Back to @TheAnfieldWrap's profile

The Anfield Wrap engagement report

@TheAnfieldWrap - 701K followers on X

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 701K followers
Per impression
0.2%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
2.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 701K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 751x its own typical post.

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Anfield Wrap's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, The Anfield Wrap sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link45% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 45% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 194 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 2026751x their median

    Harvey Elliott has joined Valencia on loan for the rest of the 2026-27 season. We all wish Harvey the best of luck during his time with Valencia 💎 https://t.co/i2gri2pBrC

    19K1.3K263214639K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026489x their median

    Jeremy ranks second for duel success in the @PremierLeague so far this season 💪 https://t.co/JaJ3dTTMea

    13K6935828335K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026412x their median

    Trey Nyoni has been called up to the @England U21s squad 🦁 https://t.co/zhD4JFuSRf

    11K4026434332K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026354x their median

    A simply beautiful footballer. https://t.co/FFc1Bq5KFI

    8.4K1.3K92128191K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026234x their median

    Not now Mo lad https://t.co/LgVOBtmRVr

    6.3K1563120219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026146x their median

    Yes Dom ✊ https://t.co/04kYqGzDjP

    3.9K1482811434K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026131x their median

    Boss when he came on today 🇪🇸 https://t.co/auKxf4z1xa

    3.6K5428546K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202663x their median

    'The reason Jürgen Klopp builds a team that takes 110 from 114 and wins a European Cup and World Club Cup during that time span, the reason those players focus and treat every game as though it meant everything is because they were trying to beat a team that had cheated to the tune of £900m up to the end of the 17/18 season.' ✍️ @Knox_Harrington’s column… 👉 Read here: https://t.co/jKvSJYdKSn

    1.5K2272920187K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202662x their median

    Love him https://t.co/XKCGhHc7Nv

    1.7K2319422K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202648x their median

    Two years ago today hahahaha https://t.co/ZxZGIBK9so

    1.3K3874100K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 701K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 751x its own typical post.

What is The Anfield Wrap's engagement rate on X?
The Anfield Wrap (@TheAnfieldWrap) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 88 original posts from the last 30 days against 701,096 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, The Anfield Wrap sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheAnfieldWrap have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheAnfieldWrap post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going