Back to @Terroriser's profile

Terroriser engagement report

@Terroriser - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.169%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
3.89%
56K views on a typical post
Reach
4.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.293%
165 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 3.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 82% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Terroriser's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.169%, Terroriser sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,148 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,016 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 96 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202627x their median

    how it feels willingly playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow six: siege https://t.co/Mvte47aKvY

    54K3.7K4844236.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20266.6x their median

    Unlucky Mexico. The World Cup won’t be as good without the Mexican fans. They never quit.

    13K419875228K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20265.2x their median

    Working with Nogla can be torture… https://t.co/9yz8LReNUh

    11K484505164K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20264.9x their median

    Found myself in the Subway I worked in for years today… this is where I earned the money to buy a copy of GTA5 Which changed my life! 👏 https://t.co/H0CSTuUGUW

    10K217730124K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20263.5x their median

    Possibly the last time we record with @CouRageJD https://t.co/Jm6yU2Gf3P

    7.5K155192296K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20263.1x their median

    I fell asleep in my chair playing Black Ops 2 zombies last night. YouTube in Ireland hits different.

    6.7K75220169K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20263.7x their median

    Irish people don’t belong in Los Angeles. https://t.co/oEKZGspQpo

    6.5K8071188K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.0x their median

    This just shows how shambolic your system has become @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeGaming, this clip was flagged for, and I quote “nudity and sexual content”. The time and effort of editors staying up late editing a video to then get a video removed because a flawed system is just so irritating. The video was re-uploaded with this part removed and then A NEW CLIP caused the video to be removed which seemed to be fine the first time around. Years this has gone on and nothing ever gets fixed. Please logically tell me why this clip should warrant the removal of the entire video? I look forward to your automated response.

    6.2K2879412201K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20263.3x their median

    USA world cup thoughts🤔 https://t.co/BX5uHrgug6

    5.1K1261.2K1362.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.0x their median

    I DID THE CUTSCENE THING!!! https://t.co/iLPm22RohX

    6.2K215274123K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 3.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 82% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is Terroriser's engagement rate on X?
Terroriser (@Terroriser) has an engagement rate of 0.169%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,297,011 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.169%, Terroriser sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Terroriser have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Terroriser post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going