Back to @TheFBReels's profile

Football 🏈 engagement report

@TheFBReels - 207K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.431%
of 207K followers
Per impression
1.49%
60K views on a typical post
Reach
28.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
893
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.9/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 893 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.431%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nfl, #sportsbetting, #epl.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #nfl, #sportsbetting, #epl.

Compared with accounts its own size

Football 🏈's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.431%, Football 🏈 sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 202618x their median

    Never forget when Jalen Ramsey had the sassiest interview of all time 😭 https://t.co/cnZsv0zOnT

    14K8962914364.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.6x their median

    Games that Rams DE Myles Garrett now will miss by undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery and being placed on injured reserve: 🏈Giants 🏈at Broncos 🏈at Eagles 🏈Bills https://t.co/CQxq3o1hx1

    6.6K4583182941.8M viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 2026

    UTSA’s QB is the first player to create a highlight then be put on one in the same playπŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€ https://t.co/nWwyM6rxzz

    1.5K6267163K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20261.8x their median

    Savvy play by TJ Hockenson to stop short of the end zone MIAvsMIN on FOX/FOX One Stream on @NFLPlus https://t.co/z81tAE4wNy

    1.3K60149967.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    Josh Allen tush push TD πŸ—£οΈ BUFvsHOU on CBS/Paramount+ https://t.co/Hy2DrhaiCu

    813864929273K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    🚨 THE GREATEST SPORTS MONTH GIVEAWAY 1,000 Courtside Cash in free picks, 4 hats, and a sweatshirt up for grabs MLB playoffs, WNBA playoffs, NHL's back, NFL's rolling, and NBA right around the corner. 🀯 repost this and enter at the link below πŸ‘‡

    21663534848K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    Had the JV center play corner πŸ’€ https://t.co/cqABHu7qbD

    278358960K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    Bro hit a home run, kicked a door down, and aired the scene in 5 seconds πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/WjNDLcposh

    161105.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    🏈ARE NFL REFS BECOMING THE MAIN CHARACTER? πŸ“ΊWatch the full show: πŸ”— https://t.co/3vcXTYSZYj @DonnieRightSide & @JeffNadu are already seeing the flags pile upβ€”and now there’s controversy over an official allegedly telling Trey McBride β€œF you” twice. 😳 https://t.co/Lc8Hm7BtDW

    840523K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    🚨 CROSSING LINES EXCLUSIVE ODDS BOOST 🚨 🏈 MNF: Falcons ML vs. Saints ⏰ LIVE at 12 PM ET with @DonnieRightSide & @JeffNadu πŸ”— https://t.co/y2lm2WiCS2 Was +105 ➑️ Now ??? πŸ‘€πŸ”₯ How high are we boosting it? πŸ’° πŸ“Ί Watch Crossing Lines TODAY to find out! https://t.co/uj4AtyEEDt

    1030417K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nfl#sportsbetting#epl#nflinjuries

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 893 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.431%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nfl, #sportsbetting, #epl.

What is Football 🏈's engagement rate on X?
Football 🏈 (@TheFBReels) has an engagement rate of 0.431%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 206,849 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.431%, Football 🏈 sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheFBReels have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheFBReels post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going