PlayerSells
Back to @TheXclusiveAce's profile

Xclusive Ace engagement report

@TheXclusiveAce - 2.0M followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 2.0M followers
Per impression
0.904%
63K views on a typical post
Reach
3.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
566
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 566 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 63K times each, and 0.904% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Xclusive Ace's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Xclusive Ace sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.046%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link63% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+12%+10% to +15%6.3K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 328 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 12% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 201860x their median

    I'm Batman. https://t.co/LXgLnen2TF

    28K5.4K552396View on X
  • Jul 9, 20264.7x their median

    I'm shocked to see the emblem editor made it into the BO2 port https://t.co/CR5iMK8Ngb

    2.6K50446156K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 20263.8x their median

    FINALLY a complete ground up redesign of the UI for MW4 instead of basically the same general design with some changes from one year to the next. This may seem minor but it goes a long way to making a game feel truly unique. I'm just hoping navigating this UI will be solid. https://t.co/VpYtw3EQ7w

    2.0K6946264K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.6x their median

    I've been getting some gameplay for the new guns in Black Ops 7 and I still can't get over how unenjoyable this game has become with the new matchmaking. This was my favorite modern CoD but unless something changes, I don't see myself playing it beyond the bare minimum for work.

    1.8K7513313161K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 20262.5x their median

    I genuinely love Black Ops 7 overall but I'm getting really tired of the constant Swordfish lobbies that make it feel like everyone else is playing Hardcore while I'm playing Core by using different guns

    1.2K3111311101K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20262.5x their median

    I'm going to just focus on videos and private match testing for a few days to let things settle in with BO7. This is the worst the game has felt for me since the first week of the beta.

    1.2K3411712147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.3x their median

    It's been a couple weeks since the big Matchmaking change in BO7 and I've been completely avoiding anything but the very limited Open matchmaking modes so I decided to try out some Quickplay TDM to see if things had settled or if maybe I overreacted with my initial impressions. I didn't... This was my first match on as I tried to grind some Tempest camo progress on the Sturmwolf. Everyone was using a meta gun and there was 0 room for error. The surprising part is there was only 1 party of 2 and everyone else was solo so it's not just a case of me filling into a lobby with a couple of really coordinated, high skill parties which can happen; this felt like a very carefully tailored experience because the odds of getting 12 mostly solo players of this caliber into the same lobby without some heavy-handed matchmaking should be extremely low. They advertised more match variety with this system but I'm not sure I've ever experienced such a strict feeling system in pub TDM. At least the team balancing is working I guess.

    1.1K561371185K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20261.8x their median

    While I still love the crazy movement of BO7, the Black Ops Classic playlist is such a great change of pace for CoD. To me, it really highlights the fact that some part of the formula have been lost over the years with CoD as it transitioned into more of a movement shooter.

    9253254344K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2026

    Oh boy. It's time! https://t.co/eGyRcz7S0p

    7551930070K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026

    I'd love to be continuing the BO7 camo grind but I'm not happy with the state of the game after the Season 5 update so let's play some MWIII! LIVE Now: https://t.co/xQYqa0KHMo https://t.co/fT8qOzGfjr

    7091549360K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 566 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 63K times each, and 0.904% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

What is Xclusive Ace's engagement rate on X?
Xclusive Ace (@TheXclusiveAce) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,988,908 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Xclusive Ace sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheXclusiveAce have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheXclusiveAce post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Xclusive Ace (@TheXclusiveAce) Engagement Rate - 0.029% | PlayerSells