Back to @TimTebow's profile

Tim Tebow engagement report

@TimTebow - 4.1M followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 4.1M followers
Per impression
1.45%
98K views on a typical post
Reach
2.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
53 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 4.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tim Tebow's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Tim Tebow sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 202636x their median

    I don't know if we'll ever win the war against human trafficking and child sexual exploitation in this lifetime. But I know Who wins one day. And until that day comes, we'll keep fighting to rescue one more.

    47K3.9K55785622K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 202622x their median

    Freedom has a price. Today we honor those who paid it. 🙏🇺🇸

    24K2.1K16737305K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202615x their median

    The Renewed Hope Act is officially signed into law. We’re going from 7 victim identification specialists to 200. That’s thousands of boys and girls who now have a real shot at being identified and rescued. So grateful for everyone in Congress who pushed this through. But here’s the hard truth: the ICSE database has grown from 57,000 unidentified victims to 89,000 in just two years — even after 20,000 kids were rescued. We’re still losing ground faster than we’re gaining it. This fight is far from over.

    17K3.7K30778224K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202614x their median

    This map shows the 338,000+ unique IP addresses downloading and sharing child sexual abuse material within the last six months in the United States. The blue ones that you probably didn't even notice... are the ones being actively investigated. The Renewed Hope Act just became law, which will hire 200+ additional analysts to identify these boys and girls. Good is fighting back. But this isn't finished. There's still a lot more work to do — and we won't stop until every boy and girl is identified and protected.

    15K4.1K355157356K viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 202614x their median

    Happy Heavenly Father’s Day, Dad. https://t.co/LJX4hwE4eG

    18K89416427173K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202612x their median

    One Nation. Under God. Happy Independence Day! https://t.co/6eWj79U2MJ

    16K1.4K16617154K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20265.3x their median

    Every day we wait, they suffer. Right now, there are kids praying for someone to step up, step in, and do something. You answered the call to be the thin line between “tortured” and “treasured”. Congress passed the Renewed Hope Act. It's now law! Because of it, there will be 200+ additional victim ID analysts working to identify, locate, and safeguard these children, that’s 28x more than before. Thank you for emailing, calling, and urging Congress to act. This win belongs to you too. But this isn't finished. There's still a lot more work to do and we won't stop until every boy and girl is identified and protected.

    6.1K1.2K913083K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20265.2x their median

    This can't wait. Kids and teens are being targeted online right now — and every one of us has a role to play in stopping it. Not just parents. Every person in a child's life. Start with an honest conversation. Set digital boundaries. Know the warning signs. https://t.co/34c1Zm0xw9

    5.5K1.7K11231105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.3x their median

    6 months till Night to Shine 2027. Let's go!! First time hearing about it? It's not about the red carpet or the crowns. It's a celebration of someone realizing they've always had worth because they're made in the image of God. Save the date: February 12, 2027. Who's coming? https://t.co/bEdGpGQE3m

    5.5K5439329134K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20263.3x their median

    Every phone, every tablet we hand our kids — there are thousands of people on the other side of that screen whose only goal is to exploit, groom, and lure. This is part of a longer conversation I had with @titaniajordan from @barktechco — one every parent should hear. 🎙️: Parenting in a Tech World

    3.6K887592485K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 4.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Tim Tebow's engagement rate on X?
Tim Tebow (@TimTebow) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,092,216 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Tim Tebow sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TimTebow have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TimTebow post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going