Kim H Wong engagement report
@Time_and_Trade - 158K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 48x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #clarityact, #crypto.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #bitcoin, #clarityact, #crypto.
Compared with accounts its own size
Kim H Wong's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.078%, Kim H Wong sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 78% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 56% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 1609 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202648x their median
📢 StarX Network – Official Staking & P2P Update We are pleased to announce that Staking is scheduled to launch on StarX Network on September 17, 2026. 🔒 This marks another important step in the development of the StarX ecosystem, providing the community with an additional way to participate in the network through their STRX holdings. 🔒 Staking – Launching September 17 The Staking feature is currently in the final stages of preparation and is scheduled to go live on September 17, 2026. Further information regarding available staking options, rewards, eligibility, and participation requirements will be announced closer to the launch date. We encourage the community to follow our official channels for the latest updates and detailed information. 🤝 P2P – Currently Under Discussion We are also currently exploring the development of a P2P feature for the StarX ecosystem. At this stage, P2P has not been officially confirmed for release. The feature remains under discussion and evaluation, including considerations related to technical implementation, security, and overall ecosystem requirements. As development progresses, the scope and functionality may be modified, the timeline may change, or the feature may ultimately not be released. An official announcement will only be made once the feature has been thoroughly reviewed and a confirmed release decision has been made. 🚀 Looking Ahead Staking is one of several developments currently being worked on as we continue expanding and improving the StarX ecosystem. We have additional updates and developments planned, and we look forward to sharing more information with the community in the coming weeks. Thank you for your continued trust, patience, and support as we continue building StarX Network. Stay tuned for further announcements. September 17, 2026 — Staking Launch 🔒 🔗 Official Resources 📲 Google Play Store: https://t.co/jBp1414gaz 📄 Whitepaper: https://t.co/c5msTkWHyh — StarX Network Team 🚀
- Aug 20, 202633x their median
Introducing Scale Network - The Operating System for the AI World Scale Network, based in Switzerland and the United States, is building a full-stack enterprise AI and data platform that transforms fragmented organizational data into secure, actionable intelligence connecting the complete journey from Data → Intelligence → Action. Our mission is to build the intelligence infrastructure for the next generation of organizations across finance, healthcare, defense, manufacturing, energy, aviation, supply chains, and the public sector. 🏆 LEADERSHIP & ACHIEVEMENTS - Led by CEO Chris Parker, a Harvard graduate with 15 years of experience at Google and OpenAI, including work related to ChatGPT. - COO Alex Morgan brings extensive experience from Netflix, Airbnb, and NVIDIA. - Part of the NVIDIA Inception Program and collaborating with OpenAI to develop advanced enterprise AI infrastructure. - Delivered solutions for major organizations, including Singapore Changi Airport, Shanghai Airport, and Public Health England. - Founded from an AI research lab in Palo Alto, initially focused on optimizing how large and complex datasets are processed, connected, and understood. ⚡️ CORE PRODUCTS ✅ Scale Fabric: Connects and unifies data across databases, applications, APIs, and real-time streams. ✅ Scale Cortex: Deploys private AI models, LLMs, autonomous agents, and intelligent workflows securely. ✅ Scale Sentinel: Analyzes real-time operational data to identify risks, patterns, and critical insights. ✅ Scale Nexus: Creates shared intelligence across data, AI systems, entities, and organizational operations. ✅ Scale Relay: Deploys and manages AI infrastructure across cloud, on-premise, air-gapped, and edge environments. 🌐 Experience now at: https://t.co/AX8iLDg3Y0 Together, we Scale. Together, we change the world. #ScaleAI #SCALE #ScaleNetwork #WebApp
- Sep 18, 202629x their median
📢 StarX Network – Community Q&A Answers 🚀 Thank you to everyone who submitted questions. Here are answers to some of the most frequently asked questions: ❓ How many STRX tokens have been mined so far? ⛏️ Around 48M STRX have been mined so far. Currently, around 30K users are active. We have also started the STRX slashing mechanism for inactive accounts. Slashed STRX will return to the mining pool and can be distributed through the mining system. ❓ Will STRX have a 1:1 distribution? If the total mined STRX does not exceed the available mining allocation before TGE, the current plan is to maintain a 1:1 distribution. Further details will be provided closer to TGE. ❓ Has StarX Network undergone an audit? The project has not yet completed a formal audit. We plan to undergo an audit with a professional third-party audit firm once we get closer to the listing phase. The audit firm will be announced once the audit process is confirmed. ❓ When will TGE happen? 📅 We are currently targeting December 2026 for TGE. However, the exact timing will depend on market conditions and whether the project is ready for the TGE and listing process. We will provide the confirmed date through an official announcement. ❓ What happened to the CoinMarketCap listing? Our first CoinMarketCap submission was rejected. We plan to submit StarX Network again once the required information and conditions are ready. We also plan to pursue a CoinGecko listing. ❓ When will the StarX Network team be revealed? 👥 We currently plan to reveal the team after the listing. More information regarding the team will be shared at the appropriate stage. ❓ Why was the StarX Network staking launch moved from September 17? 🔒 The staking launch was originally planned for September 17. However, due to additional security checks and related technical issues, we decided to take additional time to ensure the feature is properly prepared before releasing it to the community. The new planned release date for staking is September 28, 2026. We believe it is better to take additional time for security and testing rather than rush the launch. ❓ Where will staking rewards come from? 🔒 STRX used for staking rewards will come from the Community Pool. ❓ Which exchanges will StarX Network list on? We are currently in discussions with multiple exchanges. Specific exchange names will only be announced once agreements are finalized. ❓ Could you please provide information about the utility of the StarX coin? 🪙 We are currently working on expanding the utility and use cases of STRX within the StarX ecosystem. We are also working on something related to STRX utility that we plan to announce very soon. We don't want to reveal the details before everything is finalized, but more information will be shared through an official announcement once it is ready. We appreciate everyone who continues to ask questions and provide feedback. Transparency and clear communication with our community remain important as we move toward TGE and listing. More updates will be shared through our official channels. 🚀 — StarX Network Team
- Sep 12, 20265.1x their median
$PI 已连续数周跻身 CoinMarketCap 看涨情绪榜前五名。价格走势图显示其即将迎来突破。9 月 15 日的重头戏是 Pi Network 计划进行的主网升级（至 Protocol 27 协议版本），对这一事件的预期可能会推动价格突破。 $PI has been on the https://t.co/VzHtFYFWaD bullish sentiment top 5 list for weeks already. Price chart looks ready to breakout. The main event to expect on September 15 is Pi Network's targeted Mainnet upgrade to Protocol 27. Anticiaption of this event may drive the breakout.
- Sep 12, 2026
$MONAD vs $SUPRA 👀👀 One has the hype. The other has the technology to make you question the valuation. Look at $Supra next to $Monad and ask yourself a brutally simple question❓ Does the valuation gap actually reflect the technology gap? $Monad has done something impressive,a high-performance, EVM-native L1 capable of around 10K TPS. But $Supra is playing a much bigger game. 500K TPS benchmarked across 300 nodes ✅ Sub-second finality✅ MoveVM + EVM + SolanaVM coming✅ Native oracles✅ Native automation✅ Native randomness✅ Cross-chain infrastructure✅ A vertically integrated stack instead of outsourcing critical primitives✅ And this is the part people keep missing: @SUPRA_Labs isn't simply trying to build a faster EVM. It's trying to build an entire financial/computational stack inside the L1. That is a fundamentally different thesis. Monad's strength is making the EVM extremely fast. Supra's thesis is: Why stop at a fast execution layer when the entire infrastructure surrounding execution can be native too? Oracles. Automation. Randomness. Interoperability. Multiple VMs. DeFi infrastructure. All sitting under one roof. And Supra's EVM isn't even the end of the story. Its architecture is designed around vertical integration, meaning applications can use native infrastructure without stitching together a collection of external providers. Supra's own docs describe native automation running directly at the validator layer, without off-chain bots or centralized relayers. Now look at the market. If a network with this architecture is valued at only a tiny fraction of a comparable high performance L1... that's not merely “cheap.” That's a market potentially failing to price the optionality. Of course, technology alone doesn't guarantee a token success. $Supra still has to turn infrastructure into users, liquidity, developers and sustained economic activity. But that is precisely why I find the asymmetry so interesting😊 The market is looking at $SUPRA and saying: "Prove it." Well, look closer👀 Network activity is already beginning to move. For the first time in over 10 months, $Supra processed more than 1.6M transactions in 24 hours🔥 While you look at the charts, I'm looking at the technology. So here is the question: What happens when $SUPRA starts getting the hype and attention $MONAD is enjoying today? Because if $Supra captures even a fraction of the market currently assigned to much larger L1s, today's valuation starts looking almost absurd. $Monad proved there is demand for fast EVM infrastructure. $Supra is trying to prove you can build something much bigger than that. And at these valuations? I'm not sure the market has caught up yet. $SUPRA isn't my conviction because it's cheap. It's cheap because I believe the market hasn't understood what is being built. A true world computer 🖥️ #Supra #Monad
- Sep 19, 2026
There has been meaningful progress recently with Parallax Network ( $PAX ), especially around Proof of Humanity, Trust Score, the mobile app, mining scarcity, and preparation for its future lockchain/testnet. 1. A recent tracker showed roughly 293.8M $PAX mined and 399,652 users, putting Parallax very close to both 300M $PAX and 400K users. 2. Proof of Humanity is becoming more tangible One of the biggest developments is the Fuzzy Biometric Hash rollout. The App Store release notes confirm that the system scans a user's face and converts it locally on the device into an irreversible mathematical hash. Parallax says the original photo/video is not stored or transmitted. The feature is currently optional and being rolled out gradually. This matters because Parallax's long-term architecture is supposed to use the biometric hash as the basis for Proof of Humanity—one human, one account. 2. Parallax has added the $PAX Arcade The Arcade is now live in the mobile application. It currently includes PAX's Slice and PAX Merge, along with a weekly leaderboard. An important distinction: the games don't simply hand out additional $PAX. High leaderboard positions provide temporary mining-rate boosts. This is intended to give people without huge referral networks another way of increasing their mining rate. This is a better design than turning the app into a simple game-reward faucet, because $PAX issuance remains centered around the mining mechanism. 3. Version 1.8.3 expands the Trust system It adds connections for Telegram and X, eight additional badges, social/minigame rewards and a redesigned profile. These features may look cosmetic, but they're connected to Parallax's broader attempt to distinguish real, organically participating people from bots/farms. The project's recent messaging emphasizes that Trust Score isn't supposed to reward robotic-perfect behavior; it is intended to build from organic activity, reliability and network participation. 4. $PAX scarcity is starting to become visible Parallax doesn't use a conventional Bitcoin-style four-year halving. Its model reduces the base mining rate by 10% after each 100M-PAX emission milestone: 1.00 PAX/hour → 0.90 → 0.81 → 0.729 → 0.6561 → ... The project reports that after crossing the 200M PAX milestone, the base rate became 0.81 PAX/hour. A recent community tracker put mined $PAX at approximately 293.76M, meaning the next 300M milestone was close. At 300M, the expected base rate would fall another 10% to 0.729 PAX/hour. That's significant for someone already mining PAX: the design deliberately gives earlier participation a higher base emission rate. 5. The blockchain side is becoming clearer. Parallax's public GitHub now explicitly describes the future chain as using the Move language and a Move-based VM, derived from the Open Libra/0L framework, which itself comes from the Diem lineage. The project appropriately discloses that inheritance rather than presenting all underlying blockchain code as built from scratch. Join Parallax Network and start mining $PAX free. It is still very early! App download link: Android (Google Play Store): https://t.co/XLtS5PuWjQ iOS (App Store): https://t.co/Saa0DqH91q Invite code: AE68C35F @networkparallax #Parallaxnetwork #Layer1 #Blockchain #ProofOfTrust #TowerConsensus #Cryptocurrencies #Crypto #CryptoPayments #Web3 #dApp #SocialMining #DeFi #Gaming
- Sep 19, 2026
Parallax Network ($PAX) 近期取得了显著进展，特别是在“人性证明”（Proof of Humanity）、信任评分（Trust Score）、移动应用、挖矿稀缺性以及未来主网/测试网的筹备工作等方面。 1. 最新数据显示，已挖出的 $PAX 约为 2.938 亿枚，用户数达 399,652 人；这意味着 Parallax 即将达到 3 亿枚 $PAX 和 40 万用户的里程碑。 2. “人性证明”机制正变得更加具体可行 其中一项重大进展是推出了“模糊生物识别哈希”（Fuzzy Biometric Hash）功能。App Store 的版本更新说明确认，该系统会扫描用户面部，并在设备本地将其转换为不可逆的数学哈希值。Parallax 表示，原始照片或视频既不会被存储，也不会被传输。该功能目前为可选配置，并正在逐步推广。这一点至关重要，因为 Parallax 的长期架构计划将生物识别哈希作为“人性证明”的基础，以实现“一人一账户”的目标。 2. Parallax 推出了 $PAX Arcade（游戏中心） 该游戏中心现已在移动应用中上线，目前包含 PAX Slice 和 PAX Merge 两款游戏，并设有每周排行榜。 一个重要的区别在于：这些游戏并不会直接发放额外的 $PAX。排行榜上的高排名能带来暂时的挖矿速率提升。此举旨在为那些没有庞大推荐网络的用户提供另一种提高挖矿速率的途径。相比将应用变成单纯的游戏奖励分发器，这种设计更为合理，因为 $PAX 的发行核心依然基于挖矿机制。 3. 1.8.3 版本扩展了信任系统 新版本增加了对 Telegram 和 X（原 Twitter）的关联功能，新增了八种徽章，引入了社交与小游戏奖励，并重新设计了个人资料页面。 这些功能看似只是表面上的改动，实则与 Parallax 更宏大的目标息息相关：即区分真实的自然参与用户与机器人或“刷号”群体。项目方近期的宣传强调，信任评分并非旨在奖励那种“机器人般完美”的行为，而是建立在自然活跃度、可靠性以及网络参与度之上的。 4. $PAX 的稀缺性开始显现 Parallax 并不采用比特币那种传统的四年减半机制。其模型规定，每当 PAX 发行量达到 1 亿（100M）这一里程碑时，基础挖矿速率便会降低 10%： 1.00 PAX/小时 → 0.90 → 0.81 → 0.729 → 0.6561 → ... 据项目方通报，在突破 2 亿 PAX 发行量大关后，基础速率已调整为 0.81 PAX/小时。近期社区数据显示，已挖出的 $PAX 总量约为 2.9376 亿，这意味着即将触及 3 亿这一里程碑。一旦达到 3 亿，预计基础速率将再次下调 10%，降至 0.729 PAX/小时。这对现有的 PAX 矿工而言意义重大：该机制有意让早期参与者享有更高的基础发行速率。 5. 区块链层面的规划日益清晰。 Parallax 的公开 GitHub 页面现已明确指出，其未来的区块链将采用 Move 语言及基于 Move 的虚拟机（VM）。该架构源自 Open Libra/0L 框架，而后者则承袭自 Diem 体系。项目方如实披露了这种技术继承关系，而非声称所有底层区块链代码均从零开发。 加入 Parallax Network，开启免费挖矿 $PAX 之旅。 目前仍处于早期阶段！App 下载链接： Android (Google Play Store): https://t.co/XLtS5PuWjQ iOS (App Store): https://t.co/Saa0DqH91q 邀请码: AE68C35F @networkparallax #Parallaxnetwork #Layer1 #Blockchain #ProofOfTrust #TowerConsensus #Cryptocurrencies #Crypto #CryptoPayments #Web3 #dApp #SocialMining #DeFi #Gaming
- Sep 12, 2026
First 10M Linkers, head to the app now and claim your exciting rewards from InterLink!🎁 #InterLink #ITL #ITLG #WeAreTheFirst10M https://t.co/J4XIS4mw3q
- Sep 19, 2026
比特币（ $BTC ）在压力之下的表现释放出了看涨信号。本周，参议院未能推进《CLARITY法案》，美联储上调了利率，油价维持在100美元以上，美元走强，且10年期美债收益率触及5%。这些因素通常会对加密货币市场构成重大阻力。然而，比特币却迅速反弹，先是突破8万美元大关，随后在今天进一步攀升至接近8.2万美元的水平。 从技术面来看，它正在形成看涨的“杯状”形态（Cup and Handle pattern），并蓄势待发准备突破。一旦价格突破8.2万美元区域，将会迅速冲向10万美元，随后继续上行。 #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto
- Sep 19, 2026
The bullish signal is Bitcoin ($BTC )'s behavior under pressure. This week the Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act, the Fed raised rates, oil remained above $100, the dollar strengthened and the 10-year Treasury yield reached 5%. Those would normally be substantial crypto headwinds. Yet Bitcoin recovered rapidly moved above $80,000 then advanced to just under $82,000 today. Technically, it is forming a bullish Cup and Handle pattern and ready to breakout. Once it breaks above 82000 area, it will likely move to 100,000 quickly first then higher. #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 48x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #clarityact, #crypto.
- What is Kim H Wong's engagement rate on X?
- Kim H Wong (@Time_and_Trade) has an engagement rate of 0.078%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 157,920 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.078%, Kim H Wong sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Time_and_Trade have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Time_and_Trade post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.