Back to @TheStripesGirl's profile

#Anonymous engagement report

@TheStripesGirl - 61K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.013%
of 61K followers
Per impression
2.14%
350 views on a typical post
Reach
0.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 61K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 350 times each, and 2.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.574% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 492x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #abolishice, #ice, #trump.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #abolishice, #ice, #trump.

Compared with accounts its own size

#Anonymous's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, #Anonymous sits above the 10th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 206,113 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,273 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 193 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 2026492x their median

    Describe Pete Hegseth in 1 word. https://t.co/5wavHjSV6q

    147393.6K11351K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20268.8x their median

    This is what Heritage Foundation wants. This is what Trump wants. Remember this before you vote. #ICE #AbolishICE #FckTrmp #VOTEBLUE https://t.co/v1cdAm5e4Y

    3124132515 viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20267.6x their median

    "Zohran Mamdani on the New York City ICE shooting: β€œThere is no explanation for these tactics. There is no explanation for federal officers firing this many rounds into a car that has a five year old in the car. Residents have no idea if these are law enforcement agents or if they are simply attacking someone on the street.” Zohran is tearing into ICE right now as he should. ICE terrorises people. ABOLISH ICE."

    352150776 viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20266.8x their median

    πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™€οΈ. #Trump said the White House helipad was something "they wanted for 150 years" β€” the helicopter was invented 87 years ago. https://t.co/o1p03dtlly

    3411811.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20264.4x their median

    "This was two months ago. It’s only gotten worse. How do people still listen and digest this shit?" #CostOfTrumpsCorruption #FckTrmp #VOTEBLUE https://t.co/Ed0wBz0elB

    147140883 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.3x their median

    πŸš¨πŸš¨πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸš¨πŸš¨ URGENT! I just donated to one of my very best friends of over ten years now and his family in #Gaza and I'm imploring anyone with the heart as well as the means to join me in donating today, whether it be $5 or you match my donation of $150. Those of you who know me know me well - this is not a game when I say "I beg you" or "They are suffering", you know I mean it, and I mean it because I'm being desperately sincere, and they ARE suffering. WINTER IS COMING FAST THERE!!! Please, they not just need money for food, they also need supplies, warm clothes, new bedding..... The wet, cold Gaza winters when living in just a tent on sand ruin everything inside as the icy waters flood in. Then there's the wind. Some people donate to others who lost a pet, or a job, or even send money for scumbags like Andrew and Tristan Tate, who are raking in donations, so how about, please, you help with any donation amount to one of my very, very best friends, who I always said knows me better than I know myself, and his wife and three young children who are suffering greatly in the sand, where gunfire is daily, attacking drones stalk citizens.... This is JUST a family, and Ahmed used to be an Anonymous Anon named Leto, who never once supported Hamas, ever. His kids, Messo, Rawand and Khalel are INNOCENT CHILDREN, and his wife is just a mom, like me. The difference is, one of MY children died, but she still has her three, and I will do all I can to keep it that way!! I can't let Ahmed lose a child if I can help it. πŸ™πŸΌ Please donate what you can today. Call it your random act of kindness to some very, very good people. Please. πŸ™πŸΌβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ«‚πŸ«‚πŸ™πŸΌπŸ™πŸΌπŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ Here is the link, also in my bio... https://t.co/TdyyyywEQB

    2111112.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.3x their median

    The whiniest of all the whiny bitches out there. #FckTrmp #VOTEBLUE https://t.co/r6OUKzxuD1

    13661632 viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.0x their median

    In defiance of the most recent under the table deal that the #Trump admin made with #Russia. #Ukraine has hit fuel sites deep inside Russia. Trumps shocking decision to side with Russia will only prolong this war further. #NAFO #Smokefleet https://t.co/ViFsH7ajDM

    13920358 viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20262.6x their median

    What????? πŸ€ͺ #Trump does an incoherent ramble as a confused audience listens in complete silence: "And you know what they're doing? They go straight down, you know, you can make those drill bits talk. You can make 'em sing, you can make them go, they go down. New York's over here, Pennsylvania-- they go down and they take a sharp left. And they suck our oil out. Can you believe it? Lines of different states, and you'll see one has Cadillacs, because they like Cadillacs better than they like Mercedes"

    114601.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20262.3x their median

    https://t.co/zj9stTlDDP

    18000642 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#abolishice#ice#trump#fcktrmp#voteblue

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 61K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 350 times each, and 2.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.574% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 492x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #abolishice, #ice, #trump.

What is #Anonymous's engagement rate on X?
#Anonymous (@TheStripesGirl) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 61,014 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, #Anonymous sits above the 10th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheStripesGirl have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheStripesGirl post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going