Back to @Th0masHD's profile

Th0masHD engagement report

@Th0masHD - 687K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.113%
of 687K followers
Per impression
2.49%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
4.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
773
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 773 interactions against 687K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 2.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Th0masHD's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.113%, Th0masHD sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 64 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 202416x their median

    2nd place Globals ($300.000) w/ @QueasyFN 🙂 @heroic_fortnite https://t.co/lCowtYKyiS

    12K245270111.3M viewsView on X
  • May 30, 20265.3x their median

    24🫡

    4.5K392960123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.1x their median

    1st place division cup finals ($5,000) @FoCuSFNBR @RazZzero0oFN https://t.co/rJMio4F0iE

    3.8K6491484K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20264.7x their median

    1st place div finals ($10.000) @FoCuSFNBR @RazZzero0oFN @virtuspro_FN https://t.co/07qxw3w2g1

    3.5K68108276K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.8x their median

    Always just a failure with no luck on my side😢

    3.6K39710101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.8x their median

    5th place FNCS grands ($40,000) @FoCuSFNBR @RazZzero0oFN 5-0 off spawn third time getting conned while being lan qualed 🤠 https://t.co/EODli2QKtU

    2.8K5059479K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.0x their median

    Heatwave in grands @FoCuSFNBR @RazZzero0oFN https://t.co/rqW5mwQL45

    2.2K3675153K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.0x their median

    +1600$ @FoCuSFNBR @RazZzero0oFN https://t.co/8ia6Ovqfut

    2.2K2944163K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 20262.5x their median

    Landing heatwave harbor for major 2 + globals https://t.co/I1ucWVxCDA

    2.2K33323109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.3x their median

    +800$ @FoCuSFNBR @RazZzero0oFN https://t.co/MZbyNSweT8

    1.8K2124042K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 773 interactions against 687K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 2.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Th0masHD's engagement rate on X?
Th0masHD (@Th0masHD) has an engagement rate of 0.113%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 687,381 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.113%, Th0masHD sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Th0masHD have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Th0masHD post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going