Back to @TheCryptoSquire's profile

John Squire engagement report

@TheCryptoSquire - 553K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 553K followers
Per impression
1.82%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
2.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
267
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.73/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 267 interactions against 553K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 110x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #flr, #xrp.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026. Recurring tags: #flr, #xrp.

Compared with accounts its own size

John Squire's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, John Squire sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 449 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026110x their median

    This afternoon, Senate Democrats proved they were never truly serious about protecting consumers and preserving American leadership. I sat at the table with Senate Democrats working in good faith to get this done while they played games. For over a year, they presented demands and the second we met them, they made new demands and moved the goal posts. Today they voted against real limitations on politicians’ personal crypto investments. They voted against protecting American consumers from the scammers and fraudsters this bill would have shut down. They voted against American leadership, and handed China and every one of our foreign competitors exactly what they wanted. Democrats chose politics over the American people—again. That’s not leadership on their part, that’s surrender to their radical, socialist base. The once-proud Democratic party is anti-consumer and pro-illicit finance, anti-ethics, anti-free enterprise, anti-worker, anti-livable wage jobs, and pro-socialism. The Democrats are now anti-American. Sad!

    23K4.2K2.0K365682K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202646x their median

    If the CLARITY Act doesn’t pass today, there’s a Plan B. PLAN B: https://t.co/JVeD8kmPLH

    10K1.2K590208572K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202644x their median

    https://t.co/N87oIV8mXC

    8.8K2.0K5024001.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202623x their median

    Trump didn’t thank the CEO of Ethereum. Bitcoin doesn’t even have a CEO. He looked at Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse and said: “Thank you very much, Brad.” Let that sink in. 👀 ripple:native https://t.co/sPPzX87Ma6

    5.4K69111831252K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202617x their median

    NOW EVERYTHING MAKES SENSE. https://t.co/OZCgzvQegd

    3.8K49214152224K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202610x their median

    🚨🇺🇸 BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! 💥🔥 RIGHT NOW, ALL EYES ARE ON NASDAQ! WALL STREET IS OPENING ANOTHER DOOR TO XRP! Evernorth ($XRPN) is expected to make its Nasdaq debut with approximately 473 MILLION XRP in its treasury. THIS IS GETTING SERIOUS! 👀🚀 https://t.co/iILFz34txe

    2.2K37813421100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20269.0x their median

    TRUMP: “I will defend the right of every one of our 50 million American crypto holders to control their own assets.” After what happened with the CLARITY Act yesterday, these words hit differently. Mr. President, crypto is waiting. https://t.co/pFoyvBW7lJ

    2.0K325669100K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20268.6x their median

    Tomorrow, we ring the @Nasdaq Closing Bell. Join us to celebrate our debut of $XRPN, including live interviews from our countdown event at Nasdaq. Countdown starts at 2:30 p.m. ET. Watch here: The Block: @TheBlockCo Talking Tokens: @_TalkingTokens Nasdaq: https://t.co/PMnfEJMELu Not investment advice or an offer of securities. Contains forward-looking statements; actual results may differ materially. Risk factors: https://t.co/zkVF2SAjQw

    1.8K374806176K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.1x their median

    Jake Claver is STILL standing by his $750+ XRP prediction before the end of 2026. And his extreme scenario? $1,500–$2,000. 🤯 At this point, I don’t need hopium… I need Jake to be fucking right. 😂🚀 https://t.co/HPrZbWE9ME

    1.9K1511451153K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.1x their median

    THE IRONY OF TODAY’S CLARITY ACT VOTE Some Senators voted NO claiming they wanted to stop President Trump and his family from profiting from crypto. But think about what they actually achieved. By blocking the CLARITY Act, they didn’t stop Trump from making money from crypto. They stopped the legislation that was supposed to establish clear rules, stronger oversight, consumer protections and ethics restrictions for the industry. Trump can continue doing what he was already legally allowed to do. Meanwhile, millions of American crypto holders, companies, investors and developers are left waiting for regulatory clarity once again. If your objective was to restrict conflicts of interest, negotiate stronger ethics provisions. Don’t kill the entire regulatory framework and then pretend the problem has been solved. Trump wasn’t stopped today. Crypto regulation was.

    1.7K3001242883K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#flr#xrp

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 267 interactions against 553K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 110x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #flr, #xrp.

What is John Squire's engagement rate on X?
John Squire (@TheCryptoSquire) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 553,472 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, John Squire sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheCryptoSquire have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheCryptoSquire post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going