Back to @TheWyteRabbit1's profile

The White Rabbit engagement report

@TheWyteRabbit1 - 135K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.121%
of 135K followers
Per impression
3.17%
4.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
156
interactions (median)
Saved
0.568%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.27/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.121%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 163x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The White Rabbit's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.121%, The White Rabbit sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 119 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026163x their median

    Candace Owens broke the internet by claiming that Zionists are not the original Jews but are actually demon worshipers. https://t.co/lKZalxz0Xi

    19K4.9K885263365K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026145x their median

    Hollywood subconsciously introducing/worshipping the demon Buer in its current movies. https://t.co/5cCCqL2ulo

    20K1.6K6663221.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026140x their median

    🚨The conspiracy theorists tried to warn you . Australian citizens will require 100 social credit score points from their digital ID to use social media with the police having access to ALL accounts, including private messaging. https://t.co/b50aOqDh7f

    14K6.0K818621731K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026131x their median

    I wonder why Fox News covered Nick Shirley’s fraud reporting 30+ times but never covered Tyler Oliveira’s. I think I already know the answer... https://t.co/scPdXbH7UU

    18K1.8K16837274K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202615x their median

    🚀🇷🇺 Russia just unveiled their new UNSTOPPABLE DRONES https://t.co/YHzx7btQrk

    2.0K2086744179K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202613x their median

    If this was predicted 27 years ago, somebody knew something." A book published in 1997 predicted the exact agendas we're currently facing, with unsettling accuracy. The book is titled '2025: Scenarios of Global and U.S. Society Reshaped by Science and Technology.' https://t.co/cDAF6FOLQC

    1.5K4122623112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202611x their median

    Did you know that Anne Heche was making a documentary about Child Sex Trafficking in Hollywood when she was involved in a car crash in 2022? LAPD initially claimed she “died on the spot”, but drone footage showed medics throwing her into an ambulance as she tried to escape from a body bag. She was pronounced dead 6 days later. She knew too much…

    1.3K449451035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20267.9x their median

    The Occult Origins of Netflix https://t.co/YEda6vU0Uo

    890312171225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.9x their median

    It’s incredible how many people completely miss these obvious hand signs. https://t.co/UiWfXTaCeG

    8192791022519K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.1x their median

    The Pope and Satanic symbolism. This is horrifying... https://t.co/42cVDfphx9

    63827324921K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.121%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 163x its own typical post.

What is The White Rabbit's engagement rate on X?
The White Rabbit (@TheWyteRabbit1) has an engagement rate of 0.121%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 134,622 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.121%, The White Rabbit sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheWyteRabbit1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheWyteRabbit1 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going