Back to @Thomas1774Paine's profile

Thomas Paine engagement report

@Thomas1774Paine - 271K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 271K followers
Per impression
2.17%
5.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.97%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
116
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 271K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 164x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #fiba.

Compared with accounts its own size

Thomas Paine's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Thomas Paine sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video41% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 130 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 2026164x their median

    THE MOST RIGGED ENDING EVER WHERE IS THE EXTRA SECOND? THE BALL IS STILL IN THE AIR. WESTERN MICHIGAN WON THAT GAME. https://t.co/JtIo61jcnx

    16K1.9K3933551.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026133x their median

    Darth Vader comes out in favor of Flock cameras https://t.co/YL3jaiwIEx

    13K2.2K279353840K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026130x their median

    Stop saying we are in a cult! 😭😭😭😭😭 MAGAMorons https://t.co/gwEreDOlhO

    12K2.2K361287254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202673x their median

    WESTERN MICHIGAN GOT ROBBED REFS PUT 1 SECOND ON THE CLOCK 😭 https://t.co/WwqZl1jD7h

    7.6K53421698342K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202638x their median

    The green dildo has returned to the WNBA. https://t.co/x4iqeGCMbs

    3.6K20653285434K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202625x their median

    Howard Stern is looking good. I think it’s time for another Covid booster shot. https://t.co/SSMWzVoAYf

    2.5K17219317631K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202624x their median

    MAMDANI: “These documents show what the city knew about toxic air around Ground Zero, when they knew it and how they acted to limit liability.” City Hall released 170,000 pages today. Hundreds of thousands more will follow over the next year, free to every New Yorker. “They will help New Yorkers access the healthcare they need.”

    2.1K626292053K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202619x their median

    Tucker Carlson exposes how Trump sold his soul to Israel, betrayed his voters, destroyed America and obliterated his legacy all for the sake of Benjamin Netanyahu. It's so sad. So many of us had real hope for the first time in years. Beware the man who speaks beautiful lies while quietly perfecting the art of betrayal. His greatest deception isn’t the lie he tells the world—it’s the trust he destroys in the people who believed him most https://t.co/RwQAYVt36T

    1.7K460631623K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202617x their median

    The hardest part of a three day war is the first seven months …

    1.7K19315119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266.4x their median

    Carlynton and Keystone Oaks youth football. I mean … what are we doing here? https://t.co/rAH9AYGunX

    5253117219109K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fiba

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 271K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 164x its own typical post.

What is Thomas Paine's engagement rate on X?
Thomas Paine (@Thomas1774Paine) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 270,509 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Thomas Paine sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Thomas1774Paine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Thomas1774Paine post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going