I wrote a 4000-words long article about all the math you need to know for machine learning. Trust me, you want to bookmark this: https://t.co/sV52SBB16J

    1.1K16926587K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20266.7x their median

    In mathematics, you will be rewarded more for your tolerance to temporary confusion than you will be for your intelligence.

    1.2K11427930K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.2x their median

    Modern education ruined linear algebra because the beauty of geometric transformations got buried under endless matrix multiplication drills.

    1.1K8529632K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.7x their median

    LLMs are statistical bullshit generators. They are trained to say what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear. Yeah, I know, there’s reasoning, tool calling, memory, and other neat tricks. Still, fundamentally, generative models are stochastic parrots.

    679553543854K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.5x their median

    Studying pure mathematics is completely impractical. It was the best thing I ever did.

    8174812227K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.3x their median

    In applied math, you will be rewarded more for your ability to build geometric intuition than you will be for computing complex integrals by hand.

    7626116424K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.7x their median

    Memorization is a temporary hack for a broken learning system. If you cannot derive a concept, you do not know it.

    59469561226K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 14% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 106x its own typical post.

What is Tivadar Danka's engagement rate on X?
Tivadar Danka (@TivadarDanka) has an engagement rate of 0.208%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 94,366 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.208%, Tivadar Danka sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TivadarDanka have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TivadarDanka post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going