Back to @TheSilvapr's profile

$ilva πŸ’Έ engagement report

@TheSilvapr - 124K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.111%
of 124K followers
Per impression
2.37%
5.8K views on a typical post
Reach
4.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
136
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 124K followers, an engagement rate of 0.111%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 2.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 51x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bigyinks, #doinglife, #moneynacrudeoil.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #bigyinks, #doinglife, #moneynacrudeoil.

Compared with accounts its own size

$ilva πŸ’Έ's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.111%, $ilva πŸ’Έ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202651x their median

    Enugu traffic officers are on another level πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ See as this guy dey patiently wait for somebody to break traffic so he can finally have work to do 😭 https://t.co/wVU3AYfrGc

    6.0K54429498404K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202610.0x their median

    Lifestyling ✨ https://t.co/PxUnlgmxol

    86929118313123K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20264.6x their median

    Went out yesterday and the compliments on this Jalabia were plenty. πŸ˜‚ All thanks to @plsLoveaintreal. She really sells the best. 🌹❀️✨ https://t.co/ERjhGboR7L

    36516484621K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20264.1x their median

    Omo this Tunde Onakoya guy motion still dey burst my head, from playing chess for Oshodi to partnering with Hermes in ParisπŸ™†πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ If you give up na you fuck up o!πŸ˜‚πŸ˜­πŸ™πŸΎ https://t.co/u6CRXIZYgB

    4438034125K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    I am never seen anyone with God that fails Just keep trusting God

    9250251779 viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Na only for this app never play this Lagos life game 😭😭😭

    58341302.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    drop a video of yourself that you really like https://t.co/QGFHEWVhng

    2719351.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    Giving an ex-convict you barely know your female toddler to watch over is highly irresponsible. Sure, it turned out okay, but girllll hell no. #DoingLife https://t.co/KqZlOzBYEc

    216853.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Just watched a video of a lady that fell off a stair railing because she wanted to do content Oh chimmmmmmoooo πŸ˜­πŸ˜­πŸ€¦πŸ½β€β™€οΈ Omo thank God nothing happened to her o

    23215.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    Men 🀝 Taking unnecessary risk.

    00016.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bigyinks#doinglife#moneynacrudeoil

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 124K followers, an engagement rate of 0.111%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 2.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 51x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bigyinks, #doinglife, #moneynacrudeoil.

What is $ilva πŸ’Έ's engagement rate on X?
$ilva πŸ’Έ (@TheSilvapr) has an engagement rate of 0.111%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 123,688 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.111%, $ilva πŸ’Έ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheSilvapr have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheSilvapr post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going