Back to @TetatitaInt's profile

Tetatita Int engagement report

@TetatitaInt - 391K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 391K followers
Per impression
1.38%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
164
interactions (median)
Saved
0.377%
45 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tetatita Int's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Tetatita Int sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 169 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 202628x their median

    non dimenticarti di lavare la macchina https://t.co/duTmDXr7M5 https://t.co/b6pgUu1Yia

    4.2K3738263K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202615x their median

    Experts say that if you don't jerk off watching 'Shower with Bel Gris 6' before the eclipse, you'll go blind. 🆕https://t.co/Y4DhqHL9xu🆕 https://t.co/c8DsySCpHq

    2.3K2247151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20268.7x their median

    O motor do barco da Bel aquece, por isso ela tem de parar para cantar uma música e masturbar-se. 🆕https://t.co/nICVihPAdt🆕 *Para assinantes Bel Gris Selection e Premium. https://t.co/9i4SDpiME3

    1.3K781124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20265.8x their median

    Er war der erste Schauspieler, der Bel am Set oral befriedigt hat 👇 https://t.co/y2ivEh0S8n Sogar die Jungs aus der Umkleide haben uns einen Beitrag gewidmet👇 https://t.co/eLhw7nlelZ https://t.co/T1lvPNtqa5

    872705032K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.5x their median

    Apparently you like this Bel Gris Selection video. Why? https://t.co/C7NjS7gDUJ https://t.co/4NIQfXpY5O

    837614127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.4x their median

    Às vezes, o bom, se breve, é 2 vezes bom. Hoje proponho um desafio com Tommy Cabrio. Relaxe durante 2 minutos a ver o seu vídeo. 🆕https://t.co/HIdn1NNBKh🆕 *Bel Gris Selection & Premium subscribers. https://t.co/rBUYSRJWMp

    794901011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    🤪 https://t.co/CjD8fPc8vs https://t.co/grRiakGRa5

    18992010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Chi pensa che la masturbazione sia una perdita di energia e che sia dannosa, non venga come pubblico a Notti Audaci. Presto annunceremo una nuova data. Per il momento vi offriamo la seconda parte di "Amore da vedere ano" https://t.co/xchuPm1WNl https://t.co/PwEIg9RuVC

    181143014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    "Noches Atrevidas" est une émission en direct que nous faisons sur tetatitatv. Nous annoncerons bientôt la prochaine. 🆕https://t.co/l1nlgASina🆕 https://t.co/f0f2JwV1gI

    149100116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    Últimas novedades Tetatita + Bel Gris Selection. https://t.co/EBNf3WZp6L Last new things Tetatita + Bel Gris Selection https://t.co/KIyqprdgly

    14570018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is Tetatita Int's engagement rate on X?
Tetatita Int (@TetatitaInt) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 390,710 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Tetatita Int sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TetatitaInt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TetatitaInt post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going