Back to @TechDev_52's profile

TechDev engagement report

@TechDev_52 - 552K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.401%
of 552K followers
Per impression
1.35%
165K views on a typical post
Reach
29.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.122%
201 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 552K followers, an engagement rate of 0.401%. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.7K interactions, about 2.1x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.401%, TechDev sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 67 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 20262.1x their median

    First business cycle bull flip in 6 years. Each started a parabolic crypto move. https://t.co/vWmTWktQ2G

    3.9K53515561481K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.9x their median

    Bitcoin has gone parabolic 4/4 times when the business cycle crosses above zero line. 2009 - 2012 - 2016 - 2026 5th cross has triggered. https://t.co/SBXPbwFWro

    3.6K4549546277K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    2020. But bigger. https://t.co/cWacV2sgsQ

    2.7K2686521149K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 2026

    Green phase of the cycle has begun. https://t.co/mEugJVzWim

    2.5K30217919261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    You are mid cycle. The longest cycle yet. The bull phase began last month. And crypto is now catching up. As it always has. https://t.co/YYoheQCmSg

    2.5K2836416155K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Many will be left behind. https://t.co/VKbfXWwzyU

    2.5K2485721127K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 2026

    Unpopular opinion: The first macro cycle since 2020 may finally be starting. https://t.co/Bv0k1D0Upe

    2.2K30812828203K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    How do you know you're mid-cycle? Same way you knew in 2020. Last cycle top was the last time Bitcoin hit its upper log regression band right as the business cycle peaked. Not a coincidence.(2017=2021) Then, as the business cycle reversed and descended toward its zero line, Bitcoin fell to its lower band. (2018=2022) As the business cycle entered its green bottoming phase, Bitcoin lifted off to its mid-cycle peak, halfway between both bands. (2019=2025). The business cycle continued its green trough and Bitcoin reversed from its mid-cycle peak back to its lower band. (2020=2026). All this time, altcoins have consolidated in an ascending triangle, yet to break above last cycle's peak. Now here we are. The parabolic phase trigger. The business cycle has broken above its zero line, ready to send Bitcoin back to its upper band, and altcoins out of their consolidation. As I've discussed for nearly two years, "the cycle" is not some mystic 4-year-based religion. Its landmarks are not magically decided by a calendar. Calling a mid-band 2025 peak a cycle top and not 2019, simply because it took longer, ignores every piece of underlying data that has ever defined a cycle. The business cycle drives the global risk heartbeat, the world in which Bitcoin and crypto live. So far this one (2022-2026) has shown one major difference to the last (2018-2021) and every one before it...it's longer. Welcome to the parabolic phase. One that will greatly confuse those that ignore its roots, and reward those that don't.

    2.2K2897741171K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 2026

    Last cycle top was in 2021. And the fun part of this one *finally* looks about ready to get started. https://t.co/ShluoA1yd1

    2.0K23816330168K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 2026

    Your definition of "the cycle" may need to change. https://t.co/bqyoQl5BAK

    2.0K21012919173K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 552K followers, an engagement rate of 0.401%. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.7K interactions, about 2.1x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is TechDev's engagement rate on X?
TechDev (@TechDev_52) has an engagement rate of 0.401%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 552,457 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.401%, TechDev sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TechDev_52 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @TechDev_52 post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going