Back to @TimeFarmApp's profile

Time Farm engagement report

@TimeFarmApp - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.002%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.248%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
0.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
25
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.248% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.769% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 588 interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Time Farm sits below the 10th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.148%
p750.704%
p902.63%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,635 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,696 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.148%
75th percentile0.704%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 286 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 29, 202624x their median

    📣 Something Big Is Coming We’re finalizing a major update behind the scenes. Stay close, we’ll share everything soon 🤫 https://t.co/vceDXVXR7Y

    247113062437K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 202617x their median

    ChronoTech — Path Forward: Consolidating to Ethereum Following our 22 April incident update, the team has made a final decision on remediation. We are publishing it now so the community has the same information our exchange partners do. Where we stand right now • The compromised BNB Chain TIME contract has been isolated. The fraudulent tokens cannot leak across networks — TimeBridge is decommissioned and there is no live path between chains. • Trading has been suspended on exchanges in coordination with our listing partners. This is deliberate and temporary, intended to prevent the fraudulent BSC tokens from being arbitraged out into honest order books while we execute the consolidation. • TIME supply on Ethereum was never affected by the exploit and remains untouched. The decision: retire BSC and Polygon TIME, consolidate on Ethereum We have decided not to rebuild a cross-chain bridge for TIME and not to maintain TIME deployments outside Ethereum. Instead: • The BNB Chain and Polygon TIME contracts are being retired permanently. The fraudulent 519,000 TIME on BSC, the legitimate BSC-side balances, and the Polygon-side balances are all on contracts we will no longer support. • TIME continues as a single-chain Ethereum-native asset at its original contract:  0x485d17A6f1B8780392d53D64751824253011A260 . • Total supply returns to the original 710,110 TIME — the figure on every historical tokenomics document since launch. The exploit-inflated BSC supply is excluded from circulating and total supply going forward. • Legitimate BSC and Polygon TIME holders (i.e. holders whose balances pre-date the exploit and were not part of the attacker flow) will be made whole on Ethereum on a 1:1 basis through a snapshot-and-claim process. Snapshot blocks and the claim portal will be published in a follow-up announcement. Why this path A bridge rebuild and continued multi-chain deployment were on the table, and we drafted full specs for both. We chose against them. The honest read is that multi-chain TIME is not load-bearing for the product roadmap — LaborX, the AI-agent execution layer, and any future product surface can settle on a single chain. Retiring the BSC and Polygon contracts removes the entire class of vulnerability that was exploited on 22 April. One contract, one chain, one supply number that ties out. Trading resumption Trading will resume on partner exchanges once: 1. The Ethereum contract is confirmed by listing teams as the single canonical TIME contract. 2. The BSC and Polygon TIME tickers are delisted or migrated by each venue. 3. The snapshot-and-claim process is live for legitimate BSC and Polygon holders. We are working through this with each exchange directly. We will not give a date we cannot keep — the resumption window will be named in this channel only once it is confirmed by venues. What this does and does not change • Total supply: unchanged at 710,112 TIME. • Contract on Ethereum: unchanged. • Holders on Ethereum: no action required. • Holders on BSC and Polygon: do not trade or move your TIME. Wait for the snapshot announcement. Any movement of legitimate BSC or Polygon TIME after the respective snapshot block will not be eligible for the Ethereum claim. • Exchanges: paused, coordinated, will resume on the schedule above. Next update When ready, we will publish: • The snapshot blocks on BSC and Polygon. • The eligibility criteria distinguishing legitimate holders from attacker flow. • The Ethereum claim portal URL. • The list of partner exchanges resuming trading. These will be released as each piece is confirmed, rather than bundled to a deadline. We would rather publish less and have it be accurate than publish on schedule and have to walk it back. Thank you for your patience. The decision to consolidate to Ethereum rather than rebuild the bridge or maintain multi-chain deployments is a hard one, but it is the cleanest possible answer to the question “is TIME safe to hold?” going forward. One chain, one contract, one supply number. — ChronoTech team

    5730963321K viewsView on X
  • Jan 6, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/pwDdGEmLkN

    1254398232K viewsView on X
  • Jan 30, 20267.4x their median

    🔥 Your $SECOND Is Safe Now The burn mechanism for $SECOND is now stopped! Your tokens stay safe even if you take a break and don’t open the app for a while. And yes, the biggest and most awaited news is still coming 👀 https://t.co/aFMG6aDTSJ

    97875412K viewsView on X
  • Dec 29, 20254.2x their median

    📣 Big January Update Ahead January comes with a major update and an exciting new mechanic that you're all gonna love. ⚠ That’s also when Stage 3 of the drop begins ⚠ 🕐 More info coming soon. https://t.co/Nhg6Jl5JwL

    6553509.4K viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 20263.8x their median

    📆 February Markets Are Live Hello, February! A new month is full with opportunities. All categories are updated with new prediction options, and every finished market will be resolved today. 👉 Check the app, plenty to pick from.

    5892806.5K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 20263.8x their median

    Update: Status of TIME on TON Following our announcement regarding the consolidation of TIME to Ethereum, we want to provide immediate clarity on the status of TIME on the TON blockchain. Where TON stands right now • Unaffected by the exploit: The TON chain deployment was entirely isolated from the 22 April incident. • Funds are safe: If you hold TIME on TON, your balances are secure. • No action required: TON holders do not need to participate in the snapshot-and-claim process. You do not need to move or migrate your tokens. Time Farm and Staking Operations on TON remain business as usual. • Staking functionality is fully operational: Tokens can continue to be safely deposited or withdrawn to Time Farm for staking. • Please note that all withdrawals from Time Farm will continue to be processed within our standard 7-business-day window. We are publishing this strictly to confirm that while we execute the Ethereum consolidation for BSC and Polygon, our TON deployment remains untouched and fully functional. — ChronoTech team

    383718111K viewsView on X
  • Jan 23, 20263.7x their median

    📣 Community Event Ideas Which event should appear on Time Farm next? Submit your ideas directly in the bot. 🪙 If your idea goes live, you earn commission from all generated fees. https://t.co/qe9ZeYMEda

    56530110K viewsView on X
  • Jan 1, 20262.9x their median

    🎆 Happy New Year from #TimeFarm May this year be stable, prosperous and kind to us all! We’ve refreshed the prediction markets with a full set of January options across all categories. 📲 Open the app, scan what’s new and place your January predictions. https://t.co/VDdAZ3x73z

    4861816.5K viewsView on X
  • Dec 16, 20252.9x their median

    📈 Stocks Are Live in Predictions #TimeFarm just got a bit more Wall Street. You can now predict how #Nvidia, #Apple, #Tesla, and #Alphabet behave this December. 👉 Go to Predictions and make your call. https://t.co/zf1igjAyha

    4871806.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.248% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.769% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 588 interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Time Farm's engagement rate on X?
Time Farm (@TimeFarmApp) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,311,329 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Time Farm sits below the 10th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TimeFarmApp have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @TimeFarmApp post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going