Back to @TeoMercer's profile

︎ Teo Mercer engagement report

@TeoMercer - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
0.305%
116K views on a typical post
Reach
5.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
355
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 355 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 116K times each, and 0.305% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 70x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #crypto, #dolphin.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #crypto, #dolphin.

Compared with accounts its own size

︎ Teo Mercer's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, ︎ Teo Mercer sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 311 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 202670x their median

    AI is great, but it does not protect you against inflation. Bitcoin does.

    19K2.2K2.3K5141.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202655x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump calls for the Senate to pass the crypto Clarity Act.

    17K1.8K5881931.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202630x their median

    The Clarity Act is ready for a full Senate floor vote. The bill represents a true bipartisan compromise with thousands of hours of work on both sides, and it couldn't come at a better time. The status quo in the U.S. isn't working. There's no federal framework, so bad actors like FTX can harm U.S. customers and much of the industry has gone offshore totally outside U.S. purview. This bill fixes that with strong consumer protections, real tools for law enforcement, and a path for America to lead in this industry. Crypto can't be uninvented at this point, so whether you love crypto or hate crypto, you should want clear federal laws. And it's also simply good politics: 70% of American voters say the U.S. should have already passed comprehensive crypto legislation. Let's finish this! Special thanks to the @standwithcrypto members who sent 950k contacts to their representatives in congress. Keep it up.

    8.5K1.3K514150570K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202624x their median

    Crypto payments usually break at the accountant's desk, not at the blockchain. No invoice match, no bank confirmation, nothing to file. A7 International showed a flow at its launch that seems designed for that desk: • you upload the actual invoice, the system reads the details • the recipient company's registration certificate goes through verification • the counterparty receives a regular SWIFT transfer in the invoice currency • you get a document confirming the payment was executed • 0.3% fee, from one business day The payer uses USDT. The paper trail looks like a normal international transfer. Shor's framing: "We make complex financial operations understandable again." If the documents hold up in a real audit, this is the interesting part. Following: https://t.co/x9TUYXs87q #crypto #A7

    7.8K37239821.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202619x their median

    Kimchi just BEAT his $40M Trump trade in 1 HOUR after joining Pumpfun https://t.co/14j8BEhH3B

    5.4K314656343954K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20269.6x their median

    AEON launched Agentic Checkout V2 and now supports hotel booking through Travala, with an on-chain agent wallet to manage funds and track transactions. From products to travel, AI agents are moving closer to executing real-world economic tasks.🧳 https://t.co/IKNNRtY1E4

    1.2K1.9K2527121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267.3x their median

    Introducing AEON Agentic Checkout: it connects agents to Shopify’s 3M+ storefronts and 1B+ products, with AEON AI Card providing controlled spending power at checkout, with one-time agent card and predefined limits. As Agentic Checkout expands into more checkout scenarios, AEON is building the settlement layer for agents to transact, pay, and settle across the digital and physical economy.

    7431.6K13377185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.0x their median

    🚨LOSSES FROM COLDCARD HACK EXCEED $100M High confidence 1,596 BTC has been stolen from ~7300 addresses across 3 confirmed waves + more 14 smaller incidents. If we add suspected (but unconfirmed), the total balloons to $130m (2k BTC). More in the thread below 👇 https://t.co/RAl3ib67qa

    5251174143168K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20261.6x their median

    Bitcoin is playing out nicely so far. The bearish divergence played out, RSI has cooled down, and BTC has already reclaimed $82K, even reaching $83.2K earlier today. Now I want to see $82K hold as support, followed by consolidation toward $88K. $90K my next target.

    51417320112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    $CRYSTALSTONES is pioneering Real World Asset (RWA) ecosystem built on the BNB Smart Chain designed to bridge high-value physical commodities with blockchain technology, they got their own Cex under development ✖️ @crystalstones01 🤝 https://t.co/3enJFVN96Q ✅Live on CoinMarketcap and Coingecko ✅ Dexscreener: https://t.co/FmrUCIKHVy CA Bep20: 0xe252FCb1Aa2E0876E9B5f3eD1e15B9b4d11A0b00 $CRYSTALSTONES #RWA #BNBChain

    38140865121K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#crypto#dolphin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 355 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 116K times each, and 0.305% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 70x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #crypto, #dolphin.

What is ︎ Teo Mercer's engagement rate on X?
︎ Teo Mercer (@TeoMercer) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,939,716 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, ︎ Teo Mercer sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TeoMercer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TeoMercer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going