Back to @ThisWeekABC's profile

This Week engagement report

@ThisWeekABC - 229K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 229K followers
Per impression
1.07%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

This Week's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, This Week sits above the 10th percentile of the 198,241 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.14%
p750.664%
p902.52%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 198,241 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,931 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.14%
75th percentile0.664%
90th percentile2.52%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link84% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 84% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 253 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202634x their median

    ABC News’ @jonkarl breaks down political, economic and legal developments involving President Trump this week. https://t.co/HfuRA3cF0M

    93223610316296K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.6x their median

    President Trump continues to tout his various building projects at the White House and around Washington, D.C., amid the war in Iran and growing concerns about rising prices. ABC News’ @jonkarl reports. https://t.co/2yhi86J5m0 https://t.co/VW0JHzzkfX

    2073740512K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.2x their median

    As affordability remains a top campaign issue ahead of the midterms, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott told @JonKarl “we all need to have prices lowered, especially at the price at the pump." "And I think the president is on a track to get us there. https://t.co/CwqWe3Uuck https://t.co/kukGuNdQWc

    13233611113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.3x their median

    Jacob Coxon, a former OpenAI and Anthropic employee who quit his job at Anthropic this week, likened building AI to “summoning an alien species.” “I think thinking about it in terms of an alien mind that we don't fully understand is pretty terrifying, even without any concrete scenario.” https://t.co/hPvhLGWElz

    6825482268K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.2x their median

    “I have pressed pause on any new data center being able to join the operations in the state of Texas.” As AI data centers become a political flashpoint ahead of the midterm elections, @JonKarl sat down with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to discuss how his state is responding. https://t.co/Xfr7DTOUv3

    6122261125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.1x their median

    Ontario Premier Doug Ford acknowledges that things “got heated” in his recent exchange with President Trump. “You’ve got to eventually stand up to someone that just continuously attacks our country … It's unfortunate that he stoops down to that level, and unfortunately, I did that day.” https://t.co/bH5OmHUnJj

    60223347.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20263.1x their median

    “[Voter sentiment] isn’t pro-Democrat. It’s anti-Trump.” With the midterms five weeks away, analyst Charlie Cook shares his predictions for the future of the House and Senate. https://t.co/0v7vvwnMUk https://t.co/wk5Q96V587

    74211925.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.9x their median

    Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall III criticizes Secretary Pete Hegseth amid reports about his leadership at the Pentagon. “I’ve never seen an attempt to politicize our military like the one being conducted by Pete Hegseth.” https://t.co/epkMjaaGXj https://t.co/KzBuULRsq1

    57272515.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.4x their median

    Sen. Mark Kelly says he doesn’t believe President Trump and Chinese President Xi “had a serious discussion” about AI during their visit. https://t.co/tvgO4ZA0NF https://t.co/NAEG5PC2md

    3194744.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.3x their median

    Ontario Premier Doug Ford tells Martha Raddatz that potential U.S. tariffs on Canada “probably the worst move [President Trump] could ever do.” “A tariff on Canada is nothing more than a tax on the American people.” https://t.co/8Rp6lFtgvN https://t.co/ccH0xsoaqG

    45182325.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

What is This Week's engagement rate on X?
This Week (@ThisWeekABC) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 228,662 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, This Week sits above the 10th percentile of the 198,241 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ThisWeekABC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ThisWeekABC post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going