Back to @TheAIColony's profile

The AI Colony engagement report

@TheAIColony - 231K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.143%
of 231K followers
Per impression
0.517%
64K views on a typical post
Reach
27.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
330
interactions (median)
Saved
0.183%
117 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.27/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 330 interactions against 231K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 0.517% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai3d, #deemostech, #hyper3d.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai3d, #deemostech, #hyper3d.

Compared with accounts its own size

The AI Colony's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.143%, The AI Colony sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,313 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,878 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video66% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 303 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20263.6x their median

    🌍 What if an AI-generated world didn’t end after a few seconds—but kept running for hours, responded to every move, let you attack, cast spells, shoot, or summon storms, and continued evolving through AI agents? That’s LingBot-World 2.0: our open-source real-time interactive world model, scaling to 720p/60fps in our full setup. Today, we’re open-sourcing 3 more models: 🔹 LingBot-World 2.0 Small (1.3B) 🔹 LingBot-World 2.0 Bidirectional 🔹 LingBot-World 2.0 Causal Pretrain And now, with our 1.3B Small Model, that world can run in real time on a single consumer GPU. 🧵

    810144881312.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.3x their median

    AI is getting out of hand 🤯 https://t.co/cPT5u2tYX7

    5921023918121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.7x their median

    AI video just crossed another line. Kling 4.0 isn’t just making one character move realistically anymore. This fight has multiple characters moving at once, huge actions happening across the frame, AND a moving camera, and somehow, the whole scene holds together. This is where AI video starts getting scary good.

    4429510166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.6x their median

    Done in 4 steps! We built an interactive instrument-playing website with Hyper Rodin MCP + GPT-6 https://t.co/5c8IIbUEjl

    472499197K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.6x their median

    Breaking: It's been less than 24 hours since Claude Opus 5.5 launched. And People are already building mind-blowing things with it. 10 wild examples so far:

    43169232168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.5x their median

    Xiaomi’s MiMo V2.6 Pro just landed at 46 on Artificial Analysis’ Intelligence Index, making it the highest-scoring open-weights model there right now but the number that caught our attention is $0.13 per Intelligence Index task, enough to put it directly on the intelligence-cost Pareto frontier. What makes the release more interesting is how Xiaomi got there. Rather than relying on a larger pretraining run, V2.6 leans heavily on post-training and reinforcement-learning environments built around tasks, interaction and evaluation. Xiaomi has also released thousands of those RL environments alongside the model. Benchmarks will move, but pushing this much capability while keeping the cost this low feels like the part worth watching especially if the research and agentic workloads Xiaomi is showing translate outside controlled demos.

    4604380116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    everyone is using GPT-6 Astra to make games... i had it build me a robot prototyper i type what robot i want, and it builds the whole thing and tells me how to make it real one prompt: "prototype me a full Microduck" it designed every part, checked nothing crashes into itself when it moves, did the motor maths so the thing can actually stand up, and handed me the parts list with prices and the step by step assembly not a render, a robot i can build this weekend every piece is ready to send straight to a 3D printer, and the motors and screws come with prices and where to buy them took me 45 minutes and 5 prompts to build (burnt all my limits) process below

    4012450756K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    China just unveiled autonomous robotic fish for underwater surveillance. They swim like real fish. But they’re robots. https://t.co/Ty9jPeBZcG

    358672819103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Two warriors face off in a cinematic bamboo forest, with every strike, block, and counterattack planned before generation. 3D Director Studio is @pippitofficial's 3D workspace for planning a scene before you generate it, 150+ props, a character action library, keyframe timing on a timeline, drawn movement trajectories and full camera control, all before Seedance 2.5 renders a frame. For this scene, we arranged two fighters and choreographed their movements to create a fast-paced battle sequence. Every position, action, and camera angle was planned in the 3D workspace before bringing the scene to life with Seedance 2.5. Try Pippit 3D Director Studio:https://t.co/ri2tbC3LP4 #3DDirectorStudio #PippitAI #Seedance25 #PippitPartner

    380557095K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    🚨 Creative professionals just ranked the biggest AI models. OpenArt Arena hid the model names and let the actual outputs decide the results.  Here’s what the judges actually saw. https://t.co/KWiudxi841

    354459187K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ai3d#deemostech#hyper3d#rodin#worldgen

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 330 interactions against 231K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 0.517% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai3d, #deemostech, #hyper3d.

What is The AI Colony's engagement rate on X?
The AI Colony (@TheAIColony) has an engagement rate of 0.143%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 230,905 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.143%, The AI Colony sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheAIColony have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheAIColony post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going