Emanuel “Tito” Villa engagement report
@TitoVilla1982 - 273K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 956 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.35%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 10.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tudnusa, #ligabbvamx, #megafutbol.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #tudnusa, #ligabbvamx, #megafutbol.
Compared with accounts its own size
Emanuel “Tito” Villa's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.35%, Emanuel “Tito” Villa sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 8% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 137 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 25, 20266.6x their median
Listos para el Campeón de Campeones! 🏆🚂🫡 https://t.co/nZQk9eUMvd
- Jul 7, 20263.9x their median
Siento que se ha instalado una grieta difícil de sanar entre la sensibilidad argentina y la mexicana. Hay una animosidad que, más allá de cómo haya surgido, parece haberse vuelto estructural, como si fuera una rivalidad destinada a alimentarse sola. Es agotador intentar racionalizar algo que se mueve desde la pasión y el impulso, especialmente cuando las redes sociales convierten lo que debería ser el "folclore" del fútbol en un campo de batalla. 😓
- Sep 13, 20262.6x their median
Simplemente gracias @CruzAzul por este primer tiempo! Qué manera de disfrutar del baile que le están pegando a los rivales! 💙🙌👊🚂
- Sep 13, 20262.3x their median
Increíble que haya que terminar sufriendo así después del juegazo que había dado el equipo! 😰 Ni modo, a seguir corrigiendo, mejorando y sobre todo a seguir disfrutando de esta victoria. 💙🚂
- Aug 28, 20262.0x their median
AMAURY GARCÍA Y ROGER GONZÁLEZ TITULARES. Merecido para ambos.
- Sep 13, 20262.0x their median
CRUZ AZUL SALE ASÍ: Mier; Márquez, Ditta, Amaury, Chiquete, Campos; Lira, Charly, Palavecino, Paradela e Ibañez. Regresa Márquez por derecha.
- Aug 10, 20261.7x their median
Hace rato que Paradela anda en buen nivel! Además acompaña ese gran momento con goles! Enhorabuena para José, porque tuvo muchos momentos de crítica en torneos anteriores! 👏
- Jul 18, 20261.6x their median
Se veía venir… lo máquina lo termina dando vuelta con otro gran gol de Jeremy Márquez! Grandes movimientos de Joel Huiqui desde el banco para provocar esta voltereta! 👏👏👏
- Jul 22, 20261.5x their median
Otra gran victoria de la máquina viniendo de atrás y apelando a ese ADN y a ese gran fondo de plantel para darle la vuelta de nueva cuenta a un marcador! 👏👏👏 Cruz Azul llegará más que listo para disputar su primer título del semestre frente al Toluca el próximo sábado en el Campeón de Campeones! 🏆👊
- Aug 2, 2026
Se termina una racha de 14 partidos sin perder, pero en donde se levantaron dos títulos de por medio! 🏆🏆 Y a pesar de que incluso hoy se pudo haberlo empatado, me quedo con que se luchó hasta el final! 👊 A cambiar el chip y a encarar con todo la @LeaguesCup! ⚽️🙏🚂💙
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 956 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.35%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 10.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tudnusa, #ligabbvamx, #megafutbol.
- What is Emanuel “Tito” Villa's engagement rate on X?
- Emanuel “Tito” Villa (@TitoVilla1982) has an engagement rate of 0.35%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,907 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.35%, Emanuel “Tito” Villa sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @TitoVilla1982 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @TitoVilla1982 post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.