Thomas Astruc ⏚ engagement report
@Thomas_Astruc - 422K followers on X
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.384%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 101K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #miraculousday, #miraculousladybug, #annonce.
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #miraculousday, #miraculousladybug, #annonce.
Compared with accounts its own size
Thomas Astruc ⏚'s engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.384%, Thomas Astruc ⏚ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 68% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 404 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 17, 202625x their median
Ils vont faire quoi les droitards quand LFI va arriver au pouvoir? Faire des manif contre l’augmentation du salaire ? Faire des manif contre la retraite à 60 ans ? Faire des manif contre le blocage des prix du carburant ? Ptddrrrrrrrrrrr
- Sep 5, 202623x their median
Look, is AI making our lives better? No. But is it making things less expensive? Unfortunately, the opposite. Now, is it making the internet a better place? More slop than ever, actually! But does it allow us to spend more time being creative? That's actually the thing it's best at stealing without shame. Though, surely it's making us smarter, right? You’ll never guess, but…
- Jul 5, 202620x their median
To hell with your Forefathers! 🖕🏽🖕🏽 #LandBack https://t.co/zcLkRm4Rtd
- Jul 4, 202613x their median
🇵🇾👀 Describe Paraguay as a team with just ONE word... https://t.co/UnLJov2DeH
- Jan 23, 202513x their median
Sam Altman: Advancing AI may require "changes to the social contract." "The entire structure of society will be up for debate and reconfiguration." https://t.co/VQLdBMFy5Y
- Jul 15, 20268.9x their median
I think the long gaps between seasons of shows are a huge part of how insane fandom has become. people get SO invested, and have years to tell themselves what the show is. their opinions about characters calcify until any evolution is seen as the writers making a mistake.
- Aug 28, 20267.3x their median
🙌 C’est LA séquence du débat d’hier. Celle d’un milieu patronal méprisant qui ricane à l’idée d’augmenter les salaires alors que c’est un besoin urgent pour des millions de salariés… et celle du seul candidat qui tient bon et qui ne cède pas, et qui amène des arguments avec dignité et fermeté. Votez @JLMelenchon !
- Sep 18, 20266.0x their median
왼쪽은 일본안, 오른쪽은 소련안. 원래 당시 국제표준으로는 소련안이 유력했습니다. 하지만 일본은 여기에 다른 디자인을 제출했고, 두 안을 둘러싼 논의 끝에 최종적으로 일본안이 채택됐습니다. 사람이 어느 방향으로 움직이는지, 그리고 그 움직임이 어떻게 ‘밖으로 나간다’는 의미로 읽히는지를 두고 경쟁한 것입니다. 저는 일본안이 확실히 더 직관적으로 보이는데, 평생 봐온 모양이라 익숙해서 그런 건지도 모르겠습니다. 처음 보는 사람에게는 어느 쪽이 더 쉽게 이해될지 궁금하네요 ㅋㅋㅋ
- Apr 22, 20266.9x their median
If you're so smart, why aren't you rich? https://t.co/p3oyAVLDyX
- Sep 17, 20263.1x their median
Redonner aux Français du pouvoir d’achat Le pouvoir d’achat est une lourde préoccupation pour les Français. L’Institut de l’Espérance place ce sujet en tête de ses priorités, parce que la possibilité pour chaque citoyen de jouir décemment du juste fruit de son travail est une question de principe fondamentale : « Quiconque travaille a droit à une rémunération équitable et satisfaisante lui assurant ainsi qu'à sa famille une existence conforme à la dignité humaine », énonce l’article 23 de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme. La précarisation de l’emploi, la baisse des rémunérations pour les emplois non qualifiés (souvent confiés à des travailleurs arrivés en France dans des conditions indignes ou tragiques), la paupérisation de secteurs entiers de la population active (comme les agriculteurs), ne permettent plus de répondre aux exigences qui figurent en tête des textes fondamentaux de la République française. Pour redresser le cap et ramener les Français sur la voie de la prospérité, l’Institut de l’Espérance a dégagé plusieurs priorités : 1) Ramener l’État à sa juste place Il faut un État puissant, donc non dispersé, et concentré sur les besoins essentiels. L’omniprésence de l’État en France étouffe l’initiative et la responsabilité. En intervenant dans tous les domaines, il complexifie les règles, alourdit les charges et freine la compétitivité. Au lieu de garantir un cadre clair et efficace, il se substitue aux acteurs économiques et sociaux, limitant leur liberté d’action. Cette dépendance structurelle crée inertie, inefficacité et découragement, au détriment de l’innovation, de la croissance et de la confiance, ce qui pèse en particulier sur l’emploi et les salaires. Dès lors, l’Institut propose que la dépense publique revienne de plus de 57% du PIB à la moyenne européenne soit 49%. Cette réduction des dépenses qui représente 250 milliards d’euros permettra un remboursement progressif de la dette et donc la diminution des intérêts financiers qui pèsent de plus en plus dramatiquement. 2) Améliorer l’efficacité de l’État « Plus d’actifs, moins de contrôleurs ». Alléger les normes et les contrôles étatiques, c’est redonner de la compétitivité aux entreprises et accélérer la création de richesse. Parmi les axes de travail prioritaires de l’Institut de l’Espérance : • Dans les services de santé : plus de soignants mieux rémunérés et moins d’administratifs ; • Dans l’éducation nationale : plus de professeurs mieux rémunérés et moins d’administratifs ; • Dans la police : plus de policiers de terrain mieux rémunérés et moins d’administratifs. 3) Réduire le millefeuille administratif Cette réduction sera permise par la suppression de deux échelons sur les cinq existants : État, région, département, communauté de communes, commune (sans compter l’Europe en 6e échelon). Le retour à la situation des années avant 1982 (État, département, commune) peut être envisagé. En plus de cette réduction, les missions de chaque type de collectivité doivent être clarifiées et spécifiées pour éviter les redondances de compétences et tous les emplois publics qui en sont la conséquence. À suivre
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.384%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 101K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #miraculousday, #miraculousladybug, #annonce.
- What is Thomas Astruc ⏚'s engagement rate on X?
- Thomas Astruc ⏚ (@Thomas_Astruc) has an engagement rate of 0.384%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 422,105 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.384%, Thomas Astruc ⏚ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Thomas_Astruc have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Thomas_Astruc post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.