Back to @TeoMercer's profile

︎ Teo Mercer engagement report

@TeoMercer - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
0.181%
125K views on a typical post
Reach
6.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
227
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 4,067 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 125K times each, and 0.181% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

︎ Teo Mercer's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,067 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, ︎ Teo Mercer sits above the 10th percentile of the 39,368 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.013%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.442%
p902.09%
p99152.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 39,368 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 95,038 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.442%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile152.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%55K
01:00 UTC-2%56K
02:00 UTC-4%54K
03:00 UTC-4%58K
04:00 UTC-6%47K
05:00 UTC-4%45K
06:00 UTC-5%52K
07:00 UTC-5%56K
08:00 UTC-4%66K
09:00 UTC-4%76K
10:00 UTC-3%78K
11:00 UTC-3%85K
12:00 UTC-2%94K
13:00 UTC-3%102K
14:00 UTC-3%105K
15:00 UTC-1%109K
16:00 UTC-3%106K
17:00 UTC-2%98K
18:00 UTC-1%92K
19:00 UTC-2%87K
20:00 UTC-1%81K
21:00 UTC-1%72K
22:00 UTC-2%62K
23:00 UTC-2%56K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%245K
Monday+1%313K
Tuesday-3%327K
Wednesday-3%275K
Thursday-2%256K
Friday-3%266K
Saturday+3%240K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 2026109x their median

    AI is great, but it does not protect you against inflation. Bitcoin does.

    20K2.2K2.3K5141.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202686x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump calls for the Senate to pass the crypto Clarity Act.

    17K1.8K5881931.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202646x their median

    The Clarity Act is ready for a full Senate floor vote. The bill represents a true bipartisan compromise with thousands of hours of work on both sides, and it couldn't come at a better time. The status quo in the U.S. isn't working. There's no federal framework, so bad actors like FTX can harm U.S. customers and much of the industry has gone offshore totally outside U.S. purview. This bill fixes that with strong consumer protections, real tools for law enforcement, and a path for America to lead in this industry. Crypto can't be uninvented at this point, so whether you love crypto or hate crypto, you should want clear federal laws. And it's also simply good politics: 70% of American voters say the U.S. should have already passed comprehensive crypto legislation. Let's finish this! Special thanks to the @standwithcrypto members who sent 950k contacts to their representatives in congress. Keep it up.

    8.5K1.3K514150570K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20263.2x their median

    🚨LOSSES FROM COLDCARD HACK EXCEED $100M High confidence 1,596 BTC has been stolen from ~7300 addresses across 3 confirmed waves + more 14 smaller incidents. If we add suspected (but unconfirmed), the total balloons to $130m (2k BTC). More in the thread below 👇 https://t.co/RAl3ib67qa

    5261174143168K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.8x their median

    https://t.co/BtQxlTUw94

    5704231089K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.0x their median

    US ISM Manufacturing PMI came in at 54.6 vs 55.2 expected. A small miss, but still comfortably in expansion territory. For BTC, I think this week is pretty simple. Hold the high $70 Ks and the setup still looks good. Reclaim $80 K and things get much more interesting. Jobs data later this week is probably where the real volatility comes from.

    3596126048K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.0x their median

    The TGE was only the beginning. New doors are opening. New audiences await. And the story of Alberich is only beginning to unfold. The next chapter is already taking shape. When the time is right, we'll reveal more. 🎼 The World's First Musical Meme Coin 🦄 Trade $ALBRH on Uniswap: https://t.co/DKvs33DJ1D 🌐 https://t.co/TncGsV6Rl2 THE LEGEND CONTINUES.

    382356379K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.9x their median

    I’ve always hated selling an asset just because I need liquidity. That’s why the model behind @lendaryasia makes sense to me. Eligible holders can use BTC, ETH and SOL as collateral to access cash or stablecoins without fully selling their position. And now they’re introducing LRY as the utility token around the ecosystem, with staking, borrower benefits and platform participation. LRY Early Access is already live too. US$5,000 total rewards: → US$3K USDC → US$2K worth of LRY Entry is pretty simple: reserve at least 10 USDC, follow @lendaryasia and post your transaction ID under their designated campaign post. They’ll also be running US$300 weekly campaigns. I’d keep this one on the radar. 🌐 https://t.co/6LUbn1TCZo #ad | T&Cs and eligibility apply

    33737640136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.9x their median

    US PCE came in at 3.7% vs 3.6% expected. Q2 GDP was right in line at 1.5%. A slightly hotter PCE isn’t exactly what BTC needed after this recent run, so some short term chop wouldn’t surprise me. But my view from here is still bullish. Even a deeper move into the low $70Ks wouldn’t change much for me. I’d still see it as consolidation before the next leg higher.

    37221310137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.7x their median

    Robinhood memecoins had a pretty wild week. Now I want to see who actually sticks around. Keeping people interested once the timeline moves on is the hard part. That’s usually when you find out which projects actually built a community.

    3391443042K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 4,067 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 125K times each, and 0.181% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

What is ︎ Teo Mercer's engagement rate on X?
︎ Teo Mercer (@TeoMercer) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,946,816 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, ︎ Teo Mercer sits above the 10th percentile of the 39,368 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TeoMercer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,067 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TeoMercer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going